Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 15:45, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> wrote:
>> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> But if someone has good ideas about how to expose contacts from
>>> mutiple accounts, here is the thread.
>> I think there are lots of interesting ways to do that. For example,
>> Bitfrost
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 15:45, Benjamin M. Schwartz
wrote:
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> But if someone has good ideas about how to expose contacts from
>> mutiple accounts, here is the thread.
>
> I think there are lots of interesting ways to do that. For example,
> Bitfrost specifies that each user i
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> But if someone has good ideas about how to expose contacts from
> mutiple accounts, here is the thread.
I think there are lots of interesting ways to do that. For example,
Bitfrost specifies that each user is identified by a cryptographic public
key. To certify that an acco
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:44, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
> >> Sugar should become
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 19:43, Benjamin M. Schwartz
wrote:
> Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
>> Sugar should become able to deal with more than one IM account active
>> concurrently.
>
> I think this is a good goal, but it creates some in
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 19:39, David Van Assche wrote:
> Problem 2 doesn't seem to be a problem of telepathy, as it can handle
> concurrent connections just fine. It would be nice if Sugar could do the
> same. This would mean problem 1 stops being important. If there is some
> limitation within sug
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:44, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
>> Sugar should become able to deal with more than one IM account active
>> concurrently. Up to n
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
> Sugar should become able to deal with more than one IM account active
> concurrently. Up to now, Sugar's Presence Service will enable the
> Avahi-based one, th
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
> Sugar should become able to deal with more than one IM account active
> concurrently.
I think this is a good goal, but it creates some incredibly tricky
UI/interaction problems. I think an important fir
Problem 2 doesn't seem to be a problem of telepathy, as it can handle
concurrent connections just fine. It would be nice if Sugar could do the
same. This would mean problem 1 stops being important. If there is some
limitation within sugar that forces it to use just one connection, a
dialogue asking
Hi all,
as part of the effort to make Sugar a more "normal" Telepathy client,
Sugar should become able to deal with more than one IM account active
concurrently. Up to now, Sugar's Presence Service will enable the
Avahi-based one, then disable it if a connection to a Jabber server
was successful.
11 matches
Mail list logo
