The Short Version: As many of you might have noticed, my activities within
Sugar Labs have been fading lately. I'd like to take the only responsible
step and hand my responsibilities off.
The Long Version: I didn't expect to see myself writing this email. I'm
currently a student at Olin working re
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Tue, 20-07-2010 a las 03:07 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribió:
>> rgs and myself have ported Browse to pywebkitgtk with all features and
>> we could use some testing.
>>
>> You can get it from here
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/bro
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Lucian Branescu
wrote:
> I've enabled epub view. It requires both python-lxml and
> python-BeautifulSoup installed (for some reason) and none of the
> toolbars work in epub view.
This is awesome - thanks Lucian for getting this to work again! :) I
did build and su
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi Reinier,
>
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 00:45, Reinier Heeres wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> I agree that the AstParser class is a bit scary, but I still believe
>> it's a good ingredient for Calculate: it allows us to do symbolic
>> evaluation of funct
Hi all,
I'd like us to get a coherent way in terms of user interfaces for
creating Sugar on a Stick on as many distributions as possible. I do
have a first iteration of such a release using Fedora's LiveUSB
Creator ready and need some testers with - preferably different -
distributions. There are
Here are the minutes (follow the link at the bottom for the logs):
http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100719_1506.html
Bernie, what's the state of the VM we had been talking about for Mel
and me (I'd really like to have a real bot there).
Points raised:
* Raffael asked about
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 09:37 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió:
>
>> Anything else we would like feedback on?
>>
>>
>> Please also consider http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/503.
>
> I don't know... if we drop the Restart button in
Sorry that it took me a bit to reply. Catching up on email backlog
once again. I dropped a couple of replies inline. :)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> Excerpts from Sebastian Dziallas's message of Sun Jun 27 21:07:11 +0200 2010:
>
>> I've been working on an integration of
I've been working on an integration of Smolt
(https://fedorahosted.org/smolt/) into Sugar as part of my GSoC. The
purpose of this is to help us gather information about the hardware
Sugar is running on, as well as to help users filing bug reports to
simplify the process of providing said informatio
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
>
> I just made a 4 GB USB with persistence from soas-i386-20100623.03.iso
> In testing:
> Read 86, it still fails to start
> log showed unable to find/open evince
[...]
Read does not work because the way it interacts with evince has
chan
I'm moving this from IAEP to sugar-devel. Aleksey, do you have an idea
what's going on here? I haven't tried GCompris in SoaS lately, but
could this be 0sugar-related?
--Sebastian
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Werner Westermann wrote:
> Hello, regards from Chile.
>
> Working with a teacher,
ugar on a Stick releases and look forward to working with you!
Please email the SoaS list or our release team with any concerns.
--Sebastian Dziallas
[1] http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100607_1510.html
[2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS_Activity_Criteria
[3]
http://wiki.s
w.agriculturalproductsindia.com/fruits/fruits-jamun.html
>
> Regards
>
> Harriet
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>> > Sebastian, I
ick meeting.
--Sebastian
> Sean
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> We'd like to kick off the process for the upcoming Sugar on a Stick
>> v.4 already, while gearing up for the SoaS PR at LinuxTag, too. And so
>> we're
We'd like to kick off the process for the upcoming Sugar on a Stick
v.4 already, while gearing up for the SoaS PR at LinuxTag, too. And so
we're looking forward to your ideas and suggestions on the codename
and colour selections for the next release iteration. These will be
discussed at the next me
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 7:22 PM, samy boutayeb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to use the Read activity (version 86) in Mirabelle (either
> running from within Virtualbox & on a USB stick) and got the following
> error: "Failed to start".
>
> However, the same activity (same version) do launch and opens
ally to the Sugar on a Stick team and all the people
involved for their awesome work on this release!
Sebastian Dziallas
Sugar on a Stick Project Lead
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Thomas C Gilliard
wrote:
> Yes it has jabber.sugarlabs.org in Control Panel / Network
It looks very much like this, which seems to be pretty much a blocker,
yup: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585413
> Tom Gilliard
> satellit
>
> Peter Robinson wrot
Hi folks,
I have been busy lately and will continue to be for the next couple of
weeks. However, summer possibility exploration happens, too. So. Here's
a GSoC proposal. Comments appreciated! :)
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2010/Improved_Sugar_on_a_Stick
Cheers!
--Sebastian
Hi all,
as you may have noticed, there are a couple of changes coming to Sugar
on a Stick to keep the whole project sustainable. In the upcoming month,
from March 28 (I'll be off starting Sunday night) to May 7, my ability
to devote time to the project will cease. I have to prepare for my major
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing several soas tickets being filed in the sugar component
> (the default one).
>
> Could someone move those to the SoaS component? Also, may be good to
> have a special form/link for filing SoaS bugs so they don't get mixed
> as often?
Sascha did this a coupl
SoaS engineering just proposed a major change-in-direction for the
upcoming (Mirabelle) release. See
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2010-March/000906.html and
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2010-March/002727.html for
more information - the short version is that instead of
Art Hunkins wrote:
> I am unable to test my activities (Our Music, Our Music MC) on recent daily
> builds because Browse doesn't work, and other USB drives are not recognized.
> (The neighborhood view shows nothing except me.) These are my only ready
> ways of getting activities into the system.
B
Art Hunkins wrote:
> It would be most helpful to me to know whether SoaS v3 will be called
> Cloudberry or something else.
This was the original plan, as far as I'm aware. However, the final
release name will be determined through consideration of the various
involved teams, such as the Marketin
Art Hunkins wrote:
> Can we be certain that csound-python is included, please?
>
> Art Hunkins
This is SoaS related, I'd say (and not for Sugar itself).
As stated in a previous e-mail, I've pushed an appropriate commit
earlier [1]. If you want to make sure, you can check the current
kickstart f
Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 22 February 2010 03:13, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> You may want to ask in the soas ml, but in 0.88 we are going to make
>> it easier to users to change the default font size, so apps shouldn't
>> make any assumptions based on a fixed value for that.
>
> But, in the few cases w
James Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:11:02PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> In other news, we're being blocked by licensing issues for some
>> activities and the boot screen, as I've posted before.
>
> I've recently submitted patches to b
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 12.02.2010, at 12:11, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558617
>
> This should als
I've a conflict coming up for the next weeks with our current meeting
time and would need to start something like half an hour later.
If you're interested in attending, please take a second to put down when
you're available here: http://whenisgood.net/fedora-sugar-mtg-1
Make sure to select your
Tim McNamara wrote:
> On 13 February 2010 09:15, Sebastian Dziallas <mailto:sebast...@when.com>> wrote:
>
> If nobody complains by the end of this weekend, I'll just upload the
> images, put a GPLv2+ license in the archive and make a tarball, as this
>
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
>> reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
>> review process requires an application
Hi all,
I'd like to take the chance to hint once more at our tracking bug [1],
as well as the activity wiki page [2]. Recently, TamTam has been posted
for review, too. I'm a little disappointed with the speed we're
progressing with.
Here's a list of the currently most important things we need
James Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:13:40PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
>
> Briefly, how do I swing across to this on an OLPC XO-1.5 that is
> installed with an OLPC F11 build? (There are se
Title says it all, it should be in tomorrows build.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
> reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
> review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
> licensed. I'
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors to work on getting
these clarif
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 30.12.2009, at 00:57, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>> On 30.12.2009, at 00:22, James Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
The changes look okay, though I'd just remove the read-only check,
that should make it w
See you then [1].
--Sebastian
=== Agenda ===
* Deployments
* Packaging Activities
** .tar.bz2 vs. .xo as sources for .rpm files
* Sugar on a Stick
** Bug Trackers
* Open Floor
[1]
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=20&year=2010&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
___
Please join us in #sugar-meeting tomorrow - directly after the SLOBs
meeting (so around 1600 UTC) - for a SoaS meeting. Topic will obviously
be the future of SoaS for v3.
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://l
Hi all,
thanks everybody for attending! It was a great with cool questions and
discussions. We're currently readying the logs, notes and docs which Mel
logged in a GIT repo. So if you're interested in a practical step by
step guide, looking at the repository would already be a good start.
The
hat I know, the
VirtualBox Guest Additions are not in Fedora because they ship a kernel
module and Fedora doesn't permit the inclusion of kernel modules.
Anyway, what I'm basically saying is just that moving work we're doing
anyway (as SoaS, a distributor) upstream is a good thing.
This is it. First meeting after some time, quite some folks joined.
Thanks to all those who dropped by! Here are the minutes and logs:
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.minutes.20091231_1013.html
http://meeting.olpcorps.net/fedora-olpc/fedora-olpc.log.20091231_1013.html
Next d
Walter Bender wrote:
> What channel? #fedora-edu? #sugar-meeting?
Oh, right! I'd say let's just go for #fedora-olpc for now...
See you there!
--Sebastian
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> yo
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
>> latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
>> snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
>>
>> It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, th
Hi all,
you've probably heard the rumor, that SoaS v3 will only ship Fedora
packages. Now let me tell you this: It's true.
What this means is that we can use a lot of help with packaging all
kinds of crazy-awesome activities and other stuff for Fedora - which
will get a Sugar environment with
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
> latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
> snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
>
> It's still bas
Hi everybody,
by popular request, there's now a Sugar on a Stick snapshot with the
latest Sugar development release available. Please note that this
snapshot is already part of our way to Sugar on a Stick v3.
It's still based on F12 for stability reasons, though (this will change
in the develo
tead of "ebooks", but there's a
redirect in place, so both will work.
> What do you think?
That sounds all cool to me!
--Sebastian
> Sean
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>> Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
>>>
>>>
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
>> Confirmed that Read v78 has a "jumpy" cursor issue which can be
>> avoided by reverting back to v77.
>> Can't reproduce crash yet (trying to get hold of a F12 based system).
>
> I can reproduce it us
d would either put effort in
getting the wiki page or the book selection done.
Thanks for the quick reply!
--Sebastian
> Thanks,
> Sayamindu
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is a very quick update on the current state
t;> and can't download vm images.
>> Also, regarding Project Gutenberg EPUBs, they are quite shoddy, so we
>> should really consider whether including them is a nice idea (I can
>> figure out some of the legal issues, but in such a situation it may be
>> prudent n
Hi all,
this is a very quick update on the current state of SoaS v2.
We discovered on Tuesday that we wouldn't be able to ship content due to
legal concerns that was originally intended to be included and discussed
how to proceed in the last two days. Specifically, we won't include
anything th
Carlo Falciola wrote:
> Hi,
> I think that customization support is going to be an key point for Sugar/SOAS
> deployement efforts and for nanaging relationship with field structures. So
> I'm trying to start an effort in order to write down in as much as possible
> detail all the potentially exi
ust need to get to it.
--Sebastian
> thanks
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>> Sean DALY wrote:
>>>
>>> I did manage to generate the .img and .crc files with the
>>> live-iso-t-xo.sh script, but afte
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 24.11.2009, at 22:13, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
>> supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
>> new snapshot r
Hi all,
with the next SoaS release coming up really soon (final image is
supposed to be composed this weekend, release date is Dec 8), there's a
new snapshot ready for you. It includes a lot of fixes and smaller
adjustments. It's currently only available as a general .iso build,
others will pr
Sean DALY wrote:
> I did manage to generate the .img and .crc files with the
> live-iso-t-xo.sh script, but after successful nand-copy of
> soas05xo.img the XO-1 does not boot, freezes at avatar with no dots
> :-(
Sorry for the late reply. I was a bit busy with writing docs and fixing
bugs over t
Jim Simmons wrote:
> Aleksey,
>
> It would be helpful to have a way to distribute things like the
> gstreamer espeak plugin you wrote. Fedora doesn't currently include
> it. It would be even better if you could distribute versions that
> work on the XO running .82, as well as versions for current
Sorry for the late reply... I'm quite behind my e-mail. :/
Just add --nogpg to your yum call, and it should work for now. We're
looking to get this generally to work in Blueberry.
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
> I'd really appreciate a response about this.
>
> On sticks make with snapshots soa
Hi everybody,
after considering input from the various teams involved in Sugar Labs
and the Sugar on a Stick creation, we're shifting the SoaS as followed.
2009-11-17 Fedora 12 Final Release
in the time between: wiki & documentation must be readied!
2009-11-29 Image Gold Master Creation & Up
The file /etc/fedora-release might be where you want to look...
--Sebastian
Art Hunkins wrote:
> I can't seem to find either the lsb_release command, or a file by that name.
>
> Typing "lsb_release" in the Terminal gives me "file not found".
>
> "Find" doesn't locate the file either, nor does a l
Art Hunkins wrote:
> Please do include csound-python. I'd like my new activities to work "right
> out of the box."
On a side-note, we've already included it in the latest SoaS snapshots,
so it'll make it's way into the Blueberry release.
--Sebastian
> Hopefully, doing so will also encourage oth
Hi all,
here's the next snapshot on our way to SoaS v2 Blueberry. This one fixes
some issues and introduces new features, namely:
* the updated FoodForce2, Slideruler and SocialCalc activities
* the gtk-recordmydesktop tool - execute it from the terminal
* new sample content - Alice's Adventures
rk for me last time). However, it
looks like when Kernel Mode Setting is enabled (which is the case by
default), the screen might vanish. Not yet sure what's causing it...
--Sebastian
> Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message - From: "Sebastian Dziallas"
>
> To: &q
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce the availability of a new SoaS snapshot! We're
only one month away from our release, so testing is very much
appreciated to find the latest blockers now.
Get your copy from here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/
This release incorporates the l
Hi everybody,
there is a new, true SoaS snapshot ready for you, awaiting testing. You
can grab it here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/
Note that the XO images have apparently an issue (my fault!), which
prevents them from booting, but will be addressed in the next build.
Anywa
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 14:59, Rawhide Report
> wrote:
>> Compose started at Sat Oct 10 06:15:04 UTC 2009
>>
>> Broken deps for i386
>> --
>> konversation-1.2-1.fc12.i686 requires kdelibs4>= 0:4.3.2
ks to everybody who contributed to these efforts,
--Sebastian Dziallas
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
David Farning wrote:
> As promised, we have started work on the XO operating system SIG at
> Sugar Labs. The SIG pages are at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Xoos .
>
> Based on feedback from the current developers working in this space,
> the most valuable starting point will be to start making dail
After some days of silence, the beast returns [1]. Actually, there's a
new true SoaS snapshot ready for you, awaiting testing eagerly.
It's available for download from here:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/3/SoaS3-200909271154.iso
Note the increased file size, which is the trade-of
Hi all,
so here it is, finally, a mailing list for the Sugar on a Stick project.
If you're interested in its future, technical discussions or just want
to talk about ideas you've, this is the place to go!
Jump in, say hi and introduce yourself - that's it.
Join the fun here: http://lists.sugar
Mel Chua wrote:
> There's a lot going on in this thread, so here is my attempt to
> summarize discussions so far. If I've missed or misstated anything, my
> apologies - and it's a wiki, so go fix it. ;-)
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_on_a_Stick
>
> By my count, there are 4 things we n
Chris Ball wrote:
> Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
> please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
> at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Chris.
Thanks for getting this process off the ground! :)
Well, I'd obvious
ght now. There are probably
more. I would just like to know where I'm investing my work in, since I
am just a volunteer. I don't get money for this.
--Sebastian
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Drake <mailto:d...@laptop.org>> wrote:
>
> 2009/9/16
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> 2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas:
>>> Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
>>> "official" answer on this. Soon.
>>>
>>> Is the curre
Let me rephrase again, to make things clear. I'd love to hear an
"official" answer on this. Soon.
Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a
Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
S
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:47:21PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
>> wrote:
>>> Short Term Action Items:
>>> * We create a SoaS mailing list.
>>> * We establish the SoaS deve
Sean DALY wrote:
> Sebastian, what's your take? Can we "retire" SoaS-{1,2,3} or fold them
> into the public v1, v2 numbers?
Okay, let me shed some light in here, though I think this has already
been discussed in length.
In the early days when I started working on SoaS, we still had internal
bui
tion Items:
* We create a SoaS mailing list.
* We establish the SoaS development team.
Thanks,
Sebastian Dziallas
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
>> re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to do a
>> classroom for Fedora.
>
> Congratulations.
>
>> re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5 we'll use some other time
>
> Very clear - thanks
From looking at the currently available documentation for Sugar on a
Stick, I think it makes sense to collaborate on writing well written
official instructions for it. So I've entered a Blueprint in Launchpad
on it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/soas/+spec/better-docs-for-soas
I'd like to g
David Farning wrote:
> The project guidelines are now on the wiki at
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Project_Guidelines .
>
> Please edit as necessary. When it looks like the editing has
> stopped, I ask the board the ratify the guidelines.
>
> david
I just looked into this, sorry fo
Greetings,
sorry for the late notice and the cross-post. This test day will focus
on Sugar Labs' Sugar on a Stick, a downstream project based on Fedora.
Sugar on a Stick has launched it's first version codenamed "Strawberry"
successfully in June and has recently announced the beta release of it
As announced before, the SoaS QA test day [1] is coming up quickly and
will already take place tomorrow. We're still looking for people willing
to join the team, which will support the testers in #fedora-test-day.
If you'd like to jump on the train, please enter your availability here
[2] so th
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Sun, 30-08-2009 a las 21:46 +0200, Sebastian Dziallas escribió:
>> Please download and test your version of this release from here:
>>
>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/soas-2-beta.iso
>>
>> 6db05c91d2bc1a6c4af1044cea2ae0b6
https://launchpad.net/soas
Thanks,
--Sebastian Dziallas
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/
[2] http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/livecd-iso-to-disk.sh
[3] http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/appliances/soas3-20090830.zip
___
Sugar-devel ma
Hi everybody,
as noted in our roadmap for Sugar on a Stick [1], we are going to have a
joint test day with the folks from Fedora's Quality Assurance [2] to
improve the quality of SoaS on its way to version 2 (in November).
The test day is scheduled to take place on September 3, which is this
T
w00t! This arrives, by the way, perfectly in time for the beta. :)
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Caroline Meeks wrote:
> Sdz and others...
>
> We should put having a Stick work on both XOs and nonXOs on a roadmap,
> feature wish list somewhere please. I have to admit I'm getting pretty
> lost about where to put this sort of thing, especially since it crosses
> so many boundaries.
With our mo
Caroline Meeks wrote:
> Sebastian, Mel,
>
> How is it going getting broadcom support incorporated upstream? Will
> this be in the next release?
I included the b43-openfwwf package some time ago in the SoaS snapshots,
but I'm not sure on which broadcom hardware it will exactly work. So
there is
Dave Bauer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Sebastian Dziallas <mailto:sebast...@when.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> we've a new SoaS snapshot ready for testing. Here are the major changes:
>
> - We just made the switch to Rawhi
The SoaS v2 Beta Readiness Meeting is going to take place on Sunday,
August 23, 1400 UTC (making it 1000 EDT and 1600 CEST) in
#sugar-meeting. Looking forward to seeing everybody there!
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarl
Hi everybody,
with the imminent release of the SoaS v2 Beta in just ten days, I would
like to announce the switch to Launchpad as our bug tracker.
We have been evaluating an instance Luke Faraone set us up with lately
and are confident that it will fit our needs. The upcoming beta release
is t
Walter Bender wrote:
> Is there a test plan to go with the test day?
Not yet, but that's (partly) why we should meet. ;)
--Sebastian
> -walter
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Sebastian Dziallas
> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> we've a new So
Hi everybody,
we've a new SoaS snapshot ready for testing. Here are the major changes:
- We just made the switch to Rawhide (which is supposed to become F12).
So watch out for any breakages - and shout if you notice any! :)
- We now ship the shiny new zyx-liveinstaller! This is a very early
al
Just a quick heads-up to note that daily builds of our education spin
based on Rawhide are available thanks to the great work of the Infra &
Spin SIG folks.
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Those builds conclude what is supposed to become the Fedora Education
Spin for F12
So it is finally coming up: the SoaS v2 Beta. And just a few days later,
there will be the Fedora QA Test Day. I think we might have quite some
stuff to discuss (What needs to be done to get it in a proper shape? How
do we prepare for the Test Day?)...
So please go ahead and enter your availabi
send bugreports(especially for
>>>> non-tech users), so if someone interested in please pick [1] up.
>>>
>>> From what I've seen on IRC, Sebastian Dziallas is currently working on a
>>> solution, either by porting Apport to Sugar, using GNOME's
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>> A few lines up from the last boot message, it says:
>>
>> mount: unknown filesystem type 'jffs2'
>>
>> That can't be a good sign.
This is indeed not a good sign. We've had this some time ago with the
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
> Regarding getting auto-login to work after restarting X.
>
> Yesterday I looked at the slim sources and it seems at first sight easy
> to add auto login of the default user after the first login.
> Any interest in me trying to implement this?
> If we use an extra option to
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
