Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM string question

2012-07-16 Thread Chris Leonard
Sascha, Ok, I accept that they serve a purpose still, I just wanted to make sure they were not inadvertently held over from 0.96 to 0.97. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, cjl On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > Chris Leonard writes: > >> Can someone please explain the

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSM string question

2012-07-16 Thread Sascha Silbe
Chris Leonard writes: > Can someone please explain the purpose of these GSM strings? > > In Sugar 0.94, they did *NOT* say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED), but in Sugar > 0.96 and Sugar 0.97, they say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) > > If they are really deprecated or unused, why are we still carrying > them in the UI?

[Sugar-devel] GSM string question

2012-07-15 Thread Chris Leonard
Can someone please explain the purpose of these GSM strings? In Sugar 0.94, they did *NOT* say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED), but in Sugar 0.96 and Sugar 0.97, they say (DEPRECATED/UNUSED) If they are really deprecated or unused, why are we still carrying them in the UI? #: ../data/sugar.schemas.in.h:18