On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:20:16AM +0200, Tony Anderson wrote:
> This thread still refers to Samson Goddy obtaining a visa to attend
> a Scratch Conference in Bordeaux France. I still have no idea how
> this thread got distracted to discussing details of software
> licensing. The primary issue here
This thread still refers to Samson Goddy obtaining a visa to attend a
Scratch Conference in Bordeaux France. I still have
no idea how this thread got distracted to discussing details of software
licensing. The primary issue here is whether or not
he can get a visa and can attend the conference.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:06:06AM +0200, Tony Anderson wrote:
> It must be a sign of a mature organization that it has so much time to
> devote to this.
Dealing with the strictures of the law and of various agreements is not, as
you might cast it, some luxury that we are indulging in.
This is o
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:06:06AM +0200, Tony Anderson wrote:
> It must be a sign of a mature organization that it has so much time
> to devote to this.
It helps them avoid real work, like maintaining activities. ;-)
> Keep in mind, Samson is going to a Scratch conference. As I
> understand it,
It must be a sign of a mature organization that it has so much time to
devote to this. Keep in mind, Samson is going to a Scratch conference.
As I understand it, Scratch is now based on Flash. The nature of Flash
makes 'open source' and 'free software' a bit problematic.
Tony
On 06/13/2017 11
Open Source and Free Software are not mutually exclusive terms.
Perhaps you are thinking of the distinctions between copyleft software
versus permissively licensed software?
For those to whom this is old news, please forgive this brief review, but it
seems important at this point to get it out t
On Jun 12, 2017 1:33 PM, "Adam Holt" wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez
wrote:
> Sorry I did not reply before.
>
> It's a yes (+1) for me.
> Let's hope everyone votes now!
>
Yes! This motion will pass (4 out of 7 votes is the bare minimum) with a
big thanks to all for s
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> My experience with the SFC is that while they like to do license
> enforcement, they are not platform purists. If you look at the bottom of
> sfconservancy.org they have their own social media accounts.
>
I completely agree with this. T
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Ignacio Rodríguez
wrote:
> Sorry I did not reply before.
>
> It's a yes (+1) for me.
> Let's hope everyone votes now!
>
Yes! This motion will pass (4 out of 7 votes is the bare minimum) with a
big thanks to all for staying engaged in support of Sugar Labs, until
Sorry I did not reply before.
It's a yes (+1) for me.
Let's hope everyone votes now!
Thanks,
Ignacio
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Samson Goddy
> wrote:
>
>> To those members who haven't voted.. could you please come and vote.
>>
>
> Tha
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Samson Goddy wrote:
> To those members who haven't voted.. could you please come and vote.
>
Thanks you Ignacio, Lionel & Laura if you can please vote Yes or No
immediately !!
PS i (presume) this motion expires 3:28 PM NYC Time today, in 7+ hours from
now, i.e.
To those members who haven't voted.. could you please come and vote. It is
very disappointing that this motion is still pending. I am to travel to
lagos tomorrow and i really need to know what will happen to the motion.
Samson G
On Jun 9, 2017 11:30 AM, "Adam Holt" wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2017 7:59
12 matches
Mail list logo
