Sascha Silbe writes:
> For most modules the directory name is the same as the module name (with
> version appended in case of tarballs). For xulrunner it's different for
> historical reasons. I had the hope we could get rid of xulrunner
> completely (as a module of sugar-jhbuild), but as this has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:11:11PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> You wrote in ticket 137 that *hulahop* is broken in *Debian*:
> Ah, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. I was tal
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
You wrote in ticket 137 that *hulahop* is broken in *Debian*:
Ah, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. I was talking about hulahop in
sugar-jhbuild, which doesn't build against the Debian-shipped xulrunner.
(hint: maybe _I_ can h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 04:59:26PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:37:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> Do you mean that this is the case only for sugar-jhbuild or also for
>> packaged sugar-xulrunner?
> I don't kno
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:37:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Do you mean that this is the case only for sugar-jhbuild or also for
packaged sugar-xulrunner?
I don't know anything about the sugar-xulrunner package, you have to ask
the Ubuntu team about that. I only maintain sugar-jhbuild, no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:50:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> As for your problem, I would not recommend compiling xulrunner
>> yourself (if jhbuild even supports that) - yo
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
So why did I need to "rm -rf source/mozilla source/hulahop" before
rebuilding?
Politically correct answer: because xulrunner often breaks after updates
and rebuilding it from scratch fixes it.
Maybe I miss something here, but the hard p
Sascha Silbe writes:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:19:04PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean?
> It's by design. Only changed portions of the code should get
> rebuilt. Doing a full rebuild each time would be a huge waste of
> resources.
So
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:19:04PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean?
It's by design. Only changed portions of the code should get rebuilt.
Doing a full rebuild each time would be a huge waste of resources.
Or maybe we could have ./sugar-j
Sascha Silbe writes:
> Please check you've installed all dependencies (i.e. ./sugar-jhbuild
> depscheck returns nothing), remove old build results (rm -rf
> source/mozilla source/hulahop) and try again (./sugar-jhbuild build).
Maybe ./sugar-jhbuild could make sure that directories are clean?
Or
Sascha Silbe writes:
> Unfortunately we have to do that (compiling xulrunner ourselves in
> sugar-jhbuild) because Debian changed the xulrunner location [1]. While
> the new location (...-1.9) is way better (and should be changed upstream
> as well), hulahop currently only supports the upstream w
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:03:03AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
| ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member
../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| make[3]: *** [libxul.so] Erreur 1
Please check you've installed all dependencies (i.e
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:04:37AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
As for your problem, I would not recommend compiling xulrunner
yourself (if jhbuild even supports that) - you should probably instead
install xulrunner-dev.
Unfortunately we have to do that (compiling xulrunner ourselves in
suga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:03:03AM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>Still failing to compile sugar-jhbuild:
>
>,
>| ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member
>../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object
>| collect2: ld returned
Still failing to compile sugar-jhbuild:
,
| ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member
../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| make[3]: *** [libxul.so] Erreur 1
`
I'm running GNU/Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26
15 matches
Mail list logo
