>
> Anything else is just hacks on top of hacks.
I disagree. Personally, I think auto-hiding the frame after a delay is a
clean solution that's desirable anyway. But I do agree that the decision of
whether to hide the frame or not should not be based on stopped clocks.
Jameson
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Dengler wrote:
> Anybody have any great ideas about how to solve the problem of what to
> do just before power management dims/blanks the screen, and how we
> would want to be notified of that?
IMHO, effort is best spent moving the suspend supp
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 05:36:12PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:49:05AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> > I think Sugar should only officially support a clock in the devices
> > tray.
>
> What FRAME_RELATIVE_POSITION would you like it in?
>
> > [clock should be HH:MM with
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 12:17:05AM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:01:14AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> > given martin's point about the battery level, wireless strength,
> > etc, all becoming stale as well, perhaps the best fix would be to
> > always hide the frame dur
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 09:01:14AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> sascha wrote:
> > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
> >
> > [Clock behaviour in suspend]
> > > But I take your point...the answer is: no, it's not easy (with my
> > > simple patch). I'm not sure
jameson wrote:
> Well, if the frame always auto-hid after 10 seconds, and the delay for
> idle-suspend was 15 seconds, then it would work. I personally believe that
> the frame should be hidden more agressively - whenever there's a user action
> that doesn't address it, and after a longish time
Well, if the frame always auto-hid after 10 seconds, and the delay for
idle-suspend was 15 seconds, then it would work. I personally believe that
the frame should be hidden more agressively - whenever there's a user action
that doesn't address it, and after a longish timeout around 10 seconds. In
m
sascha wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
>
> [Clock behaviour in suspend]
> > But I take your point...the answer is: no, it's not easy (with my
> > simple patch). I'm not sure what the behavior should be (hide on
> > idle?!, come out of suspend once a
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
[Clock behaviour in suspend]
But I take your point...the answer is: no, it's not easy (with my
simple patch). I'm not sure what the behavior should be (hide on
idle?!, come out of suspend once a minute?!), really.
With the XO going
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:43:36AM -0500, Jameson Quinn wrote:
> In other words, IMO this should be two patches: a clock device icon; and the
> ability to put device icons in lower left, lower right, or upper
> right.
Fair enough.
> now-I-can-go-back-to-building-my-own-bikeshed-ly y'rs,
;)
> Ja
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:08:29AM -0400, p...@laptop.org wrote:
> sounds like there is, but to be sure: it's easy for people to
> remove or disable if they don't like having a stopped clock on
> their screen during idle suspend on an XO?
The clock refreshes itself when the Frame is shown, so it'
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:49:05AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Martin Dengler
> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> Hi Martin,
> >>
> >> I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon
> >> extension, so
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon
>> extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more
>> easily. Why is it in
+2 to having a clock
+0 to being able to place it in any of the 8 corners of the frame by a
one-line code change
-1 to those two pieces of code being in the same patch
In other words, IMO this should be two patches: a clock device icon; and the
ability to put device icons in lower left, lower righ
martin wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon
> > extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more
> > easily. Why is it inside the shell instead?
>
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 10:28:06AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon
> extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more
> easily. Why is it inside the shell instead?
The code (clock.py) is in fact a dev
Hi Martin,
I was hoping the frame clock could be implemented as a device icon
extension, so people could add it, remove it and customize it more
easily. Why is it inside the shell instead?
Btw, do you want me to ask in olpc-sur how people already using 8.2
would like the clock to look like?
Than
---
src/jarabe/frame/clock.py | 108 +
src/jarabe/frame/frame.py |7 +++
2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/jarabe/frame/clock.py
diff --git a/src/jarabe/frame/clock.py b/src/jarabe/frame/clock.py
new file mo
18 matches
Mail list logo
