On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
>> Otherwise it is possible to include, eg, system modules before local ones.
>
> Which is how Python 2 usually works. Your patch would make us deviate
> from upstream, making it harder to debug.
I've done extensive programming with Python, Perl
Excerpts from Aleksey Lim's message of Sun Feb 06 01:50:54 +0100 2011:
[Posting only on sugar-devel - please let's discuss general Sugar
development just there, not on dextrose]
> Otherwise it is possible to include, eg, system modules before local ones.
Which is how Python 2 usually works. Your
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:13:24AM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 09:39 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > In my mind, the situation when modules that come with activity have
> > higher priority than system ones is more natural/predictable.
>
> I attempted to do the reverse with Watch
On 02/06/2011 09:39 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> In my mind, the situation when modules that come with activity have
> higher priority than system ones is more natural/predictable.
I attempted to do the reverse with Watch Me. Watch Me includes binary
python modules that are not installed by default i
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 07:22:12PM -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>>
>> Not that would cause much of a slowdown, or that this would handle the
>> (hopefully unlikely) case where Python gains modules named identically
>> to Activity ones, but:
>>
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 07:22:12PM -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> Not that would cause much of a slowdown, or that this would handle the
> (hopefully unlikely) case where Python gains modules named identically
> to Activity ones, but:
>
> What are we trying to solve here? Are activities bu
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:22 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> What are we trying to solve here? Are activities bundling third-party
> Python libraries which have to be preferred in most cases over
> system-provided ones (if present)?
So, my expectations is that if an activity developer chooses
Not that would cause much of a slowdown, or that this would handle the
(hopefully unlikely) case where Python gains modules named identically
to Activity ones, but:
What are we trying to solve here? Are activities bundling third-party
Python libraries which have to be preferred in most case
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 00:50 +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Otherwise it is possible to include, eg, system modules before local ones.
Seems like a good idea.
Reviewed-by: Bernie Innocenti
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
9 matches
Mail list logo
