Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-08-02 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I added a RUN_IN_WINDOW config option. Probably needs some work and untested on ubuntu, but it's a start. You can use the RESOLUTION option to specify dimensions. On 26 July 2012 13:13, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-26 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: - xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- $(XINITDISPLAY) $(LOGFILE) + xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- /usr/bin/Xvnc $(XINITDISPLAY) Can we add this as a make command so we are able to run Sugar in this way? I'm not good a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-26 Thread Frederick Grose
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: - xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- $(XINITDISPLAY) $(LOGFILE) + xinit $(SCRIPTS)/xinitrc -- /usr/bin/Xvnc $(XINITDISPLAY) Can we add

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-16 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Something like this. Connecting to localhost:6000 with vncviewer worked for me then. [dnarvaez@thinkpad master]$ git diff diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index e5e781b..76e4930 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ build-%: $(TYPESCRIPT) $(JHBUILD) buildone $* $(LOGFILE)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-13 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: What's about configuring the new X with a small resolution and access to it through VNC? (I think this is possible but I don't know how to do it :) ) Something like that might work yeah. Do you have some idea about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 11 July 2012 21:53, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I found sugar-build really easy-to-use. I tested it on F16 (32 bits) and F17 (64 bits) without problems (actually I sent a patch that fixes the error that I had on F16). On the other hand, * [root permissions] I think

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X server initially. Though I must day I got to like it now and I wouldn't go back to a window myself, I'm even using it as my main desktop (something I think

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I probably wouldn't claim it's a replacement of sugar-jhbuild, that project is still maintained etc. Maybe alternative? Thanks! On 12 July 2012 00:15, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: * [wiki page] I'm going to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I probably wouldn't claim it's a replacement of sugar-jhbuild, that project is still maintained etc. Maybe alternative? Yes, an alternative is a good alternative :) I've already changed it. -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X server initially. What's about configuring the new X with a small resolution

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 12 July 2012 13:04, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: It's not right now because Xephyr crashes in Ubuntu (upstream bug and they are not patching it). That's the reason I had to go for a full X server

[Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
Hello, I found sugar-build really easy-to-use. I tested it on F16 (32 bits) and F17 (64 bits) without problems (actually I sent a patch that fixes the error that I had on F16). On the other hand, * [root permissions] I think we should add a message to the user letting him know about which

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: * [wiki page] I'm going to create a wiki page that explains how to use sugar-build, just in case: Someone has already done this? I started writing here: * http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/SugarBuild Hope

Re: [Sugar-devel] Some sugar-build comments

2012-07-11 Thread Manuel Kaufmann
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Kaufmann humi...@gmail.com wrote: On the other hand, What's about running sugar-build on a window? Is this possible? -- Kaufmann Manuel Blog: http://humitos.wordpress.com/ Porfolio: http://fotos.mkaufmann.com.ar/ PyAr: http://www.python.com.ar/