Thanks to you!
I'm glad to be here.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Thanks Code!
2014-01-31 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hello,
this is just to let everyone know Code Raguet has kindly accepted to join
the sugar core team of reviewers
also, at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Welcome_to_the_Sugar_Labs_wiki
there is a link to
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.htmlthat, I think,
it should point to
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Hi there, I have an ARM (QEMUed) slave ready to use thanks @aklis.
Daniel, would you help me to set it up?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Code Raguet
irag...@activitycentral.comwrote:
thanks!
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Thinking again
thanks!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com
wrote:
also, at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Welcome_to_the_Sugar_Labs_wiki
there is a link to
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
* sugar-web uses semantic versioning.
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
what about something like this http://semver.org/?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 January 2014 18:21, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2014/1/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
IMO it should be deprecated and then removed at some
is nice for
build isolation and to support multiple distribution versions on a single
machine. Plus we have mockremote which we can reuse.
For completeness :)
On Thursday, 9 January 2014, Code Raguet wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
I'd try
Hi, Emil. Awesome work!
I'd like to collaborate with the collaboration.js API design and
implementation.
I'll ping at IRC
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Emil Dudev emildu...@gmail.com wrote:
After a lot of debugging of javascript, I'm finally able to show a small
preview of what
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
* I still need to improve the queue to skip builds when we have more
recent commits. That will probably happen because the ARM slave is super
slow.
* I want to find a better machine to run the ARM builds, they take
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd try with the XO first because I suspect that will be pretty fast.
yup, it should. It's a good idea.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
I wonder if would not be a good idea add a repository property in the
activity.info file
+1
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Hi, Laurent
would you paste the contents of your activity.info?
activity/activity.info
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:19 AM, laurent bernabe
laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
After having pulled the latest sugar-build yesterday, I made a new web
activity just in order to get used
for having pointed me the problem with my Activity. (I
have not corrected it yet, but no doubt that the problem comes from here)
Apolozing, as I haven't developped many applications for Sugar yet, so I
haven't got yet the good practises.
Regards
2014/1/7 Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com
an acticity scheme in sugar-web-test
that (internaly) replaces de request.uri with http.
But I don know if this is possible... (I'm a newbie with webkit)
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Code Raguet ignacio.c...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv
We should not set window.top.sugar = {} from the javascript side. Instead
we should if isStandalone callback({}).
yes, we are on it
My point in this thread is:
*should we develop thread-safe code when handling window.top props???*
chrome: not mandatory
opera: yes, we should
webkit:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
chrome: not mandatory
But likely to be mandatory in the not too distant future.
are you sure about this?
I thought that browsers were moving towards single-thread with webworkers
API when parallelism is needed.
I
I was looking at _app_scheme_cb... just wondering
if would be a easiest way.
Certainly, you user-agent idea is far simpler than this.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Code Raguet ignacio.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I know for sure that they are working on this
http://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/oop-iframes
I don't know for sure if js could be single threaded despite that.
thanks
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you explain where multi thread would be an issue in our code? Why I'm
thinking perhaps simplistically is that we are already dealing with the
window.sugar stuff being available asyncronously.
Yes, we dealt with
I've read the following, recently:
[...]
In Opera, every window has its own JavaScript thread. This includes
windows in iframes. The consequence is that event handlers initiated from
different frames might execute at the same time. If these simultaneous
scripts modify shared data (like
Only on the first save().
Using getEnv().defaultTimeoutInterval = something we could increase the
timeout for all the datastore tests or even for all the tests. I'm worried
it would get a bit annoying for development to always have a big timeout...
Perhaps we should do as in env.js...
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Rogelio Mita
rogeliom...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Then we can do:
- separate this functional tests on another file and run it on full-master
maybe for first approach?
better in quick-master, IMHO. Doubling the timeouts it's annoying for
humans but robots,
Very interesting...
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
http://hood.ie/
specially for data storing, authentication, and its offliine-first
philosophy.
I'm sorry I don't find time for Sugar lately, I will be back into
hacking, reviewing and
Today it failed again, but in two tests:
- datastore object should be able to set and get metadata
- datastore object should be able to save and load text
both from datastore and due to timeout
log excerpt:
[1A[2KChrome 25.0 (Linux) datastore object should be able to set and get
metadata
BTW: gwebsockets's log shows no error
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.comwrote:
Today it failed again, but in two tests:
- datastore object should be able to set and get metadata
- datastore object should be able to save and load text
both from
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
After I cleaned disk, it always succeeded so far.
Nice! Green again :D
Let's see when/how it fails again, I guess. But let me know if you want
access to the slaves.
+ 1
Thank, Daniel!
And, of course, next time I
...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
On 6 December 2013 18:15, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com wrote:
Daniel, I've sent a tiny patch for osbuild.
Can you review it, please?
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com
wrote:
Thanks, I'll sniff around that and I'll try
Congratulations, Agustín Zubiaga!
Nice work kickstarting and mentoring this kind of students, Flavio, Gonzalo
and Manuel!
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Flavio Danesse fdane...@gmail.com wrote:
[image: Imágenes integradas 1]
web https://sites.google.com/site/pythonjoven/
pull, so that it's available in the log... I'll see if I can get at
it or patches welcome of course... Should probably go in _pull_module
https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/master/osbuild/build.py
On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote:
yesterday, before Gonzalo has fixed buildbot
I've not said nothing yet because I'm not sure what to say.
Certainly, I don't like the idea of having two versions of webkit, but I
understand that this would be a temporal workaround.
Daniel said:
I'm unconvinced that it will be a short term workaround. It will be hard
to get rid of.
+1
it looks good! :)
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
What should we do to have something similar on python api?
what about this?
http://fitzgen.github.io/pycco/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
yesterday, before Gonzalo has fixed buildbot, I wanted to help with this
and I was willing to run a git bisect. Some submodule HEADs were broken
and I needed a revision (commit SHA) of those where a build had been
succesful.
Looking at quick-master builder I found that build #23 was the last
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Those are hard questions :) I was also thinking about compatibility with
old sugar-toolkit-gtk3 versions when we change stuff like getEnvironment.
For future changes on this, we add some unitttest, so refactoring should
33 matches
Mail list logo
