On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 08:38 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-17 11:07:13 +0200:
>>
>> - powerpc is not a popular Sugar platform to make an enormous effort for
>>> supporting it
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't
On 10/18/2011 09:48 AM, James Cameron wrote:
Reviewed-by: James Cameron
Acked as well by Sascha on irc, pushed to master and the 0.94 branch.
http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/commit/64aae3b42c259af85db4051aa54c74a1b303f21b
Regards,
Simon
Reviewed-by: James Cameron
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent.
As the firmware version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. On the XO we display a human re
On 10/17/2011 08:38 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-17 11:07:13 +0200:
- powerpc is not a popular Sugar platform to make an enormous effort for
supporting it
I wouldn't consider anything we discussed an "enormous effort". With
that attitude PowerPC
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-17 11:07:13 +0200:
> - powerpc is not a popular Sugar platform to make an enormous effort for
> supporting it
I wouldn't consider anything we discussed an "enormous effort". With
that attitude PowerPC would never be a viable platform. Catch-22.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:07:13AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> - the string does always start with "CL": CL1 for XO-1, CL1B for
> XO-1.5, CL2 for XO-1.75, ...
Actually, it also starts with CL1 for XO-1.5, we didn't change it, even
though we used CL1B elsewhere. At the time I was talking abou
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 10:37 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/2011 09:36 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:18AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
def _parse_firmware_number(firmware_no):
if firmwa
On 10/17/2011 10:37 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 10/17/2011 09:36 AM, James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:18AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
def _parse_firmware_number(firmware_no):
if firmware_no is None:
firmware_no = _not_available
else:
# try to extract Open Firmware versi
On 10/17/2011 09:36 AM, James Cameron wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:18AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
def _parse_firmware_number(firmware_no):
if firmware_no is None:
firmware_no = _not_available
else:
# try to extract Open Firmware version from OLPC style
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:18AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> def _parse_firmware_number(firmware_no):
> if firmware_no is None:
> firmware_no = _not_available
> else:
> # try to extract Open Firmware version from OLPC style
> # version string, e.g. "CL2 Q4B1
On 10/09/2011 08:55 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 18:01:35 +0200:
The serial number is often only readable by root on non-XO
hardware, that is why we do not read it. If the serial number
can not be found on an XO we display the entry as 'Not avai
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:55:27PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> def _parse_firmware_number(firmware_no):
> if firmware_no is None:
> return _not_available
>
> firmware_no = firmware_no.replace('\0', ' ').strip()
>
> # try to extract Open Firmware version from OLPC style versio
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 18:01:35 +0200:
> The serial number is often only readable by root on non-XO
> hardware, that is why we do not read it. If the serial number
> can not be found on an XO we display the entry as 'Not available'.
[...]
> -def get_firmware_number
On 10/09/2011 05:22 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 12:54:40 +0200:
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ def get_serial_number():
serial_no = _read_file(os.path.join(_OFW_TREE, _SN))
elif os.path.exists(os.path.join(_PROC_TREE, _SN)):
ser
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. As ethtool has become a depedenc
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-09 12:54:40 +0200:
> >> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ def get_serial_number():
> >> serial_no = _read_file(os.path.join(_OFW_TREE, _SN))
> >> elif os.path.exists(os.path.join(_PROC_TREE, _SN)):
> >> serial_no = _read_file(os.path.jo
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. As ethtool has become a depedenc
On 10/08/2011 09:57 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-07 11:13:15 +0200:
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent.
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-07 11:13:15 +0200:
> '/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
> instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
> chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
> version we display the
'/ofw' is not used anymore on the XO, '/proc/device-tree' is used now
instead. Instead of just adjusting for that change we took the
chance to make the section hardware independent. As the firmware
version we display the bios version if available on non XO
hardware. As ethtool has become a depedenc
21 matches
Mail list logo