On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:07, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> I think we are looking at a great probortunity here. We have a project
My mind balks at that word, but I agree with this message wholeheartedly.
> If we are able to learn to make succe
ary 2010 9:41 a.m.
>> To: Bernie Innocenti
>> Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
>> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti
010 9:41 a.m.
> To: Bernie Innocenti
> Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
>
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote
...@codewiz.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 January 2010 9:41 a.m.
To: Bernie Innocenti
Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie
y, 13 January 2010 7:17 a.m.
To: Bernie Innocenti
Cc: carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500,
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Installing an updated kernel on SoaS may be a little hard.
Oops:
bernie: the new kernel might be a better bet also
bernie: from koji for F12
Well, maybe not too hard after all. Try:
sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ker
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:27 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Caroline, I believe you could install it on SoaS by doing:
>
> sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorg-x11-drv-ati
>
> It should drag in a few more testing packages, that's to be expected.
> Good luck!
I got more useful tips
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:16 -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> >> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
> >> boot helper with Blueberry.
> >>
> >> Berni
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
>> boot helper with Blueberry.
>>
>> Bernie looked at this at the GPA and found a bug in Fedora related to
>> vi
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
> boot helper with Blueberry.
>
> Bernie looked at this at the GPA and found a bug in Fedora related to
> video drivers. Bernie, was this bug reported?
I think I may h
m
-Original Message-
From: Wade Brainerd [mailto:wad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 4:05 a.m.
To: David Leeming
Cc: Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
Hi David,
Did you try adding 'selinux=0' to the kernel boot parameters?
Does SoaS Strawberry *not* expect selinux to be disabled?
IOW, is this a difference between Strawberry and Blueberry?
Art Hunkins
- Original Message -
From: "Wade Brainerd"
To: "David Leeming"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-de
2010 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
Tomeu and David,
I experienced exactly the same problem with the Blueberry Boot Helper
CD that Dave has. The message is exactly the same. I reported it at
bugs.sugarlabs.org. I would be surprised if the problem was an
incomplete do
Hi David,
Did you try adding 'selinux=0' to the kernel boot parameters? SoaS
Blueberry expects selinux to be disabled, so it sounds like the image
you're using was created incorrectly.
1. When first booting, press a key when it prompts you to.
2. You should see a 'GNU GRUB' screen. Press the e
> James Simmons
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:12:58 +0100
> > From: Tomeu Vizoso
> > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
> > To: David Leeming
> > Cc: Sugar on a Stick List , Sugar-devel
> >
> > Message-ID:
> ><2428
g list again.
Regards,
Tomeu
> Art Hunkins
>
> - Original Message -
> From: David Leeming
> To: Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:21 AM
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I a
2010 12:21 AM
Subject: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
Hello,
I am trying out SOAS for the first time, for a workshop related to an OLPC
deployment.
Unfortunately I can't get it to run on either of two laptops on which I
tested. I followed the instructions using LiveUSB
from the USB, but
only a couple of the computers I own can do it.
I was able to boot Strawberry using its helper CD, and I can also boot
the Fedora 12 Live CD with no problem.
James Simmons
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:12:58 +0100
> From: Tomeu Vizoso
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2
Hi David,
the most practical way of making sure that your download isn't
corrupted is to verify the checksum:
http://techcityinc.com/2009/02/06/calculate-md5-and-sha1-on-windows/
The SHA-1 checksum of the file should be the one in this file:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/SHA1SUM
Hello,
I am trying out SOAS for the first time, for a workshop related to an OLPC
deployment.
Unfortunately I can't get it to run on either of two laptops on which I
tested. I followed the instructions using LiveUSB Creator, with a previously
downloaded copy of the SOAS-2-Bueberry iso. The
20 matches
Mail list logo
