Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-10 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 08:17 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we finally figured out that GsmPalette.set_status() was overriding a method with the same name in its superclass. An unfortunate naming clash. These situations suck, any

[Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Daniel_C erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting Daniel_C erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense erikos Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we finally figured out that

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

2010-03-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 20:59, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Daniel_C erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting Daniel_C erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense erikos Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday We had trouble getting the code