[Sugar-devel] Yama First impressions, OLPC OS 13.1 31018

2012-12-14 Thread Yama Ploskonka
IMHO networking security might gain from having an option to permanently hide the password. I believe Linux is years ahead of Windows in this, as we can choose to make the password visible or not, but it would add security if passwords also could be hidden permanently, as a third choice, espe

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
st it soon Thank you again! On 11/30/2012 01:27 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Yama Ploskonka wrote: 2) What is the role of these 31012 builds? are they meant as an official update? are they undergoing further testing? In short, should I point people to those instead

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
11/30/2012 12:47 PM, Yama Ploskonka wrote: Thank you again! maybe I got this wrong. what happens is that I do not understand the nature of the os## folder names, and, bottom line, how can I help most to get the repositories right this time for the msp430 toolchain. I can test with XO-1 with dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
i, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Yama Ploskonka wrote: questions: 1) Are there Release 13 files for testing on XO-1 I can try? I apologize if I was not clear. The 13.1 series is still under development. It is not a stable release and will only load on machines that have developer keys. There are

[Sugar-devel] 13.1 ? and 12 ? Re: [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2012-11-30

2012-11-30 Thread Yama Ploskonka
questions: 1) Are there Release 13 files for testing on XO-1 I can try? As is of record, I am most concerned on how the msp430 toolkit will build. Significant issues with os 12 repositories... http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/OLPC_XO-1 2) What is the role of these 31012 builds? are they me

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Localization] Help activity

2009-06-03 Thread Yama Ploskonka
Seth Woodworth wrote: > The point of having the Help > activity as its own icon was to put it as close and easy to the user as > possible. There was a goal of having the help activity or similar > introduction run on first boot, but we ran out of time in the 8.2 release. Thank you for bri