On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Thanks for the quick feedback!
>
> James Cameron writes:
>
> > I've just checked a mail server; we still have an alias b...@laptop.org
> > pointing at b...@altern.org. Let me know if you don't need it.
>
> Oh, nice. Thanks for proposi
Thanks for the quick feedback!
James Cameron writes:
> I've just checked a mail server; we still have an alias b...@laptop.org
> pointing at b...@altern.org. Let me know if you don't need it.
Oh, nice. Thanks for proposing. b...@altern.org is dead indeed.
Can you point b...@laptop.org to b..
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:08:43AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Hi James and all,
>
> let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue
> which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar?
>
> Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because my
Hi James and all,
let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue
which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar?
Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because my
@laptop.org alias somehow died), I've missed a lot. I'm aware of GS
The situation of unreleased yet ported activities is not a consequence
of process, but of missing-in-action activity maintainers, and porting
by GCI and GSoC.
Your choice not to contribute your time for this is noted.
It is a tempting move; I could simplify my work by focusing on
maintaining acti
Naturally it is easy to comment on what you haven't read.
When you propose a change to practice - it certainly isn't going to
match. Current practice finds us with almost 80 activities which have
been ported to GTK3 and which are not available to users via ASLO.
I am an activity maintainer - s
TL;DR. Too long, didn't read.
What I did read doesn't match with the situation and practice; and
you're not an activity maintainer, so I don't think you know what you
are talking about.
Development process is optimised for activity maintainers, not
integrators and certainly not users.
If any ac
You repeated that I destroyed something. Ignoring commits does not mean
there was destruction. I apologize again for my ignorance of the fact
that people were developing and maintaining activities in cyberspace.
Git history or no, the important point is to have working activities
available to
There were two repositories. You destroyed, by ignoring, commits to
those repositories. You've done it several times now; but I'm not
surprised, as you aren't an activity maintainer yet.
GTK+ is the name to the toolkit according to both The GTK+ Project and
Wikipedia. It deserves a "+" because
I really wish you would be a bit more careful with the facts. There was
no repository for this activity, so it is impossible that i destroyed
anything.
Why would you merge translations from one activity to another when
neither has been ported to GTK3?
Porting to GTK3 (no evidence that it des
Developers are invited to attend the next team meeting, on;
- Tuesday 22nd May at 7am US/Eastern,
- Tuesday 22nd May at 11am UTC,
- Tuesday 22nd May at 4:30pm IST,
- Tuesday 22nd May at 9pm Australia/Sydney,
Agenda to include
- what we have been working on,
#sugar-meeting irc.freenode.net
--
11 matches
Mail list logo