[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-26 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
Because of missing initialization and a weak test for the existence of the object (self._update_signal_match is not None) Turtle Art was crashing when resuming from the Journal. Signed-off-by: Raúl Gutiérrez S. Ackd-by: Bernie Innocenti --- src/sugar/datastore/datastore.py |1 + 1 files ch

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-26 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
Forgot to mention that this is for 0.84 branch, 0.88 does it right. On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 15:50 -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: > Because of missing initialization and a weak test for the existence of > the object (self._update_signal_match is not None) Turtle Art was > crashing when resumi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-26 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:50:17PM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: > Because of missing initialization and a weak test for the existence of > the object (self._update_signal_match is not None) Turtle Art was > crashing when resuming from the Journal. Reviewed, but I didn't understand. This

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-27 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
James, On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:25 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:50:17PM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: > > Because of missing initialization and a weak test for the existence of > > the object (self._update_signal_match is not None) Turtle Art was > > crashing wh

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-27 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:43:21AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: > Looking at it with more detail, the problem is that > self._update_signal_match is initialized in the wrong order (after a > call to set_object_id that depends on it). No worries, now I understand, and approve. Reviewed-by

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 09:56 +1000, James Cameron wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:43:21AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: > > Looking at it with more detail, the problem is that > > self._update_signal_match is initialized in the wrong order (after a > > call to set_object_id that depends o

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:57:24AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Great, what is the next step for inclusion? (I have no commit access to sugar-toolkit). Please provide the updated patch (i.e. including Reviewed-By/Tested-By/... lines) as a separate MIME part (I don't care whether it's m

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 28-04-2010 a las 19:33 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió: > Please provide the updated patch (i.e. including > Reviewed-By/Tested-By/... lines) as a separate MIME part (I don't care > whether it's marked inline or attachment, but it needs to be a separate > MIME part so it doesn't get munged

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:32:25AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > Hmm... sugar-toolkit is missing a MAINTAINERS file. +1 > It would be good to add it, or document the current maintainer > mappings somewhere (gitorious, wiki...) Only put it somewhere else if you don't want people to find it whe