Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to
On 13 February 2010 09:15, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
If nobody complains by the end of this weekend, I'll just upload the
images, put a GPLv2+ license in the archive and make a tarball, as this
is what they've been listed under in Strawberry and Blueberry, too.
--Sebastian
Tim McNamara wrote:
On 13 February 2010 09:15, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
mailto:sebast...@when.com wrote:
If nobody complains by the end of this weekend, I'll just upload the
images, put a GPLv2+ license in the archive and make a tarball, as this
is what they've been
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 16:15, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote:
And I guess from how our logo policy [3] looks like, we might need to
have a some more restrictive one there
IANAL, but from my understanding, the license of the logo file does not change the trademark license, which
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.comwrote:
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Hi folks,
I've lately taken the task of packaging more activities to get us a
reasonably user experience for the next iteration of SoaS. The normal
review process requires an application to be properly and clearly
licensed. I'd like to encourage activity authors to
6 matches
Mail list logo
