People in Paraguay complained for the removal of the Restart function
from Sugar 0.88:
http://trac.paraguayeduca.org/ticket/672
I suspect it's just natural user resistance to any UI change, so I asked
for rationale.
The change was requested by dsd, also without any good rationale to
justify it:
bernie wrote:
> People in Paraguay complained for the removal of the Restart function
> from Sugar 0.88:
>
> http://trac.paraguayeduca.org/ticket/672
>
> I suspect it's just natural user resistance to any UI change, so I asked
> for rationale.
>
> The change was requested by dsd, also
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> People in Paraguay complained for the removal of the Restart function
> from Sugar 0.88:
>
> http://trac.paraguayeduca.org/ticket/672
>
> {...}
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1206
>
>
> I'm posting this for public discussion of thi
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 09:37 -0400, Frederick Grose escribió:
> Anything else we would like feedback on?
>
>
> Please also consider http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/503.
I don't know... if we drop the Restart button in the menu, do we still
need to take any action? Also, where's the p
On 16 July 2010 06:25, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> People in Paraguay complained for the removal of the Restart function
> from Sugar 0.88:
>
> http://trac.paraguayeduca.org/ticket/672
>
> I suspect it's just natural user resistance to any UI change, so I asked
> for rationale.
>
> The change was r
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 15:33 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
> There was a discussion on sugar-devel before that ticket was opened,
> the changes had support from various deployments and other people.
Which deployments requested it?
> Reboot can still be trivially achieved with power down and p
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:50:09PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> I asked in the ticket and on irc. The whole truth appears to be: "some
> users bitched about it, better not argue with them".
That's local customisation then. We should make design decisions based
on use case and need, not on his
On 16 July 2010 16:50, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 15:33 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
>
>> There was a discussion on sugar-devel before that ticket was opened,
>> the changes had support from various deployments and other people.
>
> Which deployments requested it?
The ide
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 18:30 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
> On 16 July 2010 16:50, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 15:33 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
> >
> >> There was a discussion on sugar-devel before that ticket was opened,
> >> the changes had support from various dep
El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 08:40 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
> i'm was far more surprised by moving shutdown to the top of that
> menu (i use the control panel a lot more than shutdown) than i was
> by the removal of restart.
Yes, I don't like this change either... but I'll ask the users what they
th
bernie wrote:
> El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 08:40 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
> > if so, it's the
> > first large-scale usage of the new suspend-or-shutdown menu, so i'm
> > interested in reaction to that. for instance -- is shutdown really
> > the most often used menu item, now that the machine
El Sat, 17-07-2010 a las 20:00 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
> dimming after 15 seconds? perhaps. or maybe we should simply make
> the time-to-suspend quite a bit longer on XO-1. (a minute? two?)
I'm not a fan of adding obscure configuration knobs for everything, but
this seems one of those cases
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 00:50, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 15:33 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
>
>> There was a discussion on sugar-devel before that ticket was opened,
>> the changes had support from various deployments and other people.
>
> Which deployments requested it?
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 02:30, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 16 July 2010 16:50, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> El Fri, 16-07-2010 a las 15:33 -0600, Daniel Drake escribió:
>>
>>> There was a discussion on sugar-devel before that ticket was opened,
>>> the changes had support from various deployments and
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 01:42, James Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:50:09PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> I asked in the ticket and on irc. The whole truth appears to be: "some
>> users bitched about it, better not argue with them".
>
> That's local customisation then. We should
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 14:32 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > I've no objection to changing it back, just so that we look responsive.
> > We could swap it back and forth once every year or so. A regular party.
>
> I would consider raising the bar a bit more when removing a change is
> requested by r
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:50:49AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Perhaps we could make the button configurable with a gconf key, like we
> already do for Logoff?
I agree.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar
G'day,
Sometimes the logout, restart or shutdown option in the buddy menu
does not work. Restarts from the control panel are also affected.
No message is shown. The user must notice the problem and use the
power button instead.
An underlying cause is an activity or application that does not
re
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:56:07PM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> The design choices are;
>
> - add a timeout of about 15 seconds, log, and then ignore the problem
> and continue, [...]
>
> - ask the user to solve the problem, with an alert, [...]
>
> - combination of both above, make the tim
19 matches
Mail list logo
