On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Christoph
Derndorfer wrote:
> Sean DALY schrieb:
>> IMHO, close study of small deployments makes them incredibly useful to
>> all teachers and Learners. The observations and take-aways need to be
>> triaged of course, starting with what can/should be done by Sugar
>
H... I have to agree with Christoph here. I didn't really see it as
being dramatic at all, but quite factual in fact. The western small
deployments really don't give us any useful stats on what is happening on a
larger scale in the third world. And its important to acknowledge the
differences b
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 15:51, David Van Assche wrote:
> H... I have to agree with Christoph here. I didn't really see it as
> being dramatic at all, but quite factual in fact. The western small
> deployments really don't give us any useful stats on what is happening on a
> larger scale in the
I think you are misunderstanding what I am saying... all I said was "we need
more data from the field"
I am in no way blaming anyone for not getting feedback, on the contrary, I
am frustrated that the calls for feediback are not being heard enoguh, and I
am well aware of people's efforts to try an
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Van Assche wrote:
[snip]
> Or are you saying the feedback is getting through and I'm just not seeing
> it?
We all seem to agree that feedback is important.
We mostly agree that there is value in feedback from all deployments,
big and small.
We are currently
>From my end, I can offer extensive feedback on Sugar usage in Andalucian
schools, when we ship our next release in September. As this is a pretty
controlled environment, we should be able to get some automated statistics.
I'd love to hear some ideas on this. What could we install on the client
sug
David,
Thank you, that is exactly the direction that we need to head!
david
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM, David Van Assche wrote:
> From my end, I can offer extensive feedback on Sugar usage in Andalucian
> schools, when we ship our next release in September. As this is a pretty
> controlled
Also please share your ideas on have to better this feedback on the
deployment team, meetings and wiki-pages.
as a side note. we need also more feedback from XO deployments with
Sugar, are OLPC and Countries willing to help ?.
or just passing all the responsibility to SugarLabs?.
I know that man
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 20:17, David Van Assche wrote:
> I think you are misunderstanding what I am saying... all I said was "we need
> more data from the field"
Well, I also understood that you said that it wasn't obvious enough.
Which surprised me after all the noise lately about getting feedbac
Ok, I think what's happening here is a breakdown in communication. When I
used the term obvious, I was talking about Christoph's email... I was
stating that perhaps the message, as I understood it, was that we need more
data from the field... and that _the message_ was not obvious enough in the
ema
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 17:12, David Van Assche wrote:
> Ok, I think what's happening here is a breakdown in communication. When I
> used the term obvious, I was talking about Christoph's email... I was
> stating that perhaps the message, as I understood it, was that we need more
> data from the fi
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 15:06 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:17 PM, David Van Assche wrote:
> [snip]
> > Or are you saying the feedback is getting through and I'm just not seeing
> > it?
>
> We all seem to agree that feedback is important.
>
> We mostly agree that there is
12 matches
Mail list logo
