or
> web services tests.
>
>
> On 5 August 2013 09:46, Miguel González
> wrote:
>
>> I also think this is the best approach.
>>
>> Please, note that these files also have
>> "sys.path.append(config.ext_path)":
>>
>> tests/views/webaccount
t and I'm not seeing it in the
>> output. python is 2.7.5, not really sure what is going on.
>>
>>
>> On 30 July 2013 16:53, Miguel González
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Gonzalo, what version of python do you use?
>>>
>>> sys.path is modifie
ll log: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/28781/29226137/
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>>>
>>> Weird. Master or chroot branch? It would be good to post the full trace.
>>>
>&g
Good news! Thank you very much!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Fixed, gconf was not working at all in the chroot branch. Your tests are
> all passing now!
>
>
> On 29 July 2013 12:51, Miguel González wrote:
>
>> OK. Please, take into account I
> Thanks.
>
>
> On 29 July 2013 10:44, Miguel González wrote:
>
>>
>> Here is my patch: it checks if language code is not defined and use
>> default values in that case.
>>
>> [https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/71]
>>
>> diff --git
wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> I think I misunderstood your analysis of the issue. sugar-build sets LANG
> to C and I think that's something that should be supported... So I think we
> should go with 2 in your list of alternatives.
>
>
> On Monday, 29 July 2013, Miguel Gonzál
has been set. So
>> I'd go for 1.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 24 July 2013, Miguel González wrote:
>>
>>> In this case in extensions/cpsection/modemconfiguration/model.py:299
>>>
>
till failing. Could that error be due to non functional gconf?
>
>
> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick/builds/46/steps/shell_2/logs/log
>
> I see a gconf error earlier in the log. I haven't yet looked at what is
> going on with it. Maybe just a missing dependency.
>
>
&g
"telepathy-gabble",
+"mobile-broadband-provider-info",
"gnome-themes-standard",
"xorg-x11-drv-evdev",
"xorg-x11-drv-modesetting",
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Yes!
&
/41/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/mobile-broadband-provider-info/
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Miguel González <
migonzal...@activitycentral.com> wrote:
> I guess is somethinks like this:
>
> From 47824c6e7622d0a59c4cf7960b97f63ece3d362
; branch).
>
> My fault for forgetting about it when approving the pull request, but I
> can't fix it myself for a few days.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
--
Miguel González
Activity Central: http://www.activitycentral.com
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
t's in python3
> > makes it a no brainer. I think we can just add a dep in sugar-build, no
> need
> > to build it.
>
> Absolutly. Excellent explanation Miguel. Your patch is welcome.
>
> --
> .. manuq ..
>
-
ocale_mock: # (2)
locale_mock.return_value = LOCALE
db = ServiceProvidersDatabase()
country = db.get_country()
self.assertEqual(country.code, default_country_code) # (3)
```
What do you think?
[1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/58
[2] htt
logs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/22/mobile-broadband-assistant-makes-it-easy/
[3]:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/network-manager-applet/tree/src/libnm-gtk/nm-mobile-providers.c
>
> On 2 July 2013 22:49, Miguel González wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just send a pull requ
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:10 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>
> Does the patch choose a default mobile provider? There is one selected
> in the picture. I have now looked at the patch, and cannot find a default.
>
> If there is no previous selection stored in GConf, it guess the country
using default
file?
- I have kind of unitary tests for ServiceProviderDatabase class but I
don't know exactly where to put them. They use mock library to simulate
GConf calls.
- Is it necessary to write functional test for view? Is there information
about how to do it?
Thank you for your attention.
--
ortable with it. We have until the half of August to
> land this, so there is some time to learn.
>
>
> On Thursday, 20 June 2013, Miguel González wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think I can go for enhanced support for 3G modems. Is this possible for
>> a newcome
Hello,
I think I can go for enhanced support for 3G modems. Is this possible for a
newcomer?
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think two of the features on the 0.100 roadmap are in practice
> or
18 matches
Mail list logo
