On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 18:45 -0600, Felipe López Toledo wrote:
>
> That works for me. How about Sunday before 11 am EST?
> 11 am EST = 11 am UTC-5 = 10 am México
> ok :)
great! see u then
>
--
Bryan W. Berry
Senior Engineer
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
___
2009/11/6 Bryan Berry
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 22:43 +0100, Felipe López Toledo wrote:
> >
> > interesting, +1 to use test-driven
> > I think it will consume more time, but it will make easier the
> > introduction to new developers
>
> I haven't made that much progress yet but u can see the start
hi!
2009/11/4 Bryan Berry
> I am refactoring jquery.karma.js using test-driven development.
>
> I think you did a great job in writing it in the first place, but I am
> far to lazy to manually test out the entire library every time I make a
> change.
>
interesting, +1 to use test-driven
I think
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 08:36 +, Lucian Branescu wrote:
> There's one point I want to nitpick on, you can make karma usable with
> any library even if it uses jquery internally. Jquery is especially
> well suited for this since it the least invasive (it even injects just
> one object).
That's a
There's one point I want to nitpick on, you can make karma usable with any
library even if it uses jquery internally. Jquery is especially well suited
for this since it the least invasive (it even injects just one object).
On 4 Nov 2009 05:04, "Bryan Berry" wrote:
I am refactoring jquery.karma.j
I am refactoring jquery.karma.js using test-driven development.
I think you did a great job in writing it in the first place, but I am
far to lazy to manually test out the entire library every time I make a
change.
Reading through jquery.karma.js, I have some questions:
--- the init function ---
6 matches
Mail list logo
