Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 15 SoaS release and Csound5

2011-06-14 Thread Peter Robinson
Art, Setting buildRelease=1 to one has no affect on the build. With that set when I look at the build logs it still reports building the new Parser. We use to set buildRelease=0 in all previous releases. Why they would swap this around is beyond me! Can you forward details on to them because I can

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 15 SoaS release and Csound5

2011-06-13 Thread Art Hunkins
Peter, My feelings exactly. As regards Csound, most of our listservs are users; developers are relatively few and tend to communicate largely among themselves. Though I also am a member of csound-dev, I was unaware of the old/new parser status. I knew the new parser was (and has been long) "un

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 15 SoaS release and Csound5

2011-06-13 Thread Peter Robinson
Art, It seems I did get the mail but some how missed it. Sigh! How so typical of CSound to make the new parser the default even though they themselves don't recommend it, nor do they really even document it anywhere! GRR! I'll have a look at the build and see what else it will affect, csound isn

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 15 SoaS release and Csound5

2011-06-13 Thread Art Hunkins
Peter - Did you ever receive the messages collated below? (They largely occurred on the csound-dev list.) Are the questions you mentioned (ones that were never answered) the ones addressed here? If not, please send them again. To my knowledge, the simple "Csound solution" is running scons

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 15 SoaS release and Csound5

2011-06-08 Thread Art Hunkins
Peter: I presume you received the messages immediately listed below, regarding a solution to the old/new Csound parser issue ("build csound with the scons option buildRelease=1"). If you sent questions either to this group, or the Csound-developers list, I'm sorry; I didn't receive them. Ar