Re: [Sugar-devel] Google Code In 2016

Hi, Walter Currently for GSOC and GCI, we tell applicants to create a development environment. I think that is a mistake. One of the great strengths of Sugar is that it is it's own development environment. For example, the design of Sugar is that Browse as an activity can be installed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [IAEP] Google Code In 2016

Wonderful!!! On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Samson Goddy wrote: > It will be sooner. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Utkarsh Tiwari < > iamutkarshtiw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Congratulations! I would like to volunteer for SugarLabs as mentor >> in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Sam, I and my fellow mates have been facing the same build issues while setting up a fresh copy of sugar-build. I think we need to look into recent changes(made to Browse) which are failing the Browse-activity while installation. Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Lam, Removing that line means that Browse activity (the browser in sugar) doesn't get installed. Did you experience the error on a fresh install of sugar-build? What OS are you running? If you have sugar installed on that os through the package manager, what version is it? Thanks,