On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote:
>
>> By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is
>> a very big deal for us.
>
> We use a local variant of the F11-XO1 images by Stephen Parrish, signed
> wi
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote:
> >
> >> By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is
> >> a very big deal for us.
> >
> > We u
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
> quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management.
Are all activities working, including collaboration? In Gnome, can you
actually use FF? Came
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
> > quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management.
>
> Are all activities worki
Forgot to answer a paragraph:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
> > quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management
On 13 Mar 2010, at 18:12, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti
>> wrote:
>>> If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
>>> quality than build 801, provided you disable
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 20:50 +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Agreed, though this argument only really works if the changes
> each time are easy to install from the user perspective with
> no loss of data. I wish we were doing much better here.
Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use
On 3/14/2010 9:49 AM, Chris Marshall wrote:
> On 3/14/2010 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 20:50 +, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>
>>> It feels uncomfortable that Sugar 0.84 is already a year old effort
>>> as of this week, from its official release, too far ahead of
>>> depl
You might find Sugar on a Stick in Virtualbox OSE to be a better
development environment than an XO. I VirtualBox to test Sugar under
different Linux distributions, and to keep multiple versions around.
Install the Guest Additions, which let you mount a real drive that you
can use for file transfer
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use a simple shell
> script to backup and restore the journal (and scratch data) across
So no XS in place?
>> It feels uncomfortable that Sugar 0.84 is already a year old effort
>> as
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use a simple shell
> > script to backup and restore the journal (and scratch data) across
>
> So no XS in place?
The repai
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> So no XS in place?
>
> The repair lab is not nearby any of the schools.
Ah - ok. Thanks for clarifying.
>> Downstreams that go to deployment (OLPC!) want to wait until a release
>> is reasonably well tested and stabilised.
>
> We have a
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
> Yes -- but we gotta remember that it's productive (specially for
> Sugar) because you are ther
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
>> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
> [...]
>> Yes -- but we gotta remember tha
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>>> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
>>> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone lik
15 matches
Mail list logo
