On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
Yes -- but we gotta remember that it's productive (specially for
Sugar) because you are there.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
Yes -- but we gotta
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Me too, but it's not as bad as it seems: the techies use a simple shell
script to backup and restore the journal (and scratch data) across
So no XS in
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
So no XS in place?
The repair lab is not nearby any of the schools.
Ah - ok. Thanks for clarifying.
Downstreams that go to deployment (OLPC!) want to wait until a release
is reasonably well tested and stabilised.
On 3/14/2010 9:49 AM, Chris Marshall wrote:
On 3/14/2010 1:17 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 20:50 +, Gary C Martin wrote:
It feels uncomfortable that Sugar 0.84 is already a year old effort
as of this week, from its official release, too far ahead of
deployments?
It
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote:
By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is
a very big deal for us.
We use a local variant of the F11-XO1 images by Stephen Parrish,
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 10:46 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 08:33 -0500, Gerald Ardito wrote:
By the way, how do you upgrade the XOs (we have XO-1s) to .84? This is
a very big deal for us.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management.
Are all activities working, including collaboration? In Gnome, can you
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic power management.
Are all
Forgot to answer a paragraph:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
quality than build 801, provided you disable automatic
On 13 Mar 2010, at 18:12, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 12:07 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
If you ask me: our recent F11-XO1 builds have reached equal or better
quality than build 801, provided you
12 matches
Mail list logo
