Re: [Sugar-devel] Putting stuff in the control panel vs. the frame

2010-08-03 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Christoph Derndorfer < > christoph.derndor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> looking at some of ParaguayEduca's latest builds I saw that they have >> added some new icons / features to the frame (e.g.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Putting stuff in the control panel vs. the frame

2010-08-03 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Eben Eliason wrote: > I think that the dominant factor in the choice of what to show should be the > frequency with which the information or controls are used. If a setting is > changed frequently by a child within a single "session" it's a good > candidate for a de

Re: [Sugar-devel] Putting stuff in the control panel vs. the frame

2010-08-03 Thread Eben Eliason
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Christoph Derndorfer < christoph.derndor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > looking at some of ParaguayEduca's latest builds I saw that they have added > some new icons / features to the frame (e.g. CPU / memory consumption, > accessibility, touchpad-mode, etc.) >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Putting stuff in the control panel vs. the frame

2010-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:51, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Hi all, > > looking at some of ParaguayEduca's latest builds I saw that they have added > some new icons / features to the frame (e.g. CPU / memory consumption, > accessibility, touchpad-mode, etc.) > > I talked to Bernie about this and w

[Sugar-devel] Putting stuff in the control panel vs. the frame

2010-08-03 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Hi all, looking at some of ParaguayEduca's latest builds I saw that they have added some new icons / features to the frame (e.g. CPU / memory consumption, accessibility, touchpad-mode, etc.) I talked to Bernie about this and we realized that there currently doesn't seem to be a clear consensus on