The impact of redesigning the Sugar Labs websites on the Sugar Labs mission
can be huge, because it could increase the amount of people who pass
through the 'contribution funnel', transitioning from the many people who
are casually browsing the site to those who are active contributors to the
proje
If the Turtle Confusion and Flag porting to JavaScript project is
successfully completed, the impact on the Sugar Labs community will be
another solid contribution to the increasing number of Sugarizer activities
that ensure children can learn with any computer that supports HTML5 (such
as tablets
On 26 March 2016 at 10:04, Utkarsh Tiwari
wrote:
> Sir I didn't get you?
>
He meant he edited the SVG by hand in a text editor, in this case emacs
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-de
On 30 March 2016 at 21:27, Adam Holt wrote:
> the above is just a proposal
I think this is a very wise proposal :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 30 March 2016 at 15:56, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
> As I said at last meeting, I would like to add a topic regarding "Sugar
> vision".
> Will share a document proposal.
>
I am very eager to see your draft!! :D
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@li
On 31 March 2016 at 20:27, Walter Bender wrote:
> SFC
(BTW, the Software Freedom Conservancy is asking everyone to refer to it as
"Conservancy" and not "SFC" to prevent ambiguity)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lis
Hi
In the thread '[Sugar-devel] Wanted: Record activity port to GStreamer
0.10' today James Cameron wrote:
for the future of Sugar Labs, they should be concentrating on
> later designs than one from 2007 that is no longer available and
> rapidly dying from old age.
>
I just got a XO-1, so I won
Hi
On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy wrote:
> I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the
> meeting tomorrow. the meeting is 8pm by nigerian time and the cyber
> cafe i will using closes by 9pm. so i dont want to miss out.
>
On 1 April 2016 at 11:03, Laura Vargas
Great work Utkarsh! I have made some comments on the PR :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi
When sugar git moved from http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-old to
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar in 2013, why did issue tracking stay at
bugs.sugarlabs.org and not move to https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/issues
?
I think it would be a good idea to move the issues, since pull requests can
On 2 April 2016 at 23:46, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> The translators hired by the Ministry of Education were surprised and
> distressed when they started noticing Edgar was *overwriting *the updated
> translations they were doing.
>
It seems Pootle is currently configured to encourage such surpris
On 2 April 2016 at 22:21, Walter Bender wrote:
> I was just asking (again) the other day
>
Can you provide a URL for where you asked about this? :)
if someone has an issue aggregation tool since our issues are scattered
> across multiple repositories. Presumably we are not the first to have
> b
On 2 April 2016 at 22:18, Tony Anderson wrote:
> The Sugar activities, which represent 90% or more of the Sugar lines of
> code, are being relocated to the github accounts of individual
> developer/maintainers - not under a single Sugar account.
>
I think that is fine :) If they would like to ma
I think this is a good change/feature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi Tony!
On 3 April 2016 at 01:45, Tony Anderson wrote:
> I can't imagine the process is so simple. The overwritten translations
> were probably on translate.sugarlabs.org.
>
Yes, that is the Pootle instance I referred to in my previous email, sorry
that I wasn't clear on this point.
(I had no
Hi
In the github thread, James Cameron mentioned Endless, which seems like
"One Desktop Per Family" :)
I was pleased to see that on https://endlessm.com/developer/ there is,
between links to source code for "hardware" and "installation", a set of
links to source code for *metrics* :)
Since both
Hi James!
On 3 April 2016 at 18:35, James Cameron wrote:
> Because trac provides coverage across multiple repositories, and
> nothing else gave us that feature at the time.
>
This makes good sense, and is good to know :)
> I'm fine with closing down trac, because;
>
> (a) it isn't used in rel
Hi Walter!
On 3 April 2016 at 09:04, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2 April 2016 at 22:21, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>>> I was just asking (again) the other day
>>>
>>
&
On 3 April 2016 at 20:19, Walter Bender wrote:
> FWIW, Endless is shipping some Sugar activities :)
Awesome!
Endless seems extremely aligned with Sugar :)
I'm curious though; how do they ship on some activities, not the whole
desktop?
___
Sugar-deve
On 3 April 2016 at 20:36, James Cameron wrote:
>
> Previous attempts at consolidation have had varying success, as can be
> seen from the increase in fragmentation.
>
> The number of mailing lists, Wiki, Social Help, IRC channels,
> Gitorius, GitHub, ... these are all being used lightly, and the
Hi Walter!
On 3 April 2016 at 20:27, Walter Bender wrote:
> This means we have no users engaging with Sugar Labs through bug
>>> reporting; and that's been my observation for some time.
>>>
>>
>> I feel anxious to read this, and for me this is the primary reason I
>> propose consolidating the mo
On 3 April 2016 at 21:04, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 April 2016 at 20:19, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW, Endless is shipping some Sugar activities :)
>>
>>
>>
On 3 April 2016 at 21:26, James Cameron wrote:
> A wrapper to run activities outside Sugar may be quite useful.
>
I feel kind of like Android is Darth Vader, Sugar is Obi Wan, and Sugarizer
is the Force Ghost Obi Wan ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk3_-JSTdx0
___
On 3 April 2016 at 22:06, James Cameron wrote:
> > I'm curious though; how do they ship on some activities, not the
> whole
> > desktop?
> >
> > They are shipping Turtle Blocks, which will run in GNOME as well as
> the
> > Sugar Desktop. Not sure what other activities they
Hi Sam!
On 3 April 2016 at 01:12, wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> When sugar git moved from http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-old to
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar in 2013, why did issue tracking stay
>
Hi Tony!
On 3 April 2016 at 02:02, Tony Anderson wrote:
> You are proposing, appropriately, a new way to handle version control for
> Sugar.
>
I'm not sure about that :) I didn't intend to :)
> There is documented procedure to add new activities or to update
> activities on ASLO. This procedu
Hi!
On 4 April 2016 at 00:50, Devin Ulibarri wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 12:35 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > Here is why:
> > 1. Control. The community would be able to do what they wish with
> their
> > data. (the other benefits really come from this one)
> &g
Hi James
On 1 April 2016 at 15:06, James Cameron wrote:
> Let me spin you a tail.
>
> The myth of forward human development doesn't apply to software.
>
> This is a parade of people, several walking abreast, beside a slow
> moving flat bed truck, all holding on to a ribbon.
>
> The truck is the
Hi Martin!
On 5 April 2016 at 13:13, Martin Dengler wrote:
>
> On 5 Apr 2016, at 06:37, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi James
>
>
> On 1 April 2016 at 15:06, James Cameron wrote:
>>
>> Do not target a rapidly diminishing enthusiastic group, or the
>> future user
Hi James!
On 5 April 2016 at 19:04, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:37:45AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > Hi James
> >
> > On 1 April 2016 at 15:06, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > Let me spin you
On 5 April 2016 at 20:29, Walter Bender wrote:
> I think the Sugar community has made an extraordinary effort to keep the
> XO-1 experience viable.
I think that the Sugar community OUGHT to keep up that effort. It would be
immoral to abandon 1 million kids who are using XOs.
But I do not think
Hi Samson
Great proposal - and glad to hear you are feeling better :)
I have 2 questions :)
1. You write in the proposal,
the reason why the Yoruba was the most expensive, was because the logistics
Portable internet and internet plan was included, two laptop was included
too.
I am curious abou
On 6 April 2016 at 02:59, wrote:
> You can install GNU on a chromebook, you can install GNU on computer, you
> can install GNU on some tablets. Those are the pedagogic devices of now
> and the future. Those run faster with Gtk than with WebKit.
Will devices running GNU and Sugar desktops get
ChromeOS is a GNU distribution :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hey Jonas
A nice surprise to see you here :)
On 6 April 2016 at 09:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Dave Crossland (2016-04-06 14:42:57)
> > On 6 April 2016 at 02:59, wrote:
> >
> >> You can install GNU on a chromebook, you can install GNU on computer,
> >
On 6 April 2016 at 09:17, Walter Bender wrote:
> the service model that is inherent to the web is really problematic from
> the point of view of children's privacy, security, and freedom.
Naw, it ain't inherent to the model! :)
Off the top of my head, here are 3 projects that adapt the sof
On 6 April 2016 at 09:17, Walter Bender wrote:
> If we can develop within the context of Sugar desktop and the browser, it
> is to a large extent a win-win.
That is the 'great hack' I referred to earlier - I think its copyleft-level
clever stuff :)
I'm not so familiar with GNOME 3, but its JS
On 6 April 2016 at 10:41, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6 April 2016 at 09:17, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>>> the service model that is inherent to the web is really problematic from
>
On 6 April 2016 at 10:48, Martin Dengler wrote:
> Sugar is not a technology.
Ahhh come on man, you know what I mean :) I was pretty clear that I am
talking about https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/graphs/contributors
If you have ever put a UI in front of kids
That is the point. How many kids
On 6 April 2016 at 20:53, Tony Anderson wrote:
> One approach is for the 'cloud' server to emulate the school server.
>
100% agree
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 6 April 2016 at 20:49, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Our need is a deployable device - one that can be purchased in quantities
> of 30+.
> If we develop a technique to install Sugar on such a device, that can be
> done for all of them at
> the time of deployment. So, if anyone can find a suitable tab
d a school server, we already put them to shame.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 04/07/2016 11:24 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
> On 6 April 2016 at 20:49, Tony Anderson wrote:
>
>> Our need is a deployable device - one that can be purchased in quantities
>> of 30+
I think facebook app/game versions of sugar activities is smart marketing,
but I would suggest making them a little limited, to get people hooked on
them, and then telling people to upgrade to the main
http://server.sugarizer.org app to play the next level.
_
ly a few activities as of now
> compared to Sugar, so I guess it would be limited in that way anyways.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> I think facebook app/game versions of sugar activities is smart
>> marketing, but I would suggest making them a
On 7 April 2016 at 10:33, Sean DALY wrote:
> Smart marketing involves identifying a target with an objective, then
> choosing a media channel to touch that target. It's tempting to go the
> other way around and say "facebook is a heavyweight channel, so let's
> concentrate there, and everybody li
On 7 April 2016 at 12:54, Sean DALY wrote:
> As strange as it may sound, effective marketing comes from a rigorous
> approach.
>
Right - one of the top Google marketing partners is
http://www.conversion-rate-experts.com - one of the 2 co-foundners was
previously a rocket science physicist :)
___
Hi Tony!
On 7 April 2016 at 19:14, Tony Anderson wrote:
>
> There are a number of projects to put Linux on Android devices, e.g.
> http://linuxonandroid.org/.
>
Nice! I didn't know it :)
> I could see an openWRT scenario in which there would be an inventory of
> Android products which support
On 7 April 2016 at 10:15, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> The problem with Sugarizer as a shell is that it can only run sugarizer
> Activities (Sugar Web Activities) and not the Android apps. These
> activities are very limited on a first experience.
There was a GSOC proposal to enable it as a shell t
On 6 April 2016 at 17:24, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> How many kids is Sugar targetting?
>>
>> Low millions? Or billions?
>>
>
> A few years ago, I estimated at around 10 million the number of teacher
On 7 April 2016 at 11:53, Walter Bender wrote:
> [1] https://github.com/walterbender/musicblocks/issues
> [2] https://github.com/walterbender/turtleblocksjs/issues
>
I suggest moving these to the github.com/sugarlabs org :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Hi Adam!
On 1 April 2016 at 01:24, Adam Holt wrote:
> In Haiti XO-1s will be dominant across many schools for years and year to
> come. Similar to Tony's description, but these typically will be using
> 32GB SD cards -- thankfully these are incredibly affordable.
>
What is the typical price th
Hi
On 7 April 2016 at 22:04, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> A layer of Scotch tape remedies the trackpad problem in many cases.
>
...
>
The keyboard is more robust than most think. In PY and NE kids repair them
>
On 7 April 2016 at 22:54, Tony Anderson wrote:
> AFIK, the Government of Rwanda annual fiscal year begins July 1. Some one
> may have access to the records, but there are probably 1000 XO-1s deployed
> there. Does any one have an idea of the cost of 1000 32GB SD cards?
>
I expect about $2,000, w
On 7 April 2016 at 23:56, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Amazon quotes about $10 each.
Wholesale?? =)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi Walter!
On 8 April 2016 at 09:26, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 7 April 2016 at 22:04, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Dave Crossland w
Perhaps SVG is better than canvas?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 8 April 2016 at 08:08, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> Does any one have an idea of the cost of 1000 32GB SD cards?
>>>
>>
>> I expect about $2,000, would need some more fishing about in
>> http://www.alib
On 7 April 2016 at 21:43, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 1 April 2016 at 01:24, Adam Holt wrote:
>
>> In Haiti XO-1s will be dominant across many schools for years and year to
>> come. Similar to Tony's description, but these typically will be using
>> 32GB SD
Hi James
On 8 April 2016 at 16:23, Walter Bender wrote:
> What is the typical price the XO-1 units you are prepping for Haiti? Cost
>>> of postage + 32Gb SD card + repair (volunteered labor?) + distribution to
>>> Haiti?
>>>
>>
>> The reason I ask is that it seems to me that sugar labs ought to
Hi
10,000. Okay. How about this?
I suppose a batch of 10,000 costs $200 each from OLPC, that's a $2M capital
outlay.
That's just 10 schools with 4 year groups each, at 250 laptops per year
group.
Finding ten ritzy private primary schools in the US where the parents can
drop $400 in a hat should
On 9 April 2016 at 06:31, James Cameron wrote:
> The XO-4 is in production.
>
What's the minimum order from OLPC? :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 9 April 2016 at 11:26, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> I also agree that $500 does seem excessive, and even inappropriate
FWIW, I thought it was small; it is under minimum wage for some places.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
ht
On 9 April 2016 at 20:30, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> El 09/04/16 a las 09:41, Lionel Laské escribió:
> > Sugarizer OS will take the place of the Google/Amazon Launcher so
> > users will be able to launch both Sugarizer and Android application.
>
> Interestingly, this is a feature that Sugar on GNU/
On 8 April 2016 at 16:23, Walter Bender wrote:
> Just need a mechanism for accessing a supply of XO-4s...
>
>>
Who has bought XO-4s, and in what quantities?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote:
> Back in that pre-Twitter era when it was somehow considered Perfectly Ok
> and Normal to step on one's one community, as nothing more than pretty
> Give1Get1 fundraising whores.
CoC language fail :)
___
Su
On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote:
> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in
> community-driven revenue
I don't understand this. What are you referring to? :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.
Hi James!
Brilliant answer, thank you :)
On 10 April 2016 at 18:26, James Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:47:35AM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On 9 April 2016 at 06:31, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > The XO-4 is
Hi Adam
On 10 April 2016 at 22:05, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2016 9:37 PM, "Dave Crossland" wrote:
> >
> > On 10 April 2016 at 20:35, Adam Holt wrote:
> >>
> >> Just imagine if OLPC had not chosen to run off with $40 Millon in
> community-
On 8 April 2016 at 09:26, Walter Bender wrote:
> the XO-4 was the machine we aspired to build in 2006-7
That's a powerful quote, I think :)
But it seems premature for use of the past-tense - XO-4s are available
today brand new in modest quantities. Or do you think there is a need for
an XO-5 w
On 11 April 2016 at 05:04, James Cameron wrote:
> OLPC, Inc. Not OLPC Association. Anybody who has referred to
> Association is talking about a previous organisation.
>
I'm still getting my bearings with all this. The foundation and the
association have closed, but the Inc is still operating.
Hi Laura!
Thanks for the spreadsheet - this is great!
On 10 April 2016 at 23:57, Laura Vargas wrote:
> According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the
> information published by you) for the last 4 years, ~80% (USD$26,400) of
> expenses are related to promotional travel
Hi
On 11 April 2016 at 10:41, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> Are you saying that some corresponding laptops were NOT given to poor
>> kids as promised, and the foundation just netted the cash? :)
>>
>
> [
On 11 April 2016 at 13:35, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 11 April 2016 at 10:41, Adam Holt wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>>
>>
I also am suffering from this :(
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 12 April 2016 at 08:16, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Tony Anderson
> wrote:
>
>> One development that seems to be ignored on these lists is Microsoft's
>> announcement that it will support Bash on Windows 10. As I understand it,
>> the goal is to be able to run Ubuntu
On 12 April 2016 at 19:59, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Bash would not have graphics, but as I understood it Bash would be used to
> launch Linux programs which would presumably have access to a Window.
I think users will still need to install and run an X server to run unix
GUI programs; but there a
I am now able to moderate bugs, and all pending bug submissions are now
approved.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 12 April 2016 at 21:05, James Cameron wrote:
> The question at hand is whether the new screenshot dialog from Utkarsh
> should be styled like the wireless password dialog, or styled like My
> Settings.
>
Seems to me the "My Settings" style is better.
__
I LOVE IT :D
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi Justin
I was also astonished to learn that Sugar is still going last month, but
the community is pretty active still, I agree with what Tony said :)
On 18 April 2016 at 00:03, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Very much so. Currently the focus is writing activities using javascript
> (sugar-web-activit
Hi
On 18 April 2016 at 00:03, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Very much so. Currently the focus is writing activities using javascript
> (sugar-web-activities). These activities work in Sugar exactly as do the
> Python-base activities. They also work on Sugarizer requiring only a
> standard browser. New
On 18 April 2016 at 11:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Etoys is arguably a World of activities.
>
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice.
Let me put this another way: I am new to SmallTalk and it makes grand
claims, yet I can not see much real world impact.
It seems like it
On 18 April 2016 at 16:01, Justin Overton wrote:
> Is this the correct place for the current javascript development?
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web
>
That's the python wrapper that allows web-platform activities to run within
a full Sugar Desktop.
There's also a js wrapper that allows
On 18 April 2016 at 17:48, James Cameron wrote:
> help.sugarlabs.org
>
How is this generated?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi
On 18 April 2016 at 15:04, Juan Carlos Murillo
wrote:
>
> In addition to Sugar Labs main webpage, Wiki, Planet, and the Translation
> webpages, which other websites do you think will need to be redesigned?
>
I would prioritize/order them as: homepage, activities.sugarlabs.org, wiki,
lists, p
Hi
On 18 April 2016 at 18:21, Sam P. wrote:
> Content is genuinely the most important. No matter how nice your design
> is, no new visitor will be able to get what sugarlabs is by looking at your
> site - it simply doesn't say it!
I agree 100%, however, as I understood it, I think Juan Carlos
Hi Gonzalo
Could you help explain this? :)
On 18 April 2016 at 19:33, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:37:49PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> >
> > On 18 April 2016 at 17:48, James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > [2]
On 18 April 2016 at 22:00, Tony Anderson wrote:
> OLE Nepal later converted the squeak activities to html5/javascript
> because to speed up execution and reduce the memory size of the activities.
THAT is interesting! :) Thanks!
___
Sugar-devel mailing
On 19 April 2016 at 04:47, Sean DALY wrote:
> Hopefully the MIT Sloan conclusions will be taken into account
>
Yes, https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team#MIT_Sloan_MarketLab_Study
is GREAT! :)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugar
On 19 April 2016 at 15:01, Sanchit Bansal wrote:
> How do you guys like the slider to the show the three main images of the
> website or I should do something else ?
>
> What do you think ?
>
If the images are in a scrolling page that is simple - like today - or
fading in, like https://www.withc
On 19 April 2016 at 22:19, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Sebastian Silva has just given us a way to leverage the library of Sugar
> activities outside of Sugar, another way to extend the benefits of the
> Sugar community.
This is https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/FreeDesktop_integration and
is li
Hi!
I'm adding back the list - I feel annoyed
that the SL lists are currently configured for reply-to-sender-only, but
the systems team rejected my proposal to change this. Does it bother you?
:)
The other question I'm curious to ask you is, would you buy an XO-4 for
your kids if they were avail
On 19 April 2016 at 23:14, Justin Overton wrote:
> I did look to see if I could find a way to buy an XO-4, but I ended up
> rooting my chromebook instead. It mostly runs fine on the chromebook, but
> several of the apps don't work. EToys, Speech, and a couple of others.
Cool!
I think Sugar Lab
On 20 April 2016 at 04:59, Love Mehta wrote:
> I was feeling really dumb after not being able to find any bugs I could
> work on.
>
I'm glad you would speak on this list to say that - another good reason for
shutting down trac and moving the issue tracking to github since the source
code is ther
e it is contentious, it requires a SLOBs vote.
I'll draft a motion.
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Dave Crossland
Date: 20 April 2016 at 08:28
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Any js related beginner bugs that I can work on
To: sugar-devel
On 20 April 2016 at 04:59, Love Mehta wrote:
On 20 April 2016 at 01:52, Sam Parkinson wrote:
>
> But Gtk+ is actually fine.
>
Does it run on iOS and Android?
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Hi Manash!
On 20 April 2016 at 01:04, Manash Raja wrote:
> I would like to add a few thoughts.
>
Thank you! :D
> I am a new member to the community and from my personal experience I found
> that when it comes to contribution, it is quite difficult at the beginning
> to align with the vision o
On 20 April 2016 at 00:48, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:33:44PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > Interestingly OLPC also offer XO-4s today with either Fedora+Sugar,
> > or Android, or Windows XP.
>
> No, we only build them with Fedora + Sugar + Gnom
Hi Utkash!
It is too late, but don't worry :)
On 20 April 2016 at 08:44, Utkarsh Tiwari
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess it's too late for this but I couldn't add the 'screenshot'
> popup prototype I developed to my proposal :( Is there anything I
> could do fix it?
>
> Regards,
> Utkarsh Tiwari
>
Hi
On 20 April 2016 at 08:35, Walter Bender wrote:
> While SLOB can vote on this, personally I think it is up to the developer
> community to decide.
Sure, that's reasonable. How does the developer community resolve
conflicts?
> Can you summarize the recent discussion to date and ask for a t
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
