On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set.
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:37:09AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 03:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set.
IMHO, instead of proposing (apparently out of the blue) new features
that
(oops, wrong subject)
Hi all,
This post is not about particular feature but about proposed
to 0.88 features that can be composited to one set. Some of them
could be implemented in 0.88 partially, some are invasive, some not.
We lost possibility to push several such features in 0.86 and we have
..to continue summarising..
In fact, all proposed features are not about increasing complexity
but about decreasing for floor level - user all time works with sugar
objects(activities, activity objects, foreign object etc) but from
different views. And let developers/deployments/teachers
5 matches
Mail list logo
