Re: [Sugar-devel] I hear you

2009-03-31 Thread David Farning
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 03/29/09 23:42, qu...@laptop.org wrote: >> I've tested twinkle and it worked quite well for point to point calls. >> Both it and ihu could probably be modified to accept appropriate >> parameters to operate within the Sugar context if n

Re: [Sugar-devel] I hear you

2009-03-31 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 03/29/09 23:42, qu...@laptop.org wrote: > I've tested twinkle and it worked quite well for point to point calls. > Both it and ihu could probably be modified to accept appropriate > parameters to operate within the Sugar context if needed. > > I'm also aware of someone working again on the poin

Re: [Sugar-devel] I hear you

2009-03-31 Thread quozl
I've tested twinkle and it worked quite well for point to point calls. Both it and ihu could probably be modified to accept appropriate parameters to operate within the Sugar context if needed. I'm also aware of someone working again on the point-multipoint audio idea that I tried out a couple of

[Sugar-devel] I hear you

2009-03-29 Thread Sameer Verma
Just came across ihu or I Hear You (http://ihu.sourceforge.net/), a peer-to-peer audio app. As compared to Asterisk, it takes the PBX dependency out of the picture. You do need to know the end point's IP. I haven't tried it on the XO as yet, but sounds like a good fit (no pun intended). cheers, Sa