>Looks better, but still, no Harry Potter...
>
If you want to go down that road, may I suggest to look for J. K. Rowling
instead?...
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Google (or any other company). But is a matter of policies and priorities
really.
On software politics I agree with you. The question is, does the 7 year run of
OLPC/Sugar indicate that are also effective in the olpc goals?
>
>On Sunday, 10 November 2013, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
&g
ooops
>> What do you mean with utilizing sugar shell etc? It seems like that's
> either porting the GNOME platform to make the current implementation work, or
> rewriting them using the Android SDK.
>>
>
> Probably another technically inaccurate term. I mean
re-writing
>but keeping the
k a company could hire people
and do it, it's not rocket science.
>
>
>On Sunday, 10 November 2013, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
>>
>>> Does anyone else want to add their thoughts on:
>>>
>>
>>These are all good for now but without the "saf
>
> Does anyone else want to add their thoughts on:
>
These are all good for now but without the "safety" of the 2-3 million default
users, SL can not just be the "upstream". There are some more fundamental
questions now that we need to compete in the "open market".
In a nutshell, whom do we
>> The larger problem is the absence of a marketing strategy, we need to know
>> where we are going to communicate effectively. In particular, we need to
>> choose and implement how to offer Sugar tryout to teachers and journalists.
>>
>
> I can think of a couple of approaches
>
> * Get Sugar
For sugar developers their is certainly a continuation in development and the
current numbering makes a lot of sense.
However, looking from outside 0.102 should be Sugar 3.x where 1.x is the
original, 2.x is the Gtk3/introspection move and now the html5/jc
(online/ultrabook/tablet) version.
>> The big idea is that open sources projects thrive when they create
>> conditions and cultures where people with overlapping yet
>> non-identical goals can come together collaborate around a common
>> goal.
>> Sugar Labs has found itself in a position where there is a high
>> degree of conformi
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 08:57:14 +0100
> From: Christophe Gu?ret
> To: James Cameron
> Cc: sugar-devel
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with testing SemanticXO's
> backend
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Oups! I forgot I had installed that pa
> From: James Cameron
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] multi-selection in journal
> [Sugar-devel
> Digest, Vol 31, Issue 103]
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:51:33AM -0700, Yioryos
> Asprobounitis wrote:
> > It can be usefu
> From: Martin Abente
>
> Hello Amigos,
>
> Lately I have been working on the support for
> multi-selection in the
> journal. This feature was originally part of Dextrose3's
> TODO [1], but
> during EduJAM [2], many people were interested in having it
> on Sugar
> mainstream, so I will give it
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:58:38 +1000
> From: James Cameron
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Sunrise and ByJove
> Message-ID: <20110523065838.ga31...@us.netrek.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> We had listed on the old OLPC Wiki Ac
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 17:47:23 +1000
> From: James Cameron
> To: David Farning
> Cc: 'IAEP' ,
> 'Sugar Devel'
>
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] EduJAM day 2 Tour of Uruguay
> Message-ID: <20110503074723.gf3...@us.netrek.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> O
--- On Thu, 4/28/11, Walter Bender wrote:
> From: Walter Bender
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] GPL non compliance? [Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 30,
> Issue 66]
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, 6:57 AM
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Walter Bender wrote:
> From: Walter Bender
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] GPL non compliance? [Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 30,
> Issue 66]
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 10:4
--- On Tue, 4/26/11, sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org 3. Re: [SLOBS] GPL non compliance?
First let me apologizes for my previous “loaded” post. Well... it was loaded.
Hopefully this one is not.
So I was wondering to what extend GPLvX applies to Sugar’s target users.
The *educationa
I do not really know much about licensing, but I really get upset
occasionally...
So be advised that flammable material may be included even if this is not my
intention.
I have the sense that once more Sugar is becoming FSF’s guinea-pig that only
spells troubles (see users looking for codecs,
> 12. Yioryos Asprobounitis announced a new version of Sugar
> running in
> Puppy Linux.
> See the full announcement here:
> [http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/XOpup/Announce_XOpup-2.html]
>
I wish, but we are not there yet
> include/linux/types.h:4:23: error: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
You can not compile drivers against the F11 XO-1 kernels because is missing asm
headers.
You must patch kernel-xo-1.spec the and rebuild the kernel.
This is #10297
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10297
___
> --
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:14:14 -0500
> From: chm
> To: Wade Brainerd
> Cc: Sugar Devel
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Wacom Bamboo with Colors! on
> XO-1 (again)?
> Message-ID: <4d0ff156.10...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=window
I did read with great interest both D. Farning's the "stepping down" and
"Moving forward" as well as the public "freeze" that followed the first one.
I'm not really in the field of ITC but I do know a bit about projects,
particularly collaborative ones. Every development project to have a hope
--- On Thu, 10/14/10, sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
wrote:
> From: sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> Subject: Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 69
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 5:20 AM
> Send Sugar-devel mailing list
> submissions
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, James Cameron wrote:
> From: James Cameron
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 36 9Re: how to
> ask a question)
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: "Sebastian Silva" , "David Farning"
> ,
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, David Farning wrote:
> From: David Farning
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 36 9Re: how to
> ask a question)
> To: "Sebastian Silva"
> Cc: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" ,
> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org,
--- On Sat, 10/9/10, Walter Bender wrote:
> From: Walter Bender
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 36 9Re: how to
> ask a question)
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Date: Saturday, October 9, 2
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:32:42 +1100
> From: James Cameron
> To: Bernie Innocenti
> Cc: IAEP ,
> sugar-devel
> ,
> David Farning ,
> c...@laptop.org,
> Ishan Bansal
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] how to ask a question
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-asci
--- On Tue, 8/31/10, sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
wrote:
> 3. Community (was: Re: Bug tracking
> Vs Patch review) (Sascha Silbe)
> 5. Re: Community (was: Re: Bug tracking
> Vs Patch review)
> (Tomeu Vizoso)
I'm not a sugarlabs member but I read the list and a felt I sh
27 matches
Mail list logo
