Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 06:18:14PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 6:12 PM: > > It sounds like you share some of the same intentions as Martin Guy, > > who needed i386 support. He found what he needed with Trisquel. Have > > you tried that? > No, I'm interested in runn

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread Alex Perez
James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 6:12 PM: It sounds like you share some of the same intentions as Martin Guy, who needed i386 support. He found what he needed with Trisquel. Have you tried that? No, I'm interested in running on x86_64, EFI-compliant hardware.  I have no need or desire for Tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 04:56:06PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > Answers inline Thanks. Me too. > James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 2:16 PM: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > > > James, > > > > > > I booted up the latest Sugar-live-build image, which I'd > > > downlo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread Walter Bender
Maybe we can distribute a free and a nonfree version? More work but not so much On Sun, Jan 17, 2021, 7:56 PM Alex Perez wrote: > Answers inline > > James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 2:16 PM: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > >> James, > >> > >> I booted up the l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread Alex Perez
Answers inline James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 2:16 PM: On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: James, I booted up the latest Sugar-live-build image, which I'd downloaded from http://people.sugarlabs.org/~quozl/sugar-live-build/ and written to a USB stick, and booted it up

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > James, > > I booted up the latest Sugar-live-build image, which I'd downloaded from > http://people.sugarlabs.org/~quozl/sugar-live-build/ and written to a USB > stick, and booted it up in an HP-branded terminal from ~2012, which works

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar-starchart, flipsticks, labyrinth in Fedora Rawhide fails to install due to no python3 activity port

2021-01-17 Thread James Cameron
Thanks for testing. For StarChart, the latest release is for Python 2. Work on a port to Python 3 was begun but not completed. https://github.com/sugarlabs/starchart/pull/8 For Flip Sticks, the latest release is for Python 3, but Fedora project is not yet packaging that release. I suggest upgr

[Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

2021-01-17 Thread Alex Perez
James, I booted up the latest Sugar-live-build image, which I'd downloaded from http://people.sugarlabs.org/~quozl/sugar-live-build/ and written to a USB stick, and booted it up in an HP-branded terminal from ~2012, which works perfectly fine with the latest Fedora SoaS images. During early