Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-29 Thread Aleksey Lim
Hi all, While answering to Michael's questions (though questions are still not fully answered but restructured, since the right question is 51% of an answer), I've composed a document which is a result of my, 2y, being a FOSS contributor and sugar participant:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-27 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:33:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: 1. I am *much* more likely to read and/or participate in your discussions if they occur in email as opposed to in IRC. I agree. Mail is asynchronous. I tend not to use IRC for Sugar discussions, though my attention can be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-27 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:47:03AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:05:40AM +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:16:47PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: What about having [only] upcoming meeting on nearest weekends, something like Saturday, 22:00 UTC?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 16:51:00 + Aleksey Lim wrote: These are good questions. I personally think that having more formalized ML discussion (to take core team decisions) will be a huge plus (it is impossible to take any decision only during a meeting) and not only for people who prefer

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Tue Oct 26 05:40:27 +0200 2010: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:39:48AM +1300, Tim McNamara wrote: 14:00 UTC is 2am for me.. It is 1am for me. I won't be attending because /dev/brain will have shut down for the day. Same question as for Tim: What times

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:45:21PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: For me, default time is ok Wednesday 2010-10-27, 14:00 UTC irc://irc.freenode.net#sugar-meeting How about other possible attenders? +1 pgp18CYjHMMue.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:47:41AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: Same question as for Tim: What times would be preferred by resp. acceptable for you? UTC 21 to UTC 06. During the summer, which is now, here. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread Tabitha Roder
People UTC - Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org any James Cameron qu...@laptop.org-11 Martin Dengler

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:56:17AM -0700, Tabitha Roder wrote: People UTC - Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org any James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Aleksey Lim's message of Tue Oct 26 17:22:28 +0200 2010: I hope interested in people will manage to bear one meeting on Saturday, 2010-10-30, 22:00 UTC :). I don't think I'll be able to participate this Saturday, I'm afraid. :( The next one (06.11.) should be fine. Sascha --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-26 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:16:47PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: What about having [only] upcoming meeting on nearest weekends, something like Saturday, 22:00 UTC? Nak. Already booked, weekly event, high priority. http://whenisgood.net/ may interest you, it is a way to schedule an event ... I've

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Since we don't have team lead (for a long time) there a bunch of questions that need to be fixed. (imho, we might not even need team lead for Development Team, all questions might be solved in process while,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:09:22PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: Hi all, Since we don't have team lead (for a long time) there a bunch of questions that need to be fixed. (imho, we might not even need team lead for Development Team, all questions might be solved in process while, weekly/daily

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:13:24AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Since we don't have team lead (for a long time) there a bunch of questions that need to be fixed. (imho, we might not even need team lead

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:13:24AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all, Since we don't have team lead (for a long time) there a bunch of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:29:07PM +, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:13:24AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: Hi all,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Jose Abente Lahaye
Great initiative :) See you all there. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.orgwrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:29:07PM +, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:13:24AM

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Steven Parrish
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Martin Jose Abente Lahaye martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com wrote: Great initiative :) See you all there. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:29:07PM +, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Tim McNamara
On 26 October 2010 02:45, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:29:07PM +, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:13:24AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Aleksey Lim's message of Mon Oct 25 15:45:21 +0200 2010: For me, default time is ok Wednesday 2010-10-27, 14:00 UTC irc://irc.freenode.net#sugar-meeting How about other possible attenders? Mon-Wed is fine with me in general. Thu evening (CET ~= UTC) and Fri-Sun

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:39:48AM +1300, Tim McNamara wrote: On 26 October 2010 02:45, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:29:07PM +, Walter Bender wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 25,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Tim McNamara's message of Mon Oct 25 21:39:48 +0200 2010: 14:00 UTC is 2am for me.. If I have anything to contribute on the agenda items, should I send an email to sugar-devel or the meeting chair? Would you like to participate regularly and/or this time? For a specific topic or

Re: [Sugar-devel] Development Meetings

2010-10-25 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:39:48AM +1300, Tim McNamara wrote: 14:00 UTC is 2am for me.. It is 1am for me. I won't be attending because /dev/brain will have shut down for the day. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing