On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> As we're there, how do we get rid of the useless UL screen with its ugly
> inverted color scheme?
For OLPC builds we'd need a product safety review to remove it. ;-)
For deployment builds, you could hide /usr/sbin/ul-warning ...
bernie wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:32 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
>
> > However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar
> > and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly.
> > Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL scr
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:32 +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar
> and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly.
> Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and
> power off.
As we'r
On 21 April 2010 19:07, James Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>> Since I've run into the same issue before (i.e. with HAL), I suppose
>> the default is the same but the OLPC builds explicitly configure HAL
>> to allow shutdowns even for multiple sessi
Sascha wrote:
> HAL is dead, ConsoleKit now handles shutdown / reboot.
I still prefer the "/sbin/shutdown" approach taken in sl#615 to the D-Bus based
mechanisms that Tomeu prefers but I am concerned that this may be an area of
irreconcilable difference between Tomeu and myself. Therefore, in the
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Since I've run into the same issue before (i.e. with HAL), I suppose
> the default is the same but the OLPC builds explicitly configure HAL
> to allow shutdowns even for multiple sessions?
I've looked and not found where this might oc
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:12:43AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I thought the point of these patches was to move from HAL to
> ConsoleKit so surely it should work whether HAL is there or not
> especially with everyone moving away from HAL to
> ConsoleKit/upower/udisk/udev etc/
The failure was un
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:12:43AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 AM, James Cameron wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Now, if one also stops HAL, the shutdown or restart options don't
work, and shell.log says:
I thought the point
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi James/Sascha,
>> > Reviewed-by: James Cameron
>> Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards-
>> compatibility break this is.
>
> No, I only did a
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi James/Sascha,
Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards-
compatibility break this is.
While the actual patch was only tested on XO-1, I tried out the
ConsoleKit API on XO-1.5 first.
Both times Debian sque
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:18:53PM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for
action: org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users
auth_admin_keep_always
After the patch is applied, Sugar's shutdow
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:32:28AM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
> dbus.exceptions.DBusException:
> org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for action:
> org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users
> auth_admin_keep_always
After the patch is applied, Sugar's
james wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:37:54PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> > so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques
> > is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown?
> > (other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't
> > running?)
>
> Le
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:37:54PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques
> is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown?
> (other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't
> running?)
Lets Sugar hop the privilege barrier
james wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> > Hi James/Sascha,
> >> Reviewed-by: James Cameron
> > Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards-
> > compatibility break this is.
>
> No, I only did a code review and cross-check ag
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi James/Sascha,
>> Reviewed-by: James Cameron
> Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards-
> compatibility break this is.
No, I only did a code review and cross-check against ConsoleKit API
documentation
Hi James/Sascha,
> Reviewed-by: James Cameron
Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards-
compatibility break this is.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball
One Laptop Per Child
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab
Reviewed-by: James Cameron
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
HAL is dead, ConsoleKit now handles shutdown / reboot.
Shutdown tested on Debian squeeze with consolekit 0.4.1-4.
Reboot mode cannot be triggered by UI in Sugar 0.88, so not tested.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe
---
src/jarabe/model/session.py | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+),
19 matches
Mail list logo
