2013/3/27 Daniel Narvaez :
> On 26 March 2013 21:55, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>> Right Daniel, could be. At some point of the gtk3 port and touch
>> feature development it became a waste of efforts to bother the list
>> with our patches. It was like a theatre play, Simon or me sending a
>> patch,
On 26 March 2013 21:55, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> Right Daniel, could be. At some point of the gtk3 port and touch
> feature development it became a waste of efforts to bother the list
> with our patches. It was like a theatre play, Simon or me sending a
> patch, the other ack-ing or nack-ing, no
On 03/26/2013 09:55 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/3/26 Daniel Narvaez :
[...]
We also had periodic design meetings guiding
features.
I wonder if that kind of discussion could be had on the mailing list
rather than in meetings. It's problematic to find a time that works
for everyone and ma
2013/3/26 Daniel Narvaez :
> On 26 March 2013 12:21, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>> When I started in this project, my patches received reviews from many
>> people, not only maintainers. Many discussions went by. I don't see
>> that happening anymore.
>
> Could it be because most patches are posted i
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Anish Mangal wrote:
> I don't have a dog in the fight, but I can give my two cents
> (disclaimer: I'm sorry if I misunderstood facts or misquoted people):
>
> What could this mean in context of sugar/mainline:
> * Have one or two maintainers. Simon and Man
On 26 March 2013 18:57, Anish Mangal wrote:
> What could this mean in context of sugar/mainline:
> * Have one or two maintainers. Simon and Manuq are excellent. They are
> responsible for setting roadmaps, deadlines, and making releases.
> * Have multiple people with commit access authority. Danie
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Anish Mangal wrote:
> I don't have a dog in the fight, but I can give my two cents
> (disclaimer: I'm sorry if I misunderstood facts or misquoted people):
>
> With dextrose, we had the same bottleneck problem, of patches getting
> stuck in the review queue, then
I don't have a dog in the fight, but I can give my two cents
(disclaimer: I'm sorry if I misunderstood facts or misquoted people):
With dextrose, we had the same bottleneck problem, of patches getting
stuck in the review queue, then the commit queue. One associated
problem is that the longer a pat
On 26 March 2013 12:21, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> When I started in this project, my patches received reviews from many
> people, not only maintainers. Many discussions went by. I don't see
> that happening anymore.
Could it be because most patches are posted in trac now? I'm not sure
it's the o
On 26 March 2013 12:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>>
>> I would like to applaud the discussion.
>>
>> Yes, I think we are blocking too much, in regards to stuff that is out
>> of bugfixing, and polishing the gtk3 port. This is indeed not good
>> for
On 03/26/2013 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I would like to applaud the discussion.
Yes, I think we are blocking too much, in regards to stuff that is out
of bugfixing, and polishing the gtk3 port. This is indeed not good
for the community.
When I started in this project, my patches receive
I would like to applaud the discussion.
Yes, I think we are blocking too much, in regards to stuff that is out
of bugfixing, and polishing the gtk3 port. This is indeed not good
for the community.
When I started in this project, my patches received reviews from many
people, not only maintainers.
On 03/26/2013 11:13 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 26 March 2013 10:53, Simon Schampijer wrote:
That is bad of course. Could have been several reasons. Maybe the decoupling
of patches and the bug tracker, maybe just felt of the table... Sometimes a
ping is valid option. But yes, the easiest area
On 26 March 2013 10:53, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> That is bad of course. Could have been several reasons. Maybe the decoupling
> of patches and the bug tracker, maybe just felt of the table... Sometimes a
> ping is valid option. But yes, the easiest area to solve.
I did try to ping a couple of ti
On 03/25/2013 09:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Forgot to reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Narvaez
Date: 25 March 2013 21:12
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal on how to speed up patch reviews
To: Simon Schampijer
On 25 March 2013 12:37, Simon Schampijer wro
Forgot to reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Narvaez
Date: 25 March 2013 21:12
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal on how to speed up patch reviews
To: Simon Schampijer
On 25 March 2013 12:37, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> To improve that situation, I think we have
16 matches
Mail list logo
