On 07/05/2010 02:47 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 07/01/2010 08:32 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi folks,
Just wanted to ask the obvious question. Patches to mail list, or
patches to trac?
About acceptance, the current process is in place until its wiki page is
changed:
I was thinking that google groups deals great with two views on the
same discussion (forum-like comments and ml). Could something like
that be done for trac? Would it be a good idea?
On 6 July 2010 09:07, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 07/05/2010 02:47 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On
My personal suggestions follow:
Patches to mail list, or patches to trac?
Use the mailing list to get feedback.
Use Trac to publish histories of work on a theme.
Personally I read mail in a bunch of different places/devices and there's no
way I can currently (and sanely) keep track of all
Hi folks,
Just wanted to ask the obvious question. Patches to mail list, or patches to
trac?
Patches to mail-list seem great for quick random 'easy' feedback from and for
any one who cares to give it, and I really like seeing little code snippets go
past. However it seems vital that with the
4 matches
Mail list logo
