Re: [Sugar-devel] Eager to work in fixing the UI of sugarizer.

decisions stem from that basic premise. Have you considered this? Regards, Alex Perez MR. OPTIMIST wrote on 3/10/23 10:24 AM: > Hello everyone ! >                  I am Anuj Verma from Maharashtra, India majoring in > computer science and engineering.  I have worked in multiple project

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 36 SoaS ISO spin beta ready for testing

Hi folks, The Fedora 36 beta was released earlier this week, and the SoaS spin is ready for testing. This 860 megabyte ISO can be downloaded from: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/36_Beta/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-36_Beta-1.4.iso Any testing report

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso which I have confirmed is working as expected. The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote on 2/9/2022 12:37 PM: Hi Everyone, A fix for the fail to start iss

Re: [Sugar-devel] Donations to SugarLabs

Devin, We can now accept donations via both Zelle (US only) and PayPal, by sending to donati...@sugarlabs.org On 12/31/2021 6:25:40 AM, devin@ulibarri.website wrote: Hi, I have been receiving many year-end fundraising emails from other orgs, and this made me think of SugarLabs which is now an

[Sugar-devel] Sugar on a Stick (Fedora 35 spin) released

Today, Fedora 35 has been released, and is available for download from  https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/35/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso The above ISO is 946 megabytes, and can be written to a USB stick using Fedora Media Writer. It's also avai

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] Belated meeting reminder

Apologies for missing the meeting. It was my birthday, and my wife and I were out on the coast for the day. On 6/9/2021 5:19:51 AM, Walter Bender wrote: We have a Sugar Labs oversight meeting today at 19:30 UTC (3:30 on the US East Coast). We'll meet in the Matrix #sugar room. (Note that there is

[Sugar-devel] Announcement: Sugar on a Stick (SoaS) 34 released today

dora packages, which, as a whole, make up Sugar on a Stick. Regards, Alex Perez Sugar Labs Contributor & Fedora Package Wrangler ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Call for testing of Fedora 34 beta Sugar On A Stick

Folks, This is a call for testing of the upcoming Fedora 34 based Sugar on a Stick, which is now ready for testing on the following platforms: For 64-bit PCs, the ISO can be downloaded from: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/34_Beta-1.3/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-34_Beta-

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2021 aspirant

#x27;d be greatly appreciative. Regards, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] The future of Starchart and other "abandoned" GTK2/python2 activities

volunteer to fix them, or just voice your opinion on which have value. Thanks, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora has been branched, SoaS LiveUSB environment is up for testing

James, James Cameron wrote on 2/10/21 1:45 PM: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:48:30PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: >> Folks, >> >> The Fedora 34 branch has happened, and there's a nightly build of SoaS, >> based on Fedora 0.118, which I'd like to call on folks

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Telepathy] ANNOUNCE: telepathy-glib 0.24.2

FYI. Forwarded Message Subject:[Telepathy] ANNOUNCE: telepathy-glib 0.24.2 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 01:54:04 +0300 From: Alexander Akulich To: telepathy The "Ages Later" release. tarball: https://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-glib/telepathy-gl

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 6:12 PM: It sounds like you share some of the same intentions as Martin Guy, who needed i386 support. He found what he needed with Trisquel. Have you tried that? No, I'm interested in running on x86_64, EFI-compliant hardware.  I have no need or desire for Tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

Answers inline James Cameron wrote on 1/17/2021 2:16 PM: On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:03:10PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: James, I booted up the latest Sugar-live-build image, which I'd downloaded from http://people.sugarlabs.org/~quozl/sugar-live-build/ and written to a USB stick, and boot

[Sugar-devel] Compatibility report on latest Debian-based sugar live build - Xorg fails to load due to missing firmware

which will include firmware for things like Marvell wireless cards, Intel wireless cards, Atheros wireless cards (both USB and integrated/PCI/PCIe) Thanks, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as expected/desired, with session auto-login. All activities start _except_ FotoToon. Downloaded from  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20210113.n.0/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86

Re: [Sugar-devel] Today's Minutes and Next Meeting Time

James Cameron wrote on 12/9/20 9:09 PM: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:13:49AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: >> G'day! >> >> I have a topic, which perhaps needs discussion, > It is about time this came up again. Pretty much :) > >> We have been using IRC for many years. Recently, some of our >> commun

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

r shell.log you have to log out and log in again. > > For datastore.log you have to log out for a couple of minutes and then > log in again.  Otherwise the same datastore process may be reused. > > James Cameron > [7]http://quozl.netrek.org/ >

[Sugar-devel] Status of Python 3 port of Sugar Training Activity?

James, I saw your commit from seven days ago to https://github.com/sugarlabs/training-activity, and was wondering if it's considered "py3 complete". Can you provide a high level update on the state of the activity, as time allows? Tha

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick is available now!

Fedora 32 has been released, and the Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick spin is available for download from https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-x86_64-ISO. It is 950 megabytes in size. The 32-bit Fedora SoaS ARM image, suitable for use on Raspberry Pi 1/2/3, is also available at https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-armhfp-r

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Final is GO, SoaS Release Candidate ISO available immediately

mon problem? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel Alex Perez <mailto:ape...@alexperez.com> April 23, 2020 at 11:21 AM The Fedora release team met today and approved the release of Fedora 32, which is scheduled for this comi

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 32 Final is GO, SoaS Release Candidate ISO available immediately

The Fedora release team met today and approved the release of Fedora 32, which is scheduled for this coming Tuesday, April 28th. The 1.6 Release Candidate ISO for the Fedora 32 SoaS (Sugar on a Stick) LiveCD/ISO is downloadable from https://bit.ly/Fedora-32-RC-SoaS-LiveISO-x86_64 It is one gi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer knowledge activity pack

The sugar-devel list archives are available at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/ That said, I'm not sure what you're looking for exists there. Hemansh Khaneja March 19, 2020 at 9:05 AM I have joined this mailing list just now, could someone share an

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick beta ISO ready for testing

Fedora 32 has entered beta state, and the Sugar on a Stick beta ISO (size is 1 gigabyte) can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/SoaS-F32-Beta-ISO One known issue is that the IRC activity fails to start, and can not be used, as it's not yet been ported to Python 3. The current target final relea

Re: [Sugar-devel] Greetings from Sugar Labs DC!

packaging of the Sugar packages in Debian. Is that something you might be interested in helping us with? Regards, Alex Perez Christian Faris <mailto:christian.lee.fa...@gmail.com> March 5, 2020 at 3:42 PM Dear Sugar Labs Devel Community, My name is Christian “Chip” Faris and I am activ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal to move communication to other platform

Srevin, Srevin Saju March 4, 2020 at 10:07 AM I agree to Prashant. To me Slack seems to be a viable option, and indeed popular too. But unfortunately due to historical reasons, we might not move to another platform. Nevertheless, it might be of interest to other dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal to move communication to other platform

Prashant, We also offer our own Sugar Labs specific IRC chat gateway, at http://chat.sugarlabs.org:9090/ I'd like to understand more fully why you believe IRC is hard for you to use. Is it hard because you've never used it before? Is it hard because you have no familiarity with it? IRC can a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Running Sugar Activities

Soham, Two details we'll need which are missing from your report are: which version of Sugar do you have installed, and how are you installing the activities? On 3/1/2020 2:35:34 AM, soham bhattacharya <116cs0...@nitrkl.ac.in> wrote: Hi, I am Soham. I am running Sugar on Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. I al

Re: [Sugar-devel] Joining Sugar Labs

Abhay, Permission to "Join" Sugar Labs is not needed. Your contributions are all that matters, in whatever form that takes. What are your abilities? How would you like to contribute? Those are the questions that matter :) That said, if you would like to become a member, here is the forma pro

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Advocacy for Arch Linux

ora. Regardless, anyone is free to contribute as they choose, but asking us to focus efforts to $favoritePreferredDistro doesn't necessarily serve to benefit the community as a whole. Regards, Alex Perez Srevin Saju <mailto:srevi...@gmail.com> February 4, 2020 at 8:17 AM I have n

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding IRC channels

Garvit, There are hundreds of free IRC clients out there, for every operating system under the sun. mIRC is not necessarily the best option. Here's one I know is pretty decent: https://www.adiirc.com/ Garvit Gupta December 15, 2019 at 8:59 AM Can you suggest

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issues in building sugar

You probably need to install autoconf-dev or autoconf-devel. Googling the error would likely have led you to this conclusion. Garvit Gupta December 15, 2019 at 9:11 AM As given in the document for building sugar, while running the autogen.sh file the below erro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Browse-157.5

James, Is the " For Fedora 18 systems only," item correct? If so, which version of Browse should we be using with 0.116 on non-F18 platforms? Sugar Labs Activities November 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4024 Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Bug 1737929] sugar depends on Python 2

Right, and the goal for Fedora 32 is to eliminate all of those activities. They either get patched/ported, or dropped as a packaged activity within Fedora, so we don't need any dependency on Python 2, which is going away. Any activity that depends on something as simple as python2-simplejson, f

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] From OLPC XO To Positivo: Rwanda Sets The Bar Higher

It would be good and helpful to attempt to make contact with anyone within Rwanda that is using Sugar on Positivos, official or otherwise, but also anyone who is involved with the official distribution of Positivos within Rwanda. Can you help us on this front, Samson? Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] translate.sugarlabs.org is back up and running

I fixed translate.sugarlabs.org this morning. Deepak Kumar wrote on 11/12/19 4:29 AM: Thanks a lot James for the details.  I will check it out on wiki and inform if I found something related to it. On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm James Cameron, > wrote: Yes, I said

[Sugar-devel] Continued packet loss to MIT Media Lab-hosted Sugar Labs web servers may be resolved

e MIT is. If anybody has any questions, please feel free to e-mail me directly. Regards, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Motion re GSoC Mentor Summit 2019

+1 Walter Bender wrote on 7/16/19 1:06 PM: As per Rahul's request below, we need to decide on whether or not to support the GSoC 2019 mentor summit travel for Rahul, Ibiam, and Tarun. (We can send up to 3 mentors to the summit (including a GCI representative). Google provides US $1100 stipend

Re: [Sugar-devel] Grayscale screen implementation query

Sumit, Sumit Srivastava wrote on 6/3/19 12:18 PM: Hi, all! Here's a query that has been directed at me on the internet, however I don't have any idea about the grayscale implementation of the screen in XO-1. How does it switch from colour to grayscale and on what basis is it decided? On XO h

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] GCI summit travel

+1 from me, we should arrange to meet up while you are here. Is the summit in Mountain View? Walter Bender wrote on 5/28/19 7:07 PM: I've been selected by the GCI winners to represent SL at the summit next month. Google has provided US $1500 for travel (all other expenses are directly covered

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unable to locate source package for sugar-toolkit (Native Installation of sugar v0.114)

James Cameron wrote on 5/22/19 7:01 PM: Thanks for reporting this. Whether it works or not depends on the version of Debian or Ubuntu you are using. The sugar-toolkit module is for GTK 2, and was last packaged; * for Debian 9 (Stretch), * for Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial). It was dropped because Rs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Help] Connect two french students with OLPC deployments in various countries?

Bastien, Thanks for reaching out. Do you know which specific version of XO laptops these students were/will be given? Is the e-mail address you CC'ed when you e-mailed sugar-devel the address of one of the students you mention? Joining and e-mailing i...@lists.sugarlabs.org may yield more us

Re: [Sugar-devel] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM: That's unfortunate. Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing. Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release? They were, but only in QEMU, it would seem. The temporary workaround is to fetch the initramfs referenced below, and then, after

[Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

Folks, Six years and ~two months ago, way back in March of 2013, the then-current SLOBs decided to make "the next release" version 1.0. This didn't happen, and instead, 0.99.0 was released on 2013-06-27 instead. Seehttps://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2013-03-21 I'd

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian 10 (Buster)?

There are two errors in this log file: sh: 1: glib-compile-schemas: not found and gi.repository.GLib.Error: g-file-error-quark: Failed to open file “/home/jelkner/.sugar/default/org.laptop.WebActivity/data/schemas/gschemas.compiled”: open() failed: No such file or directory (4) |Try sudo apt

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian 10 (Buster)?

nfamiliar territory, especially the first time. Using something like Etcher, Fedora Image Writer (for Fedora, obviously) takes away most of the uncertainty for first time users. Regards, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar on Debian 10 (Buster)?

Jeff, Most, if not all, of the Sugar-specific bugs that are present in Debian should be fixed if you use the "0.112-3" (the 3 is critically important) Debian packages from the _unstable_ Debian repo. They have not yet been promoted to testing, and will likely not be included in Debian 10 when

Re: [Sugar-devel] Toolkit Installation Sugar v0.113

Aniket, You have hit a known bug for 0.113. Please see https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/issues/822 I should also point out that this was an easily search-able issue, and would encourage you to use Google or your preferred search engine, when you encounter issues like this in the future.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Meeting reminder: Sugar Dashboard (GSoC)

Hrishi, Can you respond here with your github username, and where you intend your blog posts to live? I would like to add this information to the wiki page of accepted GSoC 2019 projects at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=GSoC/2019/Accepted_Proposals Hrishi Patel wrote on 5/10/19

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Outreach Plans 2019 - PyCon Cleveland (Tony Anderson)

Lionel, Lionel Laské wrote on 4/15/19 2:37 AM: Hi Tony, +1 on this. BTW Sugar/Python is not the only way to grow user base. For your information, we're currently deploying Sugarizer in 3 schools in the Saint-Ouen city near Paris. It means about 150 Android tablets with Sugarizer OS installe

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 30 (Release Candidate 1) SoaS images ready for testing

of Fedora 30 is expected to be made between April 30th and May 7th, depending on a number of factors. The F30 release schedule is documented at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule Regards, Alex Perez Sugar Labs Oversight Board Member _

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs presence at PyCon (was: Re: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 126, Issue 52)

meeting, as well as ask questions before and after. Regards, Alex Perez paul hunter wrote on 4/13/19 11:20 AM: In my opinion, representing Sugar at PyCon would be a great idea. I really would like to get my hands on any archive if available On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:30 PM <mailto:sugar-de

Re: [Sugar-devel] SpellCheck for write activity project

Jake, I would personally like to encourage you to not re-implement the wheel. Aspell has been around for a long time, quite possibly longer than you've been alive, and has python bindings, and a C API: See https://pypi.org/project/aspell-python-py3/ and https://github.com/WojciechMula/aspell-

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] What's the long term vision of Sugar Labs?

Sumit, Great questions, and they're particularly relevant at this phase/age of the existence of Sugar Labs. They certainly can't be answered in a single e-mail, however I think this is a perfect conversation to have, particularly on our IAEP mailing list, which is our general purpose mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Sugar 0.113 unstable

James, Apologies for the thread hijacking, but I feel it's appropriate... FYI, I have just discovered that collaboration in Sugar under 0.112 + Ubuntu 19.04 is also broken. We must get this fixed before we can release the stable 0.114. See https://termbin.com/qtkh James Cameron wrote on 3/1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration Between Activities Fail with Fedora 29 SoaS

Samson, Based on my previous conversations with you, you had indicated you were using Fedora 29 32-bit SoaS. Please confirm that this is still the case. I have changed the subject line to reflect this. I believe you are encountering the issue which we thought we had fixed with a previous pat

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] Announcing Season of Docs 2019

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:01:07PM -0700, Alex Perez wrote: I saw this as well, and thought the same thing. We should definitely try to develop some better user-facing documentation, for those _new_ to Sugar. Walter Bender wrote on 3/11/19 3:43 PM: Could be quite useful. -- F

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] Announcing Season of Docs 2019

I saw this as well, and thought the same thing. We should definitely try to develop some better user-facing documentation, for those _new_ to Sugar. Walter Bender wrote on 3/11/19 3:43 PM: Could be quite useful. -- Forwarded message - From: *'sttaylor' via Google Summer of Code

Re: [Sugar-devel] IRC Channel

tes, ask a single question, and then disappear. This is not helpful behavior, nor is it conducive to getting responses. Remember, we are all globally distributed. IRC is not a replacement for e-mail lists. Please do not treat it as such. Regards, Alex Perez Sugar Labs Oversight Board Member Sumit

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to add activities to Sugarizer on Android

Evert, Evert Groenewald wrote on 3/3/19 11:06 PM: Hallo List I have installed Sugarizer from F-Droid to my phone and would like to know how to go about adding additional activities. I would like to add a chess activity for instance. On the OLPC it is easy to add activities. Actually, it's not j

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] GCI'18 Report

Yes, thank you sincerely for this report...my thoughts/responses are inline... Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote on 1/31/19 6:38 AM: Hi Everyone, This is a report about last year's GCI. 674 students participated. Of those, 245 completed at least one task. This works out to just over 36% of the "partic

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sl.org Down?

Not just you. It is down, and we are having a problem with this particular host. I am working on resolving it today. Samson Goddy wrote on 1/26/19 2:47 AM: Hello, Is it just me or is https://www.sugarlabs.org down? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Suggestion on moving from IRC to Gitter

As an oversight board member, for all the same reasons cited below, I am 100% _not_ in favor of this proposal. It's a crude attempt at re-implementing IRC, and despite being open-source, is effectively a proprietary service, which there is no guarantee of continued support for. If you want to o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs 2018-2020 Oversight Board Election Results

3:01 AM Hello, 43 out of 167 Sugar Labs member voted during the Sugar Labs 2018-2020 Election. Congratulations to the winners who have been selected for the 2018-2020 period: 1. *Walter Bender* 2. *James Cameron* 3. *Lionel Laské* *4. Alex Perez * *5. Devin Ulibarri* * * Results are availabl

Re: [Sugar-devel] Install sucrose

er 10, 2018 at 9:35 AM Hi, Alex I used https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/ubuntu.md. Tony On 12/10/18 5:12 PM, Alex Perez wrote: ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Install sucrose

ually cite the content you are referencing here. Regards, Alex Perez Tony Anderson <mailto:tony_ander...@usa.net> December 10, 2018 at 8:48 AM Hi, James Alex Perez identified the problem correctly. I needed to run: sudo apt-get update before sudo apt install sucrose For me, the real

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Tidying up; images from 2010 to 2012

Assuming there _was_ a resistance factor is probably not a good idea :) I'm not really sure why it matters, even if there was one, either. Anmol Mishra December 8, 2018 at 6:15 AM I would like to ask If these images are from 2010-2012, why weren't they delet

Re: [Sugar-devel] Install sucrose

ny_ander...@usa.net> December 1, 2018 at 9:00 PM Hi Alex, Thanks, I'll give that a try. I had suspected that the instructions on the Sugar wiki were not complete. We spent time changing the markup to gitHub but apparently not time testing the instructions. Tony On 12/1/18 6:12 PM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Install sucrose

Tony, It sounds like you do not have the 'universe' apt repository enabled, since this is where the sucrose package lives, according to https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/sucrose With Ubuntu 18.04, you should just be able to run "sudo add-apt-repository universe" and enable it. Tony Anderso

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Announcement of the candicacy of Lionel Laské for SLOB

an open source project (these words to not appear anywhere on the Sugar Labs landing page). Regards, Alex Perez Lionel Laské <mailto:lionel.la...@gmail.com> November 27, 2018 at 9:02 AM Hi all, I'm proud to be candidate for the SugarLabs Oversight Board election. Find more about

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Announcement of the candidacy of Alex Perez (was: Stage II November: Election)

I hereby announce my candidacy. Please ask any questions you may have, and read more at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2018-2020-candidates/Alex_Perez Samson Goddy November 19, 2018 at 7:24 AM Greetings, Sugar Lab's Elections and Membership Commit

[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [sugar-devel] Wiki Page created for all Sugar Labs 2018 Goal Submissions

ideas, using the links to add details to each specific sub-page. Regards, Alex Perez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] licensing question

Folks, These attitudes are totally unhelpful, and I urge you to drop it, stop hurling insults. To be honest, I think both of you have valid points, and for the time being, I am not a fan of shutting down the legacy ASLO, until we have data that it's _really_ not being used. Removing the link

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

On this subject, I may have missed this, but where did the (IMHO awful) "feet" icon come from, who approved its use, and was the board involved with the decision? It seems a fairly central branding decision. Walter Bender Wednesday, September 13, 2017 5:49 AM R

Re: [Sugar-devel] Minor update to Make Your Own Sugar Activities!

Tony/Walter, > On Mar 13, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > > Tony, > > Not sure I agree about your asserts regarding github vs gitroious. Count me in here.. > > (1) the were/are many activities that were not hosted in gitorious long > before we switched to github, so it wasn't obviou

Re: [Sugar-devel] [XSCE] Sugar 0.110 (Build 20) shows unexplained stoppage of io on removable drives

Tony, > On Jan 3, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > > I have spent hours in the past few days coping with io failures while > installing rpms and copying large files from usb sticks. The problem has also > affects sd cards. Which XO hardware version? 1? Which OLPC OS/kernel version? T

Re: [Sugar-devel] Code In: Having trouble setting up Dev Environment

Santi, > On Dec 20, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Santi Acq wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Yesterday I claimed the Beginner task "Install the Sugar development > environment" in which I am supposed to followed this instructions > "https://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html >

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

Walter, > On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > > I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps > failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone > else experiencing this problem? > That package no longer exists in Fedora 25.