On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:15 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
>> > Morally, the sugar coating is not the best thing to promote the sugar
>> > platform. BUT we can't wait for the supertux developer to sugarize their
>> > application and we all nee
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:15 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:
> > Morally, the sugar coating is not the best thing to promote the sugar
> > platform. BUT we can't wait for the supertux developer to sugarize their
> > application and we all need supertux. So...
>
> It's definitely a start, and better than
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
This is very good news. I am all for a Sugar wrapper to smooth things
out for users.
One quick comment however.
For something that is meant to be a thin wrapper around other people's
work, GPL is a bit of a thorny choice of license. Distribut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is probably something that would be of interest to sugar-devel as well.
On 07/27/2010 03:11 PM, tom-ipp wrote:
> Hi,
> I wrote a small script in python which lets me "sugarcoat" linux
> application for sugar.
> In fact, you call the script with t
4 matches
Mail list logo
