Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] sugar-activity: make independent of sugar-toolkit GTK versions

2011-12-13 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Daniel Drake's message of 2011-12-09 22:25:28 +0100: As we move to adding support for a second UI toolkit (GTK+ 3.x), the sugar-activity binary used by all activities must become backend-toolkit-independent. Given that sugar-activity is the only thing in sugar that Python-based

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] sugar-activity: make independent of sugar-toolkit GTK versions

2011-12-13 Thread Daniel Drake
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Excerpts from Daniel Drake's message of 2011-12-09 22:25:28 +0100: As we move to adding support for a second UI toolkit (GTK+ 3.x), the sugar-activity binary used by all activities must become

[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] sugar-activity: make independent of sugar-toolkit GTK versions

2011-12-09 Thread Daniel Drake
As we move to adding support for a second UI toolkit (GTK+ 3.x), the sugar-activity binary used by all activities must become backend-toolkit-independent. It would be wasteful to have two backend toolkits loaded in memory, and in the GTK2/GTK3 case, it is impossible (importing both results in an