On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2014-03-26 19:23 GMT-03:00 Martin Abente :
>> notify_user sounds good to me :)
+1
>
> Same to me, notify_user fits best. I meant to add my comment below
> that one, sorry.
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote
2014-03-26 19:23 GMT-03:00 Martin Abente :
> notify_user sounds good to me :)
Same to me, notify_user fits best. I meant to add my comment below
that one, sorry.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>>
>> 2014-03-26 18:12 GMT-03:00 James Cameron :
>> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2
notify_user sounds good to me :)
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
> 2014-03-26 18:12 GMT-03:00 James Cameron :
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:40:41AM -0300, Martin Abente wrote:
> >> His work is almost done [2,3,4], but it introduces a new method to
> >> the base Activity
2014-03-26 18:12 GMT-03:00 James Cameron :
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:40:41AM -0300, Martin Abente wrote:
>> His work is almost done [2,3,4], but it introduces a new method to
>> the base Activity class, therefore I wanted your opinions regarding
>> the name of this method, the current options ar
>
>
> "sugar_shell_add_notification_and_send_to_user" would be the worst.
>
>
Maybe is a good name for a Java implementation :)
--
Gonzalo Odiard
SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
ht
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:40:41AM -0300, Martin Abente wrote:
> His work is almost done [2,3,4], but it introduces a new method to
> the base Activity class, therefore I wanted your opinions regarding
> the name of this method, the current options are [4]:
> * send_notification
> * add_notificat
Hi,
It is compatible with the dbus interface thing. But notifications with an
app name of something like "Chat activity" will get a new icon in the
frame. The function in the toolkit just sends a notification where the name
is the activities id, which shows it under the activity button.
Sam
On Ma
Sorry I hadn't read the proposal in detail.
So if I understand correctly, if a regular X11 application emits a
gi.repository.Notification, it will display correctly in Sugar?
That's great, kudos on the work.
Sebastian
El mié, 26 de mar 2014 a las 10:21 AM, Martin Abente
escribió:
Hello S
Hello Sebastian,
The notification back-end is already a subset of freedesktop notification
definition. That is something we had in Sugar since a long time. We just
added some other missing parts (displaying subject and body).
But, for the front-end, If you look at Gary's design, you will see that
Hi Martin,
What about using this:
https://developer.gnome.org/notification-spec/ ?
I really think we should be moving towards FreeDesktop standards
instead of rolling our own.
Currently it would look like this, or you can add some syntax sugar to
it:
#!/usr/bin/python
from gi.repository im
I vote for "add_notification"
Gonzalo
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Martin Abente <
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> We recently landed a messages notifications feature, based on Gary's
> designs [1]. One of our GCI 2013 hackers, Sam Parkinson, is has sent the
> b
Hello Everyone,
We recently landed a messages notifications feature, based on Gary's
designs [1]. One of our GCI 2013 hackers, Sam Parkinson, is has sent the
bits to enable activities to send notifications too, as in Gary's design.
His work is almost done [2,3,4], but it introduces a new method t
12 matches
Mail list logo
