Re: [Sugar-devel] File formats in Write

2010-05-31 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:33:56AM +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: > Perhaps have the default presented at the top of the list in bold? I wasn't able to figure out how to make it bold, but listing it is certainly easy. On XO-1.5 build os125, editing the /home/olpc/Activities/Read.activity/toolba

Re: [Sugar-devel] File formats in Write

2010-05-31 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 31 May 2010 19:58, Sascha Silbe wrote: > Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Mon May 31 09:11:39 + 2010: >> This is a good point. It has been suggested before that we expose in >> the journal the underlying format of each entry, when that's something >> standardized. > We already show t

Re: [Sugar-devel] File formats in Write

2010-05-31 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Mon May 31 09:11:39 + 2010: > This is a good point. It has been suggested before that we expose in > the journal the underlying format of each entry, when that's something > standardized. We already show the MIME type in the details view, but I suppose yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] File formats in Write

2010-05-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 13:30, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote: > Write saves to ODT by default, and optionally exports to plain text, > RTF and HTML. > > Since the ODT option is silent, I have encountered many people who > believe that text, RTF and HTML are the only choices if you want to > keep your w

[Sugar-devel] File formats in Write

2010-05-30 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
Write saves to ODT by default, and optionally exports to plain text, RTF and HTML. Since the ODT option is silent, I have encountered many people who believe that text, RTF and HTML are the only choices if you want to keep your work and share with others. I'm not sure what the best way to do this