-
From: Caroline Meeks
To: Gary C Martin
Cc: Sugar Devel
Sent: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Bugs] #925 HIGH: Scratch is not sugarized
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
On 3 Jun 2009, at 13:53, Caroline Meeks wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2009, at 13:53, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Should this bug really get closed or is there some other state it could be
>> in?
>>
>
> I'd say a trac ticket must have a real named owner to be of any use.
>
> Sugarizing Scrat
On 3 Jun 2009, at 13:53, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should this bug really get closed or is there some other state it
> could be in?
I'd say a trac ticket must have a real named owner to be of any use.
> Sugarizing Scratch is clearly a legitimate feature request.
It's more an onerous tas
Hi,
Should this bug really get closed or is there some other state it could be
in?
Sugarizing Scratch is clearly a legitimate feature request. I'm not saying
sdz should do it this week, but if someone came along and wanted to do
something this task should definitely be on the list of tasks a Suga
4 matches
Mail list logo
