Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar live boot is not persistent.

Hi Umesh, Live disk[1] is ephemeral. If you need a persistent install, you might want to install it to a virtual disk. I assume you are using SoaS (Sugar on a Stick) Fedora derivative live CD. Perhaps try running `liveinst` from the Terminal.Activity or a TTY. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to get familiar with the codebase of sugar labs?

Hi Sarthak, I would suggest you to take a look at the sugar documentation (https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar), and  development environment setup (https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/development-environment.md). For documentation on the toolkit, https://developer.sugarlabs.org/suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unsubscribe

You may unsubscribe from this list (sugar-devel, here: ) or from any list over here: On Fri, Aug 20 2021 at 01:50:28 PM -0400, Ian Dudderar wrote: Hey! I was wondering if I may unsubscribe from these emails? Th

[Sugar-devel] The status of freenode (one of the communication platform used by Sugar Labs)

G'day! Amid the breaking changes happening at Freenode, it would be time to rethink Sugar Labs's primary mode of communication. It appears that rasengan (Andrew Lee) of Private Internet Access believes that ownership of the company Freenode Ltd. gives him the right to unilaterally replace th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Apply Changes to Sugar live build.

On Wednesday, April 14, 2021 2:36:19 PM +03 Shivam Rai wrote: > In terminal activity,I changed to super user with su command. Then cd/ to > respective directory. Then, vi(command) module.py. > It opened the module.Switched to insert mode(i). Changed the code. Then > saved and exit it using (:wq! )

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [ASLOv4] [RELEASE] Calculate - 47

Forwarded Message Subject:[ASLOv4] [RELEASE] Calculate - 47 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:43:54 -0500 (EST) From: activities...@sugarlabs.org Reply-To: srevins...@sugarlabs.org To: srevins...@sugarlabs.org, qu...@laptop.org Calculate-47 has been released V

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] v4.activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO-v4) is up!

On 1/27/21 8:30 AM, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 08:04:41AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: reply inline. me too. On 1/27/21 3:09 AM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:28:00AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: And now, (Thanks bernie_!), we can use https://v4

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] v4.activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO-v4) is up!

reply inline. On 1/27/21 3:09 AM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:28:00AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: And now, (Thanks bernie_!), we can use https://v4.activities.sugarlabs.org/services/update-aslo.php for supporting sugar's microformat update system as mentioned

Re: [Sugar-devel] Spectrum

-- Srevin Saju https://srevinsaju.me OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] v4.activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO-v4) is up!

in|data/org.sugarlabs.gschema.xml|to use the AsloUpdater in|src/jarabe/model/update/aslo.py|which reaches out to a PHP script|update-aslo.php|, and will instead be configured to use|src/jarabe/model/update/microformat.py|), On 1/21/21 10:03 AM, Srevin Saju wrote: Right. I will configure

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] v4.activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO-v4) is up!

s, but we don't have any active, and we don't have the same process with v4. On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:16:47AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: G'day! ASLO-v4 is finally up at https://v4.activities.sugarlabs.org! ... with only a few more minor tidying up, ASLO-v4 will be ready for product

[Sugar-devel] v4.activities.sugarlabs.org (ASLO-v4) is up!

ng to get a hold of some more good apache knowledge) * Sending "new version detected" emails to a...@lists.sugarlabs.org, or should we create a new mailing list? -- Srevin Saju https://srevinsaju.me OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signat

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2021 Ideas

aptop.org [4] https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC [5] https://quozl.linux.org.au/ [6] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org [7] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel [8] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org [9] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Srevin Saju https://srevinsaju.

Re: [Sugar-devel] WANT TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUGAR LABS FOR GSOC 2021

u are satisfied. 6. Have fun. On 1/12/21 8:08 PM, Kunal Tulsidasani wrote: Thankyou for your reply! I have read this file and this shows on what bases to check! I want to know how to check? Like what should I do? Regards Kunal On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 22:26 Srevin Saju, <mailto:srevins...@sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] WANT TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUGAR LABS FOR GSOC 2021

making any pull requests? -- Srevin Saju https://srevinsaju.me OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2021 Contribution

sugar ? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Srevin Saju https://srevinsaju.me OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: [Sugar-devel] WANT TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUGAR LABS FOR GSOC 2021

info/sugar-devel> -- James Cameron https://quozl.linux.org.au/ <https://quozl.linux.org.au/> ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Srevin S

Re: [Sugar-devel] Today's Minutes and Next Meeting Time

meetings) of course, the immediacy is ideal, and I'm sure timezone differences can be accommodated for by choosing the right time of day. So I'd say each has its place, but they are not in competition M PS I didn't know about Matrix and all the other good things the Fed

Re: [Sugar-devel] Today's Minutes and Next Meeting Time

On 12/11/20 12:18 AM, Alex Perez wrote: James Cameron wrote on 12/9/20 9:09 PM: On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 07:13:49AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: G'day! I have a topic, which perhaps needs discussion, It is about time this came up again. Pretty much :) :D We have been using IRC for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Today's Minutes and Next Meeting Time

ght_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2020-12-09> Best, Devin ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Srevin Saju Sugar Labs https://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@l

Re: [Sugar-devel] Towards ASLOv4 - Sugar Labs Activity Library v4

On November 19, 2020 11:58:04 AM GMT+03:00, James Cameron wrote: >On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:34:36AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: >> On November 19, 2020 8:38:09 AM GMT+03:00, James Cameron >> wrote: >> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:50:58PM +0300, Srevin Saju

[Sugar-devel] Towards ASLOv4 - Sugar Labs Activity Library v4

the assigned slots), its accessible here: http://18.27.196.217, https://people.sugarlabs.org/~srevinsaju/aslo Looking forward to hearing from you. Hope, everything is going well, and safe! -- Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_sign

[Sugar-devel] New members @ Oversight Board - wiki pages

https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board) Thanks, hope all are having a safe time! -- -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal to merge sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher and srevinsaju/musicblocks-app

l.com <mailto:ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:46 PM Srevin Saju <mailto:srevins...@sugarlabs.org>> wrote: Hello Hope all are having a safe time. I was wondering if we should merge srevinsaju/musicblocks-app to sugarlabs/musicblock-launcher.

[Sugar-devel] Proposal to merge sugarlabs/musicblocks-launcher and srevinsaju/musicblocks-app

if we could unify the process and maintain a single repository at `sugarlabs`'s GitHub Organization, as it would be difficult for people to discover the scattered binaries What would be your suggestion? I would be glad to fix them, or do any other changes. -- -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unable to set up the Music Blocks repository

(version v10.19.0), and python installed on my Ubuntu system, and I can run 'python' from the command line. The complete error log as defined in the last line above can be found here <https://gist.github.com/shrey27tri01/800bcc8362eb1929aa56968fbfaa606d>. Please help m

[Sugar-devel] Matrix - IRC integration complete

/#/#sugar:matrix.org <https://matrix.to/#/#sugar:matrix.org>) -- -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar

[Sugar-devel] Docker images for Sugar

I am not sure, if this has been implemented in the past! Sugar can now be run in a docker container!! And, now also as a normal application. ``` docker pull srevinsaju/sugar ``` Check it out on https://hub.docker.com/r/srevinsaju/sugar -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc

[Sugar-devel] Initial Release SugarLabs Appstore Generator

generator, you could simply pip install sugarstore-generator and execute it by saasbuild  --help Special thanks to all those who contributed and gave suggestions on how to improve the appstore! It was a great experience working on ASLO v4. -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mode of distribution of Sugar Activities

, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:50:45AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: Remember that in my design for aslov4, it must "support activity bundles uploaded via ssh," I have seen and read the GSoC guidelines. I have also noticed that aslov4 should support activities u

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mode of distribution of Sugar Activities

ue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:22:41AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: Thanks Yes, there is no single source of Python 3 activity bundles. There was for Python 2 activities; it was activities.sugarlabs.org. I hope aslov4 would solve this issue. I have now uploaded entire successfully built Python3 bund

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mode of distribution of Sugar Activities

ill try to complete the best I can, to my knowledge. -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

[Sugar-devel] Updates: Python3 app store (aslov4) : Sugar App Store

Hello, /(PS: If you received the email earlier, please ignore this. For some reason, my previous email was marked as spam, so most of them might not have actually received it. This is an updated email of the previously sent 'Updates: Python3 app store (aslov4) : Sugar App Store'; I hope this

Re: [Sugar-devel] What happened to Pointillism Activity?

pushed my latest master branch to it. You also have a fork, please check if there is anything missing. I'll now remove users from sugarlabs org who haven't contributed recently. On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:11:21AM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: I have been looking for the Pointillism Activity;

[Sugar-devel] What happened to Pointillism Activity?

sed, I can't find it :'( -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab

Re: [Sugar-devel] Updates: Python3 app store (aslov4) : Sugar App Store

2020, 9:24:53 PM GMT+5:30, Srevin Saju wrote: Hello, Hope all are having a safe week amid nCoV. I and Manish (su...@radii.dev <mailto:su...@radii.dev>) had been working on the GSoC project which did not get a slot (Python3 app store aslov4), and I guess we have made good progress in

[Sugar-devel] Updates: Python3 app store (aslov4) : Sugar App Store

Hello, Hope all are having a safe week amid nCoV. I and Manish (su...@radii.dev) had been working on the GSoC project which did not get a slot (Python3 app store aslov4), and I guess we have made good progress in it. /We decided to collaborate on the project because a frontend and backend dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] Query regarding development setup for sugar activiities

will be reflected in sugar ? Thanks ! On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 11:03 PM Srevin Saju <mailto:srevins...@sugarlabs.org>> wrote: Hello Tushar, Great to hear you have setup the development environment To port stick-hero-activity, you may follow these steps if you are not u

Re: [Sugar-devel] Query regarding development setup for sugar activiities

iki.sugarlabs.org/go/Internet_Relay_Chat) . we will try to help you out, -- V/r Srevin Saju OpenPGP_0x1007816766D390D7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Debian Advocacy for Sugar - Update - 02-June-2020

nd use a markdown parser or (github pages / hugo) for V/r Srevin Saju ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Mode of distribution of Sugar Activities

b and .rpms, or are (*.xo) bundles' still used for public activity distribution (other than OLPC OS?); This also leads to another question, i.e if most activities are packaged in .xo's or only (.deb, .rpm, flatpak) Thanks V/r Srevin Saju ___ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release git packages for Sugar

Yes, I will try to test more. I have locally created the fix for the new issue on Sugar repository #909, but I would need to test it out before creating the PR. Maybe we could add more task to the GSoC to improve the sugar repository. We have 12 unfinished Pull Requests (excluding 1 (mine) and 2 (H

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release git packages for Sugar

what works. > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:41:13PM +0300, Srevin Saju wrote: > > Released to the Arch User Repository > > * gwebsockets-git (0.7+git) > > * sugar-artwork-git (0.116+git) > > * sugar-datastore-git (0.116+git) > > * sugar-git (0.116+git) >

[Sugar-devel] Release git packages for Sugar

Released to the Arch User Repository * gwebsockets-git (0.7+git) * sugar-artwork-git (0.116+git) * sugar-datastore-git (0.116+git) * sugar-git (0.116+git) * sugar-runner-git (0.110+git) * sugar-toolkit2-gtk3-git (0.116+git) * sugar-toolkit-gtk3-git (0.116+git)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Contributing through GSOC

Hey Shaan, I guess that error was fixed by me on sugar github repo. Try rebuilding the sugar package from the source. If its not still fixed, let me know. This tool might be useful gnome-shell-extension I guess there is already a apt package for it. sudo apt install gnome-shell-extension This too

Re: [Sugar-devel] Contributing through GSoC

> Shaan > > > On Saturday, March 7, 2020, 1:20:13 PM GMT+5:30, Srevin Saju < > srevi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Shaan. You have brought interest to know you have been using > Manjaro (Arch) based Linux. I would be happy to have Arch Linux based > packag

Re: [Sugar-devel] Contributing through GSoC

Thanks Shaan. You have brought interest to know you have been using Manjaro (Arch) based Linux. I would be happy to have Arch Linux based packages tested and then published it to the community repository for pacman. You may be interested in installing Sugar Desktop natively on Manjaro by https://gi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Music Blocks v3.0 is released.

To my opinion a WebKit2 would do the trick as had been done in Jupyter Activity. All the UI interaction elements have already been defined in musiclblocks itself. The last things to do would be * a serve * check musicblocks serve completed successfully, take the port of connection. There is a possi

[Sugar-devel] Mascot for sugar

-profit collective education systems. The other is, we are getting a mascot personalized to sugar. Most open source companies have mascots too. So its a subject to be brought to discussion, if anyone is interested V/r *SREVIN SAJU* *https://srevinsaju.github.io <https://srevinsaju.github

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal to move communication to other platform

I agree to Prashant. To me Slack seems to be a viable option, and indeed popular too. But unfortunately due to historical reasons, we might not move to another platform. Nevertheless, it might be of interest to other developers in the community I am sure this request must have been raised earlier

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem in setting the environment

null' has been blocked by CORS policy: Cross origin requests are only > supported for protocol schemes: http, data, chrome, chrome-extension, https. > webL10n.js:67 [l10n] > file:///C:/Users/aayus/Downloads/sugarizer-dev/locale.ini not found. > consoleWarn @ webL10n.js:67 > loca

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem in setting the environment

Hello Aayush May I know what errors you have encountered while setting up the sugar desktop or the reason which you feel that sugar is not starting. Try to include logs so that adequate help can be provided ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar for Ubuntu 20.04

I would love to join packaging, I have never tried packaging Debian packages, so it would be a great time to learn, I would be joining you on 20th February (my exams getting over that time), and I have been testing focal fossa, so it should be easy to carry on. thanks __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar AI

sugar AI API is sugaroid. looking for more suggestions :) On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, 20:43 Walter Bender, wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:02 PM Srevin Saju wrote: > >> I am currently working on an Artificial Intelligence for Sugar (20% >> complete), and I looking forwar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 136, Issue 18

Out of the given options, Option 2 looks professional :) On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 8:02 PM wrote: > Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to > sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/s

[Sugar-devel] Sugar AI

I am currently working on an Artificial Intelligence for Sugar (20% complete), and I looking forward for suggestions of how good the idea might be, or if its not necessary. The aim of the bot is to: * An entirely new user to sugar might have to read the documentation to understand how to use a Sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

bus = cls._new_for_bus(address_or_type, mainloop=mainloop) > > dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoServer: Failed to > connect to socket /tmp/dbus-sXjvXfatyb: Conexión rehusada > > > > The spanish "Conexión rehusada" means "Connection ref

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

e from the Arch repository. > > :-) > > Hadn't seen Sugar in a long time. No comments. > > Regards, > Sebastian > > El jue, 06-02-2020 a las 20:44 +0300, Srevin Saju escribió: > > I have added python2-sugar support for helping out python2 based > > sugar a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

package). >> >> Regards, >> Sebastian >> >> >> El jue, 06-02-2020 a las 19:47 +0300, Srevin Saju escribió: >> > Great, thanks for the update. In this package, I have dropped support >> > for Python2 activities, (I have forgotten to mention tha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

ency and it seems not to be needed for running Sugar > or activities? > > Also the .INSTALL problem with your package seems to be unrelated to > the issue you posted (but explains why you made the package). > > Regards, > Sebastian > > > El jue, 06-02-2020 a las 19:47 +03

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

stance > ImportError: No module named sugar3.activity > > Getting closer... > Regards, > Sebastian > > El jue, 06-02-2020 a las 19:16 +0300, Srevin Saju escribió: > > Thanks for testing, Sebastian. This is because, the python-empy > > package on Fedora Distribution an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

> /tmp/alpm_oAGVZn/.INSTALL: line 21: `}' > > :: Running post-transaction hooks... > > (1/1) Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate... > > > Looking forward to test again. > Regards, > > Sebastian > > El jue, 06-02-2020 a las 16:24 +0300, Srevin Saju escribió: >

[Sugar-devel] Initial Release: Sugar packages 0.116 for Arch Linux

An Initial release for * Sugar 0.116 * Sugar Artwork 0.116 * Sugar Datastore 0.116 * Sugar Toolkit GTK3 0.116 * Sugar runner 0.110 (master) * gwebsockets 0.7 has been published as prerelease to https://github.com/srevinsaju/sugar-arch/releases/tag/0.116. Some developer filed a deletion request on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Advocacy for Arch Linux

ribute as they choose, but asking us to focus efforts > to $favoritePreferredDistro doesn't necessarily serve to benefit the > community as a whole. > > Regards, > Alex Perez > > Srevin Saju > February 4, 2020 at 8:17 AM > I have noticed the GSoC projects for Ubun

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Advocacy for Arch Linux

I have noticed the GSoC projects for Ubuntu and Fedora, however, it would be nice to have Sugar tested on Arch Linux also, as part of GSoC. Currently we have only 1 tester for Arch, viz, Markimus, on the AUR. Testing on Arch Linux or Mankato, would help to also include Manjaro with Sugar DE distrib

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ideal futures for the "I Know" Sugar activities Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 135, Issue 38

will it make a good GSoC task? I like the idea of uniform IKnow** activity. Possibly, a good suggestion would be to have a single IKnowCountry activity, with countries as submodules. installing the data files for each country should show up in the IKnowCountry home page with buttons on installed I

[Sugar-devel] Update Help-Activity

The Help-Activity on sugarlabs/help-activity is 55 commits behind and 53-commits behind godiard/help-activity. Python3-port was not merged to sugarlabs master. V/r *SREVIN SAJU* *https://srevinsaju.github.io <https://srevinsaju.github.io>* *Verified - GPG signed* -BEGIN PGP PUBL

[Sugar-devel] ARCH PACKAGES FOR SUGAR

-artwork-arch sugar-runner: corresponds to older version, no changes == 0.110* Please note, all these PKGBUILDS are in alpha state. Its integrity can be only made by testing the PKGBUILDS on archlinux. All testers welcome. V/r *SREVIN SAJU* *https://srevinsaju.github.io <ht

[Sugar-devel] NOTICE: New page added to sugarwiki

Please review https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Installation, a new page added which provides a user friendly approach to sugar installation. Sources have been updated from github sugar-docs ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://