Re: [Sugar-devel] Hi; GSoC?

2010-03-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:21:08AM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: > Hi, I'm a student interested in the Sugar GSoC -- I've been reading this > list for a while so I thought I'd ask about how I might be useful. For > the summer, I'm near Boston (is anybody else? I'd love to chat with > enthusiasts in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal-like activities (was: Re: [ASLO] Release Read ETexts-19)

2010-03-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07:04AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi James, > > I am very glad people are exploring alternatives around the Journal. > Not sure what your goals are -- would be interesting to hear. > > Comments > > - I don't know how "pluggable" the Journal is, but I'd encourage

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hi; GSoC?

2010-03-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:43:22AM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Isaac Dupree wrote: > > I wonder if this Zero/Sugar > > project could use some GSOC support, or if there are more > > useful/important things to work on? > > I think 0install+Sugar integration would be a very valuable projec

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hi; GSoC?

2010-03-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:50:35AM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: > On 03/18/10 12:27, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > ... > > [1] > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Documentation_Team/Services/Activity_Developers_Guide > > [2] > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Delay zooming to home view desktop

2010-03-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:29:02PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: > Alternating between desktop zoom levels, for example between the home > view and the friends view, shows a home view drawing delay of about one > second on XO-1 (0.82) and XO-1.5 (0.84). Just checcked in XO-1 (0.82), and on my box in

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-datastore-0.88.0

2010-03-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-datastore/sugar-datastore-0.88.0.tar.bz2 == News == * fix migration from 0.82 data store (#1838) * New sucrose-0.88 branch ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs

Re: [Sugar-devel] An error occurred during upload to activities.sugarlabs.org

2010-04-01 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:26:29PM +0200, Behavior Vehikel wrote: > Hi, > > I am try to upload release 5 of Kandid to > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/developers/versions/add/4254 > Got errors like that: > > Oops! There seems to be a problem with this file... > > An error occurred moving

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Record-65 works fine on soas-i386-20100402.17.USB (TESTING results)

2010-04-03 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:18:07PM -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: > Record-65 works fine on soas-i386-20100402.17.USB (record not installed > on this spin as downloaded) > 2GB USB made with liveusb-creator EeePC900 > *record-65.xo transferred to 2nd USB stick and drag-drop into journal of > r

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fw: #1941 UNSP: ViewSlides-11 does not start

2010-04-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:14:22AM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > Aleksey, > > I've been trying to recreate this. It works OK in the Sugar > environment on F10 and F11 and it worked fine in the sugar-jhbuild I > was using on F11. I assumed that my sugar-jhbuild was out of date so > I did an updat

Re: [Sugar-devel] Record v67

2010-04-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:42:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Aleksey, > > I noticed Record v67's released. The changelog says: > > +* Fix 0sugar "Cannot find cached 0sugar-launch implementation." isuue > > but I can't see any commit that could do that between v66 and v67; all > I see are i1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Code Review process changes

2010-04-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:37:54AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:17 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > Activities too? I've been tracking #1571 for months now, and if posting > > the patch here will work, I'm all for it. ;-) > > If you were just asking whether it's ok to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Experimental work... updated.

2010-04-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > This is just a quick note to let interested parties know that I've updated my > experimental repo at > >http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/mstone/sugar >git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar > > to sugar*-0.88. > > For those

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO QA process

2010-04-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:46:06AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +0000, Aleksey Lim escribió: > > In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular > > GNU/Linux distribution. ASLO is not one centralized product, as already &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO QA process

2010-04-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:35:03AM -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: > > > Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > El Sat, 24-04-2010 a las 07:19 +0000, Aleksey Lim escribió: > > > >> In my mind activities on ASLO are not something like packages in regular > >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO QA process

2010-04-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:54:12AM -0300, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 29 April 2010 09:46, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > I liked your proposal of creating per-deployment collections to manage a > > set of activities that has been tested and approved. I think this is one > > of the things Uruguay wanted

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Record-76 experimental release

2010-04-30 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, This is not public release since new version requires gst stack which doesn't conform any Sugar Platform versions. Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4081 Sugar Platform: 0.84 - 0.88 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addons/versions/4081#version-76 Rel

[Sugar-devel] life w/o NM

2008-12-04 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Maybe stupid question but, as far as I can understand, NM is required to monitor/set net devices/self IPs. Is it necessary to use it in case of common desktop e.g. w/o wireless and with stable ethernet connection ? /Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mail

[Sugar-devel] Missed icons in sugar-artwork

2008-12-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, I'm packaging sugar and found out that Calculate(sugar-artwork) hasn't edit-cut.svg. There are two 3-months bugs on dev.laptop.org #7939 and #8296 - I see thats no a problem for XO :) Could I borrow edit-cut.svg from Gnome project ? /Aleksey ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missed icons in sugar-artwork

2008-12-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:40:53AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote: > There's no edit-cut because Sugar uses the notion of "copy and erase" > instead. In what context is the icon needed? Perhaps we should > switch to using the copy-and-erase secondary menu item under the copy > button. from Calculate-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missed icons in sugar-artwork

2008-12-05 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:54:58AM -0500, Eben Eliason wrote: > OK, I see. We could file a bug against Calculate asking it to use Hmm, there is #8195 bug for that reason (I used 'edit-cut' for track searching) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lis

[Sugar-devel] Removing "Register" button from sugar on non-XO machine

2008-12-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, I'm going to add patch to remove "Register" button from sugar packages for altlinux. Is there any reason to have it on non-XO machine ? /Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/su

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Request for help packaging activities for Sugar on a Stick

2008-12-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > > I don't suggest waiting for activities to be packaged, and no porting > > should be required: can't you just preinstall a bunch of .xo files? > > Hello, > > we are not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Request for help packaging activities for Sugar on a Stick

2008-12-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 04:53:15AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > > > I don't suggest waiting for activities to be packaged, and no porting > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] ActivityTeam proposal

2009-01-10 Thread Aleksey Lim
Where is a place I could enter myself into :) On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:46:56PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > Hi all, hope you are enjoying FUDcon. > > Given the recent events at OLPC, I'm planning to refocus my activity > development efforts on SugarLabs. I imagine other activity developers >

Re: [Sugar-devel] ActivityTeam proposal

2009-01-10 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:46:56PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > One result should be fewer activities > "dropping off the radar" into lack of maintenance. I suggest using explicit status of activity's maintenance at least active and orphaned - to encourage people to pick up unsupported activities

Re: [Sugar-devel] ActivityTeam proposal

2009-01-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:42:19PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > Yep, once activities.sugarlabs.org is up and running (help wanted > btw!) we should be able to keep this up to date. I hope to 'feature' > orphaned activities from time to time to try to help get them picked > up as well. > > Sugges

[Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Some thought after reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sugar_on_Fedora:_RPMs_or_.xos%3F Maybe instead of choosing one format for activities just add to activity.info dependency in common/distro-unbinded notation: - Activity's author package code in .xo format with dependency string l

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: > On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Some thought after reading > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sugar_on_Fedora:_RPMs_or_.xos%3F > > > > Maybe instead of choosin

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:44:52AM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: > On 1/12/09, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:43:01PM -0500, l...@faraone.cc wrote: > >> On 1/11/09, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Some thoug

Re: [Sugar-devel] .rpms vs .xos for Activity packaging

2009-01-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Maybe its only my peculiar desire (to talk about packaging issues:), but... Since I'm trying support sugar in Gentoo/ALILinux/Mandriva, I don't know how to treat honey activities: - package them all and do not rely on w.l.o/addons.s.o - let user download them from w.l.o/addons.s.o -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Memorize moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hey, > > i just moved memorize to the Sugar Labs repositories. Sayamindu, can you > please point pootle to the new remote? > > Btw: I am still looking for developers and maintainers help for this > cute little activity, one of

[Sugar-devel] CartoonBuilder moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, CartoonBuilder moved to git.sugarlabs.org -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Flipsticks moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Flipsticks moved to git.sugarlabs.org -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > >> On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer >> dependencies that are only in Intrepid. > Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-22 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:39:34PM +1100, Joel Stanley wrote: > Hello Simon, > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:28, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > > Thanks everyone for your great contributions! > > > > You can find more details and screenshots at > > [1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release

Re: [Sugar-devel] ActivityTeam inaugural meeting

2009-01-28 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 08:05:30AM +0545, Bryan Berry wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 18:17 -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Please join us for the first Sugar Labs ActivityTeam IRC meeting this > > Friday, 3PM EST in #sugar-meeting on FreeNode. > > > > > > http://sugarl

[Sugar-devel] sugar-widgets request

2009-02-01 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, While tweaking/hacking some activities I have to, from time to time, copy&paste code between activities. Sometime it works well: tempo slider from TamTam activities means 20-30 lines and 5-7 images. Now (for Speak activity) I need ChatBox widget from Chat and it costs 400 lines. Its a go

Re: [Sugar-devel] [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: sugar-widgets request

2009-02-02 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:13:58PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 13:11, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:08:11AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 02:32, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >&g

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-widgets request

2009-02-02 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:08:11AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 02:32, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > While tweaking/hacking some activities I have to, from time to time, > > copy&paste code > > between activities. Sometime it

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] gst-plugins-espeak

2009-02-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/gst-plugins-espeak http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/gst-plugins-espeak Guess it could be useful for activities that use speech synthesizer. It is very simple implementation(it process the whole text at once), thats why I'm not going to push it to o

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] CartoonBuilder-2

2009-02-09 Thread Aleksey Lim
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/CartoonBuilder/CartoonBuilder-2.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/CartoonBuilder/CartoonBuilder-2.xo == NEWS == * Support various screen resolutions * Use jobjects for characters, backgrounds and sounds * F

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] FlipSticks-2

2009-02-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/FlipSticks/FlipSticks-2.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/FlipSticks/FlipSticks-2.xo == NEWS = * OLPC#4740 Implement collaboration * OLPC#6892 GPL requirements * OLPC#9183 COPYING file is missed * OLPC#9166

Re: [Sugar-devel] Which Csound package to go on sugar?

2009-02-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:31:36PM +, victor wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have just been playing with the latest sugar on a stick and I have a > suggestion/recommendation. The package 'csound' currently being > included with sugar should be substituted with the package 'olpcsound'. > > I ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work

2009-02-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:04:02PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > as the site is becoming more functional, we are in need of feedback > before we direct there the masses. its exactly time to ask my favorite question :) What will happen if someone download TamTam/StoryBuilder/etc, and unfort

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-02-19 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:48:56AM +, Gary C Martin wrote: > P.S As a member of the ActivityTeam, I am rather embarrassed to have > to ask what I should now do with the Moon-9.tar.bz2 file that fell out > the back of ./setup dist_source (couldn't see any ActivityTeam wiki > suggestions fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS - Another Snapshot

2009-02-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:17:06PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi everybody, > > after some time, we've another snapshot of soas-1 ready for testing! You > can now grab it directly from [1]. > > So what has changed in comparison to the last one? > > * size improvements everywhere - the w

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS - Another Snapshot

2009-02-21 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 02:09:07PM -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote: > > > > > On all: the cursor was invisible to start. It appeared after I navigated > > > to the Journal and opened the detail view of an entry. Speak didn't work. > > > > Ok! So this is still occuring; I don't know, what might be causi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS - Another Snapshot

2009-02-21 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 02:43:09PM -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > > > Caroline Meeks wrote: > > > >> > >> > On all: the cursor was invisible to start. It appeared after I > >>navigated > >> > to the Journal and opened the det

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS - moving onward...

2009-02-22 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 09:23:25PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > Hi all, > > and here's another announcement for Sugar on a Stick! > > You can grab your updated version now directly from here: > > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/1/latest.iso > > This file is linking to the lat

Re: [Sugar-devel] Location of Saved XO Settings

2009-02-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:51:29PM -0800, FGrose wrote: > > The XO settings from the control panel used to rest in > /home/olpc/.sugar/default/config. > > Where are they resting now in SoaS images? SoaS is based on 0.83.x thus all configs are now in gconf it could be changed by sugar-control-pane

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS - moving onward...

2009-02-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Do you want that to stay that way (i.e. all distros need to include > > /etc/redhat-release) or do you agree that in the future this should be > > changed to something not dis

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mozilla Add-ons: FlipSticks Nomination

2009-03-03 Thread Aleksey Lim
on, FlipSticks, has been reviewed by a > > Sugar Labs Addons editor who approved your add-on to be public. > > > > Your most recent version (2) has also been made public. > > > > You can view your public add-on now at: > > http://addons.sugarlabs.org/addon/4044 > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mozilla Add-ons: FlipSticks Nomination

2009-03-03 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:11:40PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > > I actually like the idea that the community gets some notice when something > > new is posted to a.sl.o > > > Which eventually might get annoying as volumes go up. > > If/

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] gst-plugins-espeak-0.2

2009-03-09 Thread Aleksey Lim
eSpeak library as a sound source for GStreamer http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/gst-plugins-espeak == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/gst-plugins-espeak/gst-plugins-espeak-0.2.tar.bz2 == SoaS == http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/repositories/1/ == NEWS = * Add ma

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] CartoonBuilder-3

2009-03-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4037 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/CartoonBuilder/CartoonBuilder-3.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25947/cartoonbuilder-3.xo == NEWS == * Run activity in CM12 environme

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4042 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/InfoSlicer/InfoSlicer-4.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25952/infoslicer-4.xo == NEWS == * Run activity in CM12 environment -- Alek

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-15 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4042 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/InfoSlicer/InfoSlicer-5.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25952/infoslicer-5.xo == NEWS == * Run activity in Sucrose 0.82 environment

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-15 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:43:22AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Aleksey Lim writes: > > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4042 > > I just updated http://sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/InfoSlicer so that it > points to the latest release. thanks > I also noti

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-15 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:52:14AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > I subscribed yesterday to the Sugarlabs gitorious. I don't plan to > actively develop an activity, but I can help with the translation of > some. > > Asking each maintainer for commit access is too much overhead for a > s

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
The Sugar Platform is a set of versioned components on which activity authors can rely when targeting their activities to run on a particular Sugar version [1]. On Mandriva it lives in task-sugar meta-package [2] and includes: - sugar-fructose >= 0.84.0 - sugar-glucose >= 0.84.0 - gstreamer0.10-pl

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84.0 on Mandriva

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > One minor issue I see with this packaging is that etoys is technically > part of glucose, but you packaged it as part of fructose (as "etoys- > activity"). If someone was to only install glucose then another etoys- > based acti

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] InfoSlicer-4

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:36:09AM +, Laura Cowen wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:45:51 +, Aleksey Lim > wrote: > > I've just installed V5 and the changes you've made look great. Definitely > more integrated into Sugar now. :) > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > Hi Edward, > > Edward Cherlin writes: > > >> (As I said, I know what Pootle is good for, but I still don't like it. > >> Would be nice to ease things for people who don't want to use it, and > >> for activities that are not in it.) > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Access to multiple repos in SugarLabs gitorious

2009-03-16 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:15:18PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:32:44AM +0100, Bastien wrote: > > Hi Edward, > > > > Edward Cherlin writes: > > > > >> (As I said, I know what Pootle is good for, but I still don't like it. &g

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84 .0 on Caixa Mágica the Magellan project

2009-03-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
The Sugar Platform is a set of versioned components on which activity authors can rely when targeting their activities to run on a particular Sugar version [1]. On Mag it lives in task-sugar meta-package [2] and includes: - sugar-fructose >= 0.84.0 - sugar-glucose >= 0.84.0 - gstreamer0.10-plugins

[Sugar-devel] What should be included into SugarPlatform-0.84

2009-03-17 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/SugarPlatform/0.84 The Sugar Platform is a set of versioned components on which activity authors can rely when targeting their activities to run on a particular Sugar version. Has someone any preferences about particular versions or missed dep

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84 .0 on Caixa Mágica the Magellan project

2009-03-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:28AM +, Paulo Trezentos wrote: > Hi Aleksey and all, > > We have tested with success the new version of the packages. > In this moment, we are focused in get Sugar to work as a collaborative > tool for the classroom. > I believe this would turn Sugar in a "killer

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84 .0 on Caixa Mágica the Magellan project

2009-03-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:38:46AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:28AM +, Paulo Trezentos wrote: > > Hi Aleksey and all, > > > > We have tested with success the new version of the packages. > > In this moment, we are focused in get Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] SugarPlatform-0.84 .0 on Caixa Mágica the Magellan project

2009-03-18 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:53:48PM +, Pedro Pessoa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:38:46AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:28AM +, Paulo Trezentos wrote: > > > Hi Aleksey and all, > > > > > > We have tested with suc

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to build from source?

2009-03-19 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Ivan Pulido wrote: > Hey, Im trying to build Sugar enviroment from source for ArchLinux. So i > cant use jhbuild as it is to do this. Im wondering if you have information, > tips or suggestions on how to do this (good links maybe?). Since all I got > is pra

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity platform discussion

2009-03-19 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:00:38PM -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On activities.sugarlabs.org we are able to say what platforms a > particular activity supports. > > Note that this is in *addition* to describing the Sugar application > version (0.82, 0.84, etc). So the platform support has more to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity platform discussion

2009-03-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:52:14AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:00:38PM -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > But there are > > differences like Python 2.5 (SoaS1) vs 2.6 (SoaS2) that are > > independent of the SP. > I guess these differences won

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help

2009-03-26 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 07:39:47AM +0100, asran zara wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm new in the community, I'm Asram Zarat > I have read http://socghop.appspot.com/org/show/google/gsoc2009/sugarlabs > and I'm trying to do my first modification to my development environment > I'm using fedora 10, but I g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Modules/Activities up for adoption

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > Honey: > * Poll Builder > * Story Builder > * hellomesh > > Hopefully this will result in some great new features for the 0.86 release! > > I'm happy to do code reviews and offer advice to anyone taking these > on, but on the other

[Sugar-devel] Migrate StoryBuilder to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, StoryBuilder's repo was moved to git.sugarlabs.org http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/story-builder-branch -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] StoryBuilder-14

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4073 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25998/xpi/story_builder-14.xo == NEWS == * Shrink screen resolution to 1024x700 from 1200x750 * Store stories in journal instead of files * Run activity with pygame-1.8

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Migrate HelloMesh to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, HelloMesh's repo was moved to git.sugarlabs.org http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/hello-mesh -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Migrate JokeMachine to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, JokeMachine's repo was moved to git.sugarlabs.org http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/joke-machine-branch -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Migrate JigsawPuzzle to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, JigsawPuzzle's repo was moved to git.sugarlabs.org http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/jigsaw-puzzle-branch -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Migrate SliderPuzzle to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-27 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, SliderPuzzle's repo was moved to git.sugarlabs.org http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/slider-puzzle-branch -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] activities-devel.sugarlabs.org is ready to test

2009-03-28 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Key features to test after merging/adapting upstream code: * there are only sugar addons type; all Mozilla addon types were removed * new addon type Content(.xol bundles) - addon's version will be incremented on each uploading this versioning scheme should be changed after rethink

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] activities-devel.sugarlabs.org is ready to test

2009-03-28 Thread Aleksey Lim
admin login : ad...@sugarlabs.org admin password : test -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] activities-devel.sugarlabs.org is ready to test

2009-03-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:17:03AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > Key features to test after merging/adapting upstream code: > > * there are only sugar addons type; > all Mozilla addon types were removed > * new addon type Content(.xol bundles) > -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code proposal: Speech Synthesis

2009-03-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:41:35AM +0530, chirag jain wrote: > Hi!! > > I have created a rough proposal of speech synthesis. Please have a look at: > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/speech-synthesis > > Well the basic idea is to provide a button in core sugar like a home > button which is always

Re: [Sugar-devel] Google summer of Code proposal: Speech Synthesis

2009-03-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
to pronounce it, you could use this method.. or just sugarize StarDict :) > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:41:35AM +0530, chirag jain wrote: > > > Hi!! > > > > > > I have created a rough proposal o

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Chat-65 in sucrose-0.84 branch

2009-04-01 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4069 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Chat/Chat-65.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/latest/4069 == NEWS == * Support new activity.info exec parameter * #402: "share o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Where to put info on activities under development?

2009-04-02 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 11:33:17AM +0200, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering where to put the wiki-pages for activities that are > still > under development. the common practice tends to separate the whole activities related pages between activities.sugarlabs.org(userland pa

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] activities.sugarlabs.org v2

2009-04-03 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, Key features after merging/adapting upstream code: * new addon type Content(.xol bundles) addon's version will be incremented on each uploading * use bundle_id for activity GUID it should prevent creating two addons for the same activity * Application field should be filled for addo

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Read-66 in sucrose-0.84 branch

2009-04-06 Thread Aleksey Lim
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4028 == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Read/Read-66.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/latest/4028 == NEWS == * #703 Support evince binding w/o document_links support *

[Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-07 Thread Aleksey Lim
If I understand Wade correctly the one of the main purposes(at least) is not hiding "content" bundles somewhere(for example in Browse's bookmarks) ..and I see your concern(for what reason we should create new entities if there are lots of existed content - Gutenberg's texts, pdfs, etc) ..I was thi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:54:45PM -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Eben Eliason wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> Proposal. > >> > >> To achieve this target, instead of inventing new versioning

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:01:58PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Eben Eliason wrote: > > certainly provide a future path for activity versioning, promote the > > creation and modification of activities to be a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:12:17AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > Benefits. > > > > With this scheme accepted user will have unified interface to all > > objects(and theirs versions) - content(generated by activities

Re: [Sugar-devel] accessibility

2009-04-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
I've added this topic to 0.86 proposal goals http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.86#Proposal_Goals -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Labyrinth-5

2009-04-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 09:44:33AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 11 Apr 2009, at 06:48, Michael Stone wrote: > > >> P.S. One notable bug for XO 8.2 distro users, is that adding images > >> from the Journal is currently broken (bumping into rainbow), adding > >> images works fin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sound in SoaS

2009-04-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 11.04.2009, at 11:38, Caroline Meeks wrote: > >> The SoaS-Beta that came out on Thursday afternoon had some sound >> fixes. > > > AFAIK it only added the missing gst-speech plugin for Speak, no? Any > other changes? Too bad

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Labyrinth-5

2009-04-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:33:06AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 09:44:33AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > On 11 Apr 2009, at 06:48, Michael Stone wrote: > > > > >> P.S. One notable bug for XO 8.2 distro users

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unified Objects (was Unified bundles)

2009-04-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:30:00AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > Now here's a mess of ideas from which these three basic intuitions originate: > > 1. It would be nice to be able to generate various views of "what the user can > do" with shell globs rather than by writing complicated queries ove

Re: [Sugar-devel] Where does Browse store downloads?

2009-04-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Bastien wrote: > The subject says it all: where does Browse store downloads? > > I have downloaded a .tar.gz file. I can't seem to find it. > I've looked through .mozilla/* and .sugar/data/* but didn't > find anything useful. > > Hint? Browse stores d

Re: [Sugar-devel] Running Sugar with sugar-jhbuild - questions

2009-04-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 06:38:56PM +0200, Bastien wrote: > Luke Faraone writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Bastien > > wrote: > > > > How do I add new activities when using sugar-jhbuild ? > > > > Add them using the sugar-install-bundle command or using the journal. > > Thanks,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >