Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-24 Thread Dave Crossland
On 24 April 2016 at 16:06, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 24.04.2016, at 06:41, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On 23 April 2016 at 22:52, wrote: > >> E-Toys is just a black screen on my Note 5. >> > > That's a pity! Etoys seems to me to be one of the most important yet > undervalued Sugar Activities :

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 24.04.2016, at 06:41, Dave Crossland wrote: > On 23 April 2016 at 22:52, > wrote: > E-Toys is just a black screen on my Note 5. > > That's a pity! Etoys seems to me to be one of the most important yet > undervalued Sugar Activities :) Pulling in a newer versio

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
From a programming perspective, I would rather start with Sugarizer where there are numerous code examples, folk ready to help, and a functional framework. An interesting opportunity is to show how an application can be built to run in Sugarizer and be packaged as an independent Android app.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
GCompris is available as an Android app. Very popular with primary school learners (enjoyed by teachers as well). Tony On 04/24/2016 12:41 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi On 23 April 2016 at 22:52, > wrote: E-Toys is just a black screen on my Note 5. That's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread justin
Dave, Yes, if sugarizer were more mature/reliable I would probably just target it directly. On 2016-04-23 23:41, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi On 23 April 2016 at 22:52, wrote: E-Toys is just a black screen on my Note 5. That's a pity! Etoys seems to me to be one of the most important yet u

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 23 April 2016 at 22:52, wrote: > E-Toys is just a black screen on my Note 5. > That's a pity! Etoys seems to me to be one of the most important yet undervalued Sugar Activities :) The "Squeakers DVD" in http://squeakland.org/resources/audioVisual/ is cool, shows how powerful it can be fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
On 23 April 2016 at 23:12, Tony Anderson wrote: > Please send this information to Lionel Laske (lio...@olpc-france.org). > Better, file it as an issue in https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/issues :) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
I think you are already making a contribution. Please send this information to Lionel Laske (lio...@olpc-france.org). Go ahead on activities. You will undoubtedly have to check that the activity works well in Sugarizer as well, but you can be confident that it will work. Tony On 04/24/2016 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread justin
I've tested on my Note5, my daughter's Nabi 2, an older Galaxy Tab, and the chrome Web App. There are some glitches in different activities. There isn't a way to add/remove/manage activities available within the app. Little details get in the way. My phone's status-bar covers up part of the s

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
Activities for Sugarizer can also be run in Sugar as sugar-web-activities. Sugarizer is already available as an Android app. So naturally, that is our interest in the Sugar community. Tony On 04/24/2016 10:14 AM, justin@polymath.ninja wrote: Tony, I know that Sugarizer is established, but I'

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
On 23 April 2016 at 22:14, wrote: > Once Sugarizer is more mature I'll probably target it directly, but right > now it doesn't seem like its there yet. What do you think "there" would be like? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread justin
Tony, I know that Sugarizer is established, but I'm not going only target Sugar. I'm also trying to keep what I create as able to be stand-alone apps as well. Once Sugarizer is more mature I'll probably target it directly, but right now it doesn't seem like its there yet. On 2016-04-23 19:58

Re: [Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
Sugarizer is available for Android and provides an established framework with many examples. Using it will be more valuable to Sugar and will enable you to concentrate on adding new activities. Tony On 04/24/2016 05:09 AM, Justin Overton wrote: I've decided to target Android and iOS using the

[Sugar-devel] Javascript Activities

2016-04-23 Thread Justin Overton
I've decided to target Android and iOS using the Ionic Platform with cordova. Since Ionic already supports several platforms, it might be worthwhile to create a set of cvs overrides to enable it to also target sugar. I'd be happy to work on such a project, but I don't know the sugar platform well