Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-18 Thread Lionel Laské
Hmm. You're right, the repository name had changed (sugarizer instead of Sugarizer) because I'm working on the next release. I've fixed the sugarizer.org web site. It should works now. Lionel. 2014-05-18 1:02 GMT+02:00 sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org: In fact, I do

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-18 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On the 18th of May 2014, Lionel Laské wrote: While you are already updating your website you may want to take care of some typos: Sugarizer is distributed in the form of 3 components: It could work on any device ...and has also been tested...Sugarizer Thin Client doesn't need... but requires

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-18 Thread Lionel Laské
Sure I will do. Thanks. Lionel. 2014-05-18 11:10 GMT+02:00 Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com: On the 18th of May 2014, Lionel Laské wrote: While you are already updating your website you may want to take care of some typos:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-17 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On 14th of March 2014 05:05, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On 13th of March 2014 15:52, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com mailto:stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: On 13th of March 2014 15:06, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-17 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
http://sugarizer.org/ On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: On 14th of March 2014 05:05, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On 13th of March 2014 15:52, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Christian Stroetmann

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-17 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Thanks Gonzalo, In fact, I do know the web loaction. But I only tried to run the Thin Client again yesterday by pushing on the button Run it now! respectively by following the hyperlinks to llaske.github.io/Sugarizer/ and, honestly, because llaske.github.io is not accessable at all, I have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-14 Thread Sam Parkinson
Hi, Another (almost the same) example to check out is https://github.com/adobe/brackets-shell All of these seem to be based off CEF3 (chrome embedded framework). Just BTW: I played around with CEF3 python with GTK. It really doesn't work :( I really like the idea of using some CEF3 thing to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-14 Thread Sai Vineet
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Another (almost the same) example to check out is https://github.com/adobe/brackets-shell All of these seem to be based off CEF3 (chrome embedded framework). Just BTW: I played around with CEF3 python with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
A few days ago, I saw a FirefoxOS cellphone. I wonder if we can run Sugar web on that. Gonzalo On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Yes it's basically node.js + chrome + some custom bits to integrate the two. It would be perfect to write an OS fully in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yes, that's a good option too. I have not been following too closely but there seem to be a bit of a push to get it to fully work also on stock linux (rather than on the android derivative they use on phones), which would be useful for us. On 13 May 2014 13:30, Gonzalo Odiard

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Aloha Everybody Why don't you ask the creators of the Sugarfox project? Seriously, FirefoxOS is an Android with Firefox as desktop, simply said. Even the development environment is based on Firefox. So what works on Firefox should directly work on FirefoxOS as well. This leads us to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Everybody Why don't you ask the creators of the Sugarfox project? Because I can't find anything about that on internet? Seriously, FirefoxOS is an Android with Firefox as desktop, simply said.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On 13th of March 2014 15:06, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com mailto:stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Everybody Why don't you ask the creators of the Sugarfox project? Because I can't find anything about that

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: On 13th of March 2014 15:06, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Everybody Why don't you ask the creators of the Sugarfox

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-13 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On 13th of March 2014 15:52, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com mailto:stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: On 13th of March 2014 15:06, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Christian Stroetmann

[Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi, github recently open sourced the shell they used to build the atom editor https://github.com/atom/atom-shell It sounds like it would be a pretty cool base for a future html5 only sugar. Or event just mostly-html5, it seems like this could be easily integrated with python stuff. Also it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-12 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
This use node.js too, right? Gonzalo On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, github recently open sourced the shell they used to build the atom editor https://github.com/atom/atom-shell It sounds like it would be a pretty cool base for a future

Re: [Sugar-devel] Atom shell

2014-05-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Yes it's basically node.js + chrome + some custom bits to integrate the two. It would be perfect to write an OS fully in js (dream or nightmare? :P). On 12 May 2014 16:33, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: This use node.js too, right? Gonzalo On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:26 AM,