Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-09-08 Thread James Cameron
Message- > From: qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2015 10:37 a.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > G'day David, > > I've no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-09-08 Thread James Cameron
Inline quoted reply. On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years > old but was a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run > SOAS. It never completes booting, you go through the name, colour, >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-09-08 Thread David Leeming
Leeming Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS The same hardware requirements for the corresponding version of Fedora, since SOAS is based on Fedora. SOAS itself has no hardware requirements beyond what Fedora has. SOAS and Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-09-08 Thread David Leeming
September 2015 1:00 p.m. To: David Leeming Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Inline quoted reply. On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few ye

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-09-08 Thread James Cameron
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Inline quoted reply. > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:46:37PM +1100, David Leeming wrote: > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years > > old but was a $2000 lapto

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread David Leeming
: 'Sugar-dev Devel' Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Hi David, From what you say, you already did a search for your error message. Does this Fedora forum answer cover your issue? http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=301945 I have been working with the script livecd-iso-to-disk

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread David Leeming
-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2015 10:58 a.m. To: Development of live Sugar distributions Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Hi David, I'm the SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread Sam P.
July 2015 7:52 p.m. To: David Leeming Cc: 'Sugar-dev Devel' Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Hi David, From what you say, you already did a search for your error message. Does this Fedora forum answer cover your issue? http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=301945 I have been

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread David Leeming
-Original Message- From: sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Iain Brown Douglas Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2015 7:52 p.m. To: David Leeming Cc: 'Sugar-dev Devel' Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Hi David, From what you say, you already did

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread Peter Robinson
[mailto:sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Iain Brown Douglas Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2015 7:52 p.m. To: David Leeming Cc: 'Sugar-dev Devel' Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Hi David, From what you say, you already did a search for your error message. Does this Fedora forum answer

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
Hi David, From what you say, you already did a search for your error message. Does this Fedora forum answer cover your issue? http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=301945 I have been working with the script livecd-iso-to-disk and it works fine. I am working on SoaS Loader, here is a

[Sugar-devel] SOAS

2015-07-20 Thread David Leeming
Hello, I have familiarity with Sugar since working with OLPC from 2008, but I haven't been active in these communities for some time. I'm just refreshing myself on current status of Sugar with a view to introducing teachers to it in a forthcoming workshop in Vanuatu. We'll be using tablets as

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-21 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:23 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:41 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:10:38PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote: Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut)

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-21 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:41 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:10:38PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote: Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)? Do the two

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-21 Thread Walter Bender
Collaboration is a priority for 108. Hopefully we will be able to find the resources to Stamos the stack. On May 21, 2015 6:21 AM, Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm not 100% sure about in F22, but it doesn't work in F21 either. In fact I've never seen it work (over jabber) for

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-21 Thread Sam P.
Hi, I'm not 100% sure about in F22, but it doesn't work in F21 either. In fact I've never seen it work (over jabber) for the last 2 years or so. From memory, there were some upstream changes that were not simple to adapt to from sugar. Maybe next release! Thanks, Sam On Thu, May 21, 2015 at

[Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
With SOAS Fedora 22 coming to the stage of final release I would like to know if we can expect the collaboative features of Sugar to be functioning. I tried Memorize, Maze and Write with two SOAS and it did not work. Have reported this issue before. Cheers --- T.K. Kang

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:10:38PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote: Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)? Do the two SOAS share a network? Did previous SOAS work okay? Is

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:11:45AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote: Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download SOAS images; but is the Server entry box in the Collaboration section of the Network panel of the My Settings set or is it blank? It has the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
I tested the 2 SOAS-22 via a connection to the schoolserver AP. Collaboration works normally between XOs-1 running 13.2.4. In Adhoc network connection I could not see the other person in neighbourhood view. I think collaboration work on SOAS-17 and below as I alway try to see if the SOAS

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
This keeps coming up. I believe that due to changes in telepathy, collaboration (at least for Jabber) has not worked for the past few Fedora releases. Given collaboration is supposed to be one of the core features of Sugar, this makes it hard to promote. On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:36 AM, James

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP? Only connected to the Schoolserver via the AP without registration. Did you see the person in neighbourhood view while using the AP? Yes they showed up together with any other activities shared by the XO. Could join by the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:10:17AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote: I tested the 2 SOAS-22 via a connection to the schoolserver AP. Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP? In Adhoc network connection I could not see the other person in neighbourhood view.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download SOAS images; but is the Server entry box in the Collaboration section of the Network panel of the My Settings set or is it blank? It has the jabber.sugalabs.org and I have blank it out first for my testing. I registered the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
Thanks Samuel. So there is effort needed to port Sugar to the versions of Telepathy in use in Fedora and whatever other distributions are used. I'm in favour of that. On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:03:38AM -0400, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: This keeps coming up. I believe that due to changes in

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)? Do the two SOAS share a network? Did previous SOAS work okay? Is there a ticket number? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote: Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)? Do the two SOAS share a network? Did previous SOAS work okay? Is there a ticket number? I like the way you fixed the OLPC sugar Ubuntu!

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 5/20/2015 8:10 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/2015 6:52 PM, James Cameron wrote: Are you finding this problem with peer to peer (telepathy salut) or with a jabber server (telepathy gabble)? Do the two SOAS share a network? Did previous SOAS work okay? Is there a ticket number? I like

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:26:41AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote: Is this registered to the schoolserver? Or only connected to the AP? Only connected to the Schoolserver via the AP without registration. Okay, and please bear with me; I don't have the data quota to download SOAS

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
Thanks Samuel. So there is effort needed to port Sugar to the versions of Telepathy in use in Fedora and whatever other distributions are used. I'm in favour of that. + 1 hope a SOaS (sos) call will get it back to its core functionality and uniqueness. Thank you all for the feedback.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
This keeps coming up. I believe that due to changes in telepathy, collaboration (at least for Jabber) has not worked for the past few Fedora releases. Not sure which version but in the past I did have some fun linking up XO-1 and SOAS for varied shared activities. Reliability was good enough at

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:39:35AM +, tkk...@nurturingasia.com wrote: Indeed this will be an issue if we give the release web a new face and people start trying things out (a few perhaps) in initial testing. Actually, no, it won't be an issue, because those people will ignore the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS Fedora 22 Final Release: Collaboration in Activities

2015-05-20 Thread tkkang
So if you do not blank it out, but leave it as it is, and allow it to connect to jabber.sugarlabs.org, everything works fine? Did my last testing with conection to jabber.sugarlabs.org. Not able to get the shared activity to show/display to join and test. So things are really broken :-(

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2015-04-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Software for children learning ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on a Stick, USB-HowTo as an Activity, in Home view.

2015-02-26 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 16:53 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 08:02 -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: ... It is also possible to just run the command: liveusb-creator in root terminal after # dnf install liveusb-creator is run. The new USB-creator will not show the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on a Stick, USB-HowTo as an Activity, in Home view.

2015-02-26 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 02/26/2015 02:28 PM, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 16:53 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 08:02 -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: ... It is also possible to just run the command: liveusb-creator in root terminal after # dnf install liveusb-creator is run.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Fedora-Live-SoaS-x86_64-21-TC4.iso

2014-12-04 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
Using this image: Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21-5.iso2014-12-03 21:05 713M simply dd to a USB stick. I see that background has been improved, thank you. However a timer (waiting) is presented with the cursor, and not all images in ~/Documents seem to be available to load as background, at

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-28 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
I am very sorry, Peter, that I did not realise that you had applied a patch within 75 minutes of being made aware of it. Thank you for that. More than one could expect from the most dedicated maintainer - a pity you did not say though! I mistakenly thought that your reply was, Before my time,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-28 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4) sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar* In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as this is not on a *clean* install. Iain On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think the spec was

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4) sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar* In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as this is not on a *clean* install.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-27 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791 On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. It goes back long before I was the maintainer and was previously working. The question is what does it do, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as deployed in Peru. I was not aware of responsible for the removed functionality nor was I aware of any bugs related to it or performance. Please add it back Sebastian Silva

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no? Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org: I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware it was removed. It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Yes, but that is what this patch do, right? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, no?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Sebastian Silva
So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org: Yes, but that is what this patch do, right?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-25 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Ahh, sorry, wrong Sebastian! Gonzalo On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@somosazucar.org wrote: So ask Sebastian Dzallas why he removed my contribution! Sebastian Silva http://somosazucar.org/ 2014-11-25 7:50 GMT-05:00 Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org: Yes,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 23.11.2014, at 20:25, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:16 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY jean.thi...@modlibre.info wrote: EToys-116 displays « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? »

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-24 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the Speak.activity folder. I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-24 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:28 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the Speak.activity folder.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 12:28 +, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:15

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] EToys-116 - Tests with Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21-TC3

2014-11-24 Thread Peter Robinson
EToys-116 displays « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? » After clicking on this message, the screen is filled by cars and is not usable. That looks weird ... does it work if you run etoys from the Terminal activity? Thank you Bert for your reply, Yes, Etoys

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-24 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 13:10 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: You find it. I don't know why the bot directory should be deleted. I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. I have successfully built Speak (twice in same environment) with a sugar-speak.spec changed as per attached patch. Speak works fine

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-23 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the Speak.activity folder. I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/ I re-installed Speak by importing speak-48.xo with a USB

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-23 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:16 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY jean.thi...@modlibre.info wrote: EToys-116 displays « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? » After clicking on this message, the screen is filled by cars and is not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-22 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 00:52 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: can you uninstall the activity again, and install the activity using the rpm? The rpm should be named sugar-speak I am unfamiliar with the process, and (over-) aware of time constraints. Working on SoaS, in Terminal Activity, I was

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-22 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 22.11.2014, at 15:15, Jean THIERY jean.thi...@modlibre.info wrote: EToys-116 displays « Cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'initsqueak -m'? » After clicking on this message, the screen is filled by cars and is not usable. That looks weird ... does it work if you run etoys from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-21 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ SoaS mailing list s...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas ___ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Testing Sugar Activities Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4

2014-11-21 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
The folder bot/ and its contents were not in the Speak.activity folder. I deleted /usr/share/sugar/activities/Speak.activity/ I re-installed Speak by importing speak-48.xo with a USB stick. Alice is now running complete with brain. Ok, that confirms the .xo is ok, can you uninstall the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS 21 Beta is now available

2014-11-05 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Downloading On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The Sugar on a Stick 21 Beta is now out as part of Fedora 21 Beta https://fedoraproject.org/get-spin-prerelease Details are available here

[Sugar-devel] SoaS 21 Beta is now available

2014-11-04 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, The Sugar on a Stick 21 Beta is now out as part of Fedora 21 Beta https://fedoraproject.org/get-spin-prerelease Details are available here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-November/003238.html Regards, Peter ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Running Fedora 20 with Sugar on a Chromebook?

2014-05-10 Thread Martin Abente
I finally had the time to try this, As a first test I tried a fedora19 SOAS remix [1,2] and, except for the sound, it worked out-of-box. I run it in parallel from a SD card. Runs smoothly. Refs: 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F19/Remixes#Samsung_Exynos_5_Dual_Core_Cortex_A15

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-16 Thread Sam Parkinson
___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ SoaS mailing list s...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-14 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ SoaS mailing list s...@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Running Fedora 20 with Sugar on a Chromebook?

2014-04-12 Thread Sebastian Silva
I have the C720. It's a beauty and really fast. It runs sugar-build on top of Manjaro GNU/Linux (Arch based) quite nicely. The only issue I guess is at boot time the chromebook will warn you that OS verification has been disabled, press something to enable it. If you don't choose to re

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Running Fedora 20 with Sugar on a Chromebook?

2014-04-12 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Hola Sebastian, thanks a lot for sharing your experiences, much appreciated. Did you have to jump through any special hoops to make sugar-build run? Cheers, Christoph On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.orgwrote: I have the C720. It's a beauty and really

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Running Fedora 20 with Sugar on a Chromebook?

2014-04-12 Thread Sebastian Silva
Hallo Christoph, I think sugar-build should work as-is. In order to save diskspace and ram, and because I found it inconvenient, I disabled the fedora chroot (broot). In order to get all dependencies you should install de Sugar packages from the AUR (mantained by cgueret). Currently I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-09 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Tom, Sam, Martin, Ian, David, thanks a lot for all your input, I'll point the German guy to these resources and ask him to report back his findings. Cheers, Christoph On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:26 AM, David Beveridge bevh...@gmail.com wrote: I have a stick here based on Fedora 20. To get to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-08 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Hi David, thanks for the link. Given that this page was last updated back in 2012 I'm wondering whether anyone knows if the instructions are still up-to-date and working? Cheers, Christoph On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:19 AM, David Beveridge bevh...@gmail.com wrote: I would try this method..,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-08 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 4/8/2014 9:39 AM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: Hi David, thanks for the link. Given that this page was last updated back in 2012 I'm wondering whether anyone knows if the instructions are still up-to-date and working? In general this is still valid. Anaconda - the fedora installer has

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
Uff, that is fairly dated! I would install latest Fedora with the Sugar Desktop Group as my first attempt. It won't be OLPC-pretty, it'll expect users to log in with username/password, but other than that it should work. hth, m On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Christoph Derndorfer

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Recommendations for running Sugar on standard hardware (non-XOs)?

2014-04-08 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 20:54 +, Sam Parkinson wrote: Hi, I think we need to make a really simple tutorial and put it on the wiki home page. Just something with the link to the iso and lots of screenshots :) I might have a go on the weekend. Or maybe we could try to make and

[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] [IAEP] how to install sweets-desktop on a HD using an Mint13 Cinnamon DVD (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS)

2014-01-04 Thread Thomas Gilliard
This is update to confirm that this seems to be a viable alternative Sugar-Desktop to use. Mint13 Cinnamon i686 (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) with 0.94 Sweets-Desktop -Installed today 1/4/2014 works as emulator in Mint cinnamon Education/Sugar or booted from DE chooser on login Supported Versions:

[Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 Test Compose 3

2013-11-27 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, For those that are following along and testing the new SoaS release there's a new test compose out. It has a number of fixes in and Write should be back in the build by default. Fedora is now in Freeze locking down for release so we're into bugfix only mode but if we could get a fix soon

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] [Patch] Missing dependencies - sugar

2013-11-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi All: On SoaS ever wonder why you can't view other SoaSs or XOs on

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] [Patch] Missing dependencies - sugar

2013-11-22 Thread Basanta Shrestha
Is this the reason why activities like write and pippy did not open when I did away with gnome on oob configuration file ? -basanta On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Frederick Grose fgr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-22 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I just pushed the bug fixes in sucrose-0.100 branch, and marked the 0.100.2 version. Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, then his Friday 22? Yep Gonzalo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] [Patch] Missing dependencies - sugar

2013-11-21 Thread Frederick Grose
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi All: On SoaS ever wonder why you can't view other SoaSs or XOs on your local lan once you delete My Setting - Network - Server: value? Well

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] [Patch] Missing dependencies - sugar

2013-11-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi All: On SoaS ever wonder why you can't view other SoaSs or XOs on your local lan once you delete My Setting - Network - Server: value? Well for that to work sugar needs to have avahi-tools installed. This really is a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-20 Thread Peter Robinson
woops, That should read perhaps sugar-cp-keyboard can replace sugar-cp-powerd Attached proposed change to sugar's spec file and a merge request[1] for the sugar change. Tested on SoaS-F20-5 liveinst in a VM. Jerry 1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/135 Can we get this in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On Wednesday, 20 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: woops, That should read perhaps sugar-cp-keyboard can replace sugar-cp-powerd Attached proposed change to sugar's spec file and a merge request[1] for the sugar change. Tested on SoaS-F20-5 liveinst in a VM. Jerry 1.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-20 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Yes, confirmed On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, 20 November 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: woops, That should read perhaps sugar-cp-keyboard can replace sugar-cp-powerd Attached proposed change to sugar's spec file and a merge

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present Sugar on a Stick in parallel with the XO :

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
- The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then displays « cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'inisqueak-m' ? » The eToys developers are basically unresponsive, I'm in two minds whether we even bother to ship it because they can't be bothered doing things

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: - The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then displays « cannot find image file: squeak, did you run 'inisqueak-m' ? » The eToys developers are basically unresponsive, I'm in two minds

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Etoys in Sugar was: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: - The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then displays « cannot find image file: squeak, did you run

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] No keyboard choice - Re: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 18:20 -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 18:11 -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 18:49 -0500, Walter Bender wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Walter

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Etoys in Sugar was: SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 19.11.2013, at 17:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: - The eToys activity (version 116) does not start properly then

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Got a link to the commit? https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/commit/da840a455ac4c1464b9ddd8e8efc9ed34d5bc3d0 Also what are your plans for 0.100.x releases? If there's reasonable amount of fixes there now it would be useful to get a point release soon so I can land it before F-20 freeze.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Ok, then his Friday 22? Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Got a link to the commit?

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, then his Friday 22? Yep Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: Got a link to the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 21:53, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 November 2013 21:52, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I made a patches to hide those. I submitted the sugar part for review Argh, sent accidentally... I submitted the sugar part for review

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jean THIERY jean.thi...@modlibre.info wrote: Hello, I would like to test SoaS v10 beta directly on a USB key. I have a G1G1 XO-1 computer but XO computers are not easily available for the public at large. So during my demonstrations I prefer to present Sugar

[Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one of our strongest and best releases to date. Just a few minor issues to report with 0.100 on Fedora 20. Firstly the in About Computer it's still

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-17 Thread Jerry Vonau
Hi Peter, On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one of our strongest and best releases to date. Just a few minor issues to

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi Peter, On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 19:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one of our

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS v10 testing and a few minor issues with 0.100

2013-11-17 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 17 November 2013 20:33, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS v10 beta [1] is out for both x86 and ARM and testing and feedback would be absolutely fabulous. I believe it's one of our strongest and best releases to date. Awesome! Just a few

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >