Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Alex Perez wrote: > Walter, > > > On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Walter Bender > wrote: > > I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps > failing, as it seems no package

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

Walter, > On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > > I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps > failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone > else experiencing this problem? > That package no

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone else experiencing this problem? -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Sam, I and my fellow mates have been facing the same build issues while setting up a fresh copy of sugar-build. I think we need to look into recent changes(made to Browse) which are failing the Browse-activity while installation. Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Lam, Removing that line means that Browse activity (the browser in sugar) doesn't get installed. Did you experience the error on a fresh install of sugar-build? What OS are you running? If you have sugar installed on that os through the package manager, what version is it? Thanks,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Sugar developers, The issue that Walter brought up had been discussed before. The fix for this issue can be found here http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg42561.html I was thinking of changing the installation instruction on

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hey Walter, it took me a while to figure out what it was, but is should be fixed now (with out having to create that file manually). I just sent the PR with the fix [1]. Martin. [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/pull/35 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Walter Bender

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Yes. I didn't disable broot. I'll test again and try to get you a log file. -walter On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Martin Abente < martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Walter, > > Are you using broot (default)? I only tested with broot disabled and I > didn't get that error... > > Can

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hi Walter, Are you using broot (default)? I only tested with broot disabled and I didn't get that error... Can you paste the log here to see what exactly is asking for that file? Regards, Martin. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > FYI, I finally

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hi, Broot is disabled by default on fedora these days. Did adding the folder fix that? Thanks, Sam On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, 2:24 AM Walter Bender wrote: > Yes. I didn't disable broot. I'll test again and try to get you a log file. > > -walter > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Yes. It is not broot. And yes, adding the dir fixed the problem. On Dec 7, 2015 3:05 PM, "Sam P." wrote: > Hi, > > Broot is disabled by default on fedora these days. > > Did adding the folder fix that? > > Thanks, > Sam > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, 2:24 AM Walter Bender

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

FYI, I finally upgraded to F23 and made a fresh sugar-build. Ran into one problem: /home/walter/sugar-build/build/out/install/etc/gconf was not created, so build failed. Adding the directory by hand and all was well. Also, I managed to break Turtle Blocks in v212. Patch coming ASAP. regards.

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

This is working exactly as predicted, sorry I took so long to try it. I'm seeing an annoying bug, when I copy something, the left frame's width grows somehow and hides the left ~10px of my screen for the rest of the session. Is there a workaround? Otherwise, it's beautiful! Sebastian Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Thanks :-) On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Please check sugar-build/home/dotsugar/default/logs/shell.log That has the error log Sam On Apr 11, 2014 3:06 PM, Puneet Kaur puneet.gk...@gmail.com wrote: Any ideas what can be the possible

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Any ideas what can be the possible reasons behind the following error ? the sugar build is not running because of the following : puneet@controller:~/sugar-build$ ./osbuild run $ sudo broot run osbuild run Type Shift-Alt-Q inside sugar to close. Command failed: sugar-runner Initializing

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Hi, Please check sugar-build/home/dotsugar/default/logs/shell.log That has the error log Sam On Apr 11, 2014 3:06 PM, Puneet Kaur puneet.gk...@gmail.com wrote: Any ideas what can be the possible reasons behind the following error ? the sugar build is not running because of the following :

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

Unfortunately there isn't much I can do about this in sugar-build. I think sugar should use localed to set the language, I don't have time to work on it myself but it should not be too hard (backward compatibility aside, sigh). I opened a ticket about it http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4742 On

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build - Doesn't actually build

Hi, I was using sugar-build and trying to run a build but all I get is a weird error. I have recently done an ./osbuild pull but no fix. [sam@f20 sugar-build]$ ./osbuild run $ sudo broot run osbuild run = Building = * Building sugar Command failed: make -j 4 /bin/sh ./config.status

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build - Doesn't actually build

Weird, try osbuild clean sugar and then run again. On Sunday, 23 March 2014, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was using sugar-build and trying to run a build but all I get is a weird error. I have recently done an ./osbuild pull but no fix. [sam@f20 sugar-build]$

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

i can confirm that smoketest fails if Sugar is set to Spanish. i set it to English and the test passes now. 2014-03-19 15:45 GMT-03:00 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org: attached. thanks, 2014-03-18 20:19 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Can you post the logs please? On

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

hi, i created a fresh dev environment today, and after that ./osbuild check fails with the following output: [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild check $ sudo broot run osbuild check [sudo] password for manuq: = Building = * Building sugar = Check = * Running smoke test Command

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

Can you post the logs please? On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: hi, i created a fresh dev environment today, and after that ./osbuild check fails with the following output: [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild check $ sudo broot run osbuild check

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 04:41, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory ./out/install/etc/gconf/ or it would fail to install Can I see the output? It seems like something we

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of analysis you have been

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

I had to fix this for another bug, I have not tested with use_broot=false but in theory we should be always using the virtualenv python now. On 10 March 2014 01:27, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it doesn't work

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 10/03/14 05:50, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org mailto:sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 9 March 2014 04:07, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Hello, My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora on a chroot was slow enough that I decided to set *use_broot:false* on *prefs.json* with the intention of running the latest sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the culprit, in ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I replaced in line 190 one instance of python for python2.7 and it

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the culprit, in ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

I see.. :/ Gonzalo On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

All Arch Linux users I met usually solve this problem when developing by using virtualenv. 2014-03-09 20:54 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it doesn't work because we are not activating it but just running the python executable in the virtualenv. So osbuild is using the virtualenv python, but the child processes are not. Now if I could remember why we are not activating

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory ./out/install/etc/gconf/ or it would fail to install Can I see the output? It seems like something we should fix. Sure, I reproduced it easy enough. Thanks for the feedback.

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of analysis you have been doing, then it's very useful feedback, because it's likely to find bugs, as we

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Hello, My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora on a chroot was slow enough that I decided to set *use_broot:false* on *prefs.json* with the intention of running the latest sugar natively. I face a few issues: First, /automake/ gave me some issues, it was

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Thanks for the tips :) We should definitely put a link in the docs On Mar 9, 2014 2:07 PM, Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org wrote: Hello, My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora on a chroot was slow enough that I decided to set *use_broot:false* on

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 08/03/14 22:27, Gaurav Parida escribió: So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. Hi, No, i only have Archlinux on my

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org Cc: Hi, I

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

-- From: Sam Parkinson sam.parkins...@gmail.com Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: Sebastian Silva sebast...@fuentelibre.org Cc: Hi, I don't think we should discriminate based on distro. I can't see where it says unsupported

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Upgraded to F20

Hello, I just pushed the upgrade to F20. You should get it next time you pull. Let me know if you find any issue! -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] f20 branch

Note that switching to the f20 branch and osbuild-pulling is supported but not going back to master again. So if you want to be able to go back to f19 use a separate clone. On 18 December 2013 22:56, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I added an f20 branch to sugar-build and

[Sugar-devel] sugar build

English I can't use sugar build, I return error when you ran $./osbuild build Spanish No puedo usar sugar build, me aparece error cuando ejecuto $./osbuild build -- *Cft* ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar build

Que error te aparece? En que distribucion lo estas probando? Gonzalo On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Cristhofer Travieso cristhofer...@gmail.com wrote: English I can't use sugar build, I return error when you ran $./osbuild build Spanish No puedo usar sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Today I tried a fresh install of Fedora 19 with this in the prefs.json file: { use_broot: false } Got this error: [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild build = Building = * Building automake Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

I pushed an untested fix (not on F19 anymore so I can't test here...). Can you try with a clean clone and see if it helps? On 27 September 2013 18:48, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Today I tried a fresh install of Fedora 19 with this in the prefs.json file: { use_broot: false

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Is there something wrong with the current sugar-build? I started with a fresh clone of and started pulling, it stuck here for the past couple of hours. (btw, i do have decent internet speed) suraj@suraj-PC:~/GSOC/sugar-build$ ./osbuild pull = Setup the host build system = * Create the python

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

From another terminal, inside the sugar-build dir tail -f build/logs/broot.log That should give you progess info. On 21 September 2013 13:18, Suraj K S suraj.gilles...@gmail.com wrote: Is there something wrong with the current sugar-build? I started with a fresh clone of and started

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Been stuck at 75% for a really long time now. if i cancel and ./osbuild pull, would it start all over again? On 21 September 2013 17:11, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: From another terminal, inside the sugar-build dir tail -f build/logs/broot.log That should give you progess

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Nevermind, completed finally. On 21 September 2013 17:58, Suraj K S suraj.gilles...@gmail.com wrote: Been stuck at 75% for a really long time now. if i cancel and ./osbuild pull, would it start all over again? On 21 September 2013 17:11, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: From

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Hello, I've just installed my own activity in sugar-build, by the command $python setup.py dev But, though I've restarted Sugar-build, I can't see my own application, even looking at the table view of the activities. And I did not see any trace of my own activity in the logs. Meanwhile, I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Did you run setup.py dev inside an osbuild shell? (Btw I don't develop activities myself so your feedback is very useful) On Saturday, 14 September 2013, laurent bernabe wrote: Hello, I've just installed my own activity in sugar-build, by the command $python setup.py dev But, though I've

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

I don't think, as I started the sugar emulator with $ ./osbuild run rather than running $ ./osbuild shell And from the terminal activity, I enter the installation command for my own activity. 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Did you run setup.py dev inside an osbuild shell? (Btw

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

From terminal is fine, you are inside the chroot. Looks like a bug somewhere, investigating... On 14 September 2013 22:03, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote: I don't think, as I started the sugar emulator with $ ./osbuild run rather than running $ ./osbuild shell And from

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Is it a gtk2 activity? If not, is it using from sugar3.activity import bundlebuilder in the setup.py? On 14 September 2013 22:06, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: From terminal is fine, you are inside the chroot. Looks like a bug somewhere, investigating... On 14 September 2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

no it is a pygame activity built upon sugar olpc games 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Is it a gtk2 activity? If not, is it using from sugar3.activity import bundlebuilder in the setup.py? On 14 September 2013 22:06, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: From terminal is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

pygame aside, does it use sugar-toolkit (import sugar) or sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (import sugar3)? On 14 September 2013 23:38, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote: no it is a pygame activity built upon sugar olpc games 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Is it a gtk2

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

no neither import sugar, nor import sugar3 (and it does not seems to me that I must rely on OLPC Games code for that) : maybe I missed that point. 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com pygame aside, does it use sugar-toolkit (import sugar) or sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (import sugar3)? On 14

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Do you have the code anywhere? At very least the setup.py must be importing sugar or sugar3, unless it implements its own dev command. On 14 September 2013 23:47, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.comwrote: no neither import sugar, nor import sugar3 (and it does not seems to me that I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Yes i can pass you the source code it is in joined to this mail Notice that I downloaded the OLPC games 1.6 and generated a skeleton with it. 2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Do you have the code anywhere? At very least the setup.py must be importing sugar or sugar3, unless it

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Looks like a gtk2 activity from sugar.activity import bundlebuilder I'm not sure how we can fix that, we are not making changes to sugar-toolkit anymore. As a workaround change that line (in setup.py) to from sugar3.activity import bundlebuilder Then call ./setup.py dev and then you can revert

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Thank you very much :) It works now. So, when I generate a skeleton from OLPC Games, I must edit the setup.py and add a bundle_id. Little modifications, but not I am aware about them. Regards 2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com Looks like a gtk2 activity from sugar.activity import

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build is blocking at broot setup (Ubuntu 13.04)

Hello everyone, I cloned the sugar build repository. But when launching ./osbuild pull, the program blocks : this is my output $ ./osbuild pull = Setup the host build system = * Create the python virtualenv * Install python packages * Pull latest

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build is blocking at broot setup (Ubuntu 13.04)

At that point it's doing a pretty big download, should add some feedback. Perhaps you just need to be patient if you have a slow connection. On Friday, 13 September 2013, laurent bernabe wrote: Hello everyone, I cloned the sugar build repository. But when launching ./osbuild pull, the

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

Hello, I have set up sugar build on my computer, and developped a small pygame test program (with olpc game wrapper). But I am failing to install it in dev mode. Indeed, from the terminal activity, I don't manage to access my project folder. (I noticed that the terminal path starts with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

I want to install in developpement mode. So I would like, from the sugar terminal, to go into my project directory, and call ./setup.py dev. But I can't access to my project folder. 2013/9/13 Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org What means to install it in dev mode ? Are you using ./setup.py

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

What means to install it in dev mode ? Are you using ./setup.py dev? There are a error? Gonzalo On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:20 PM, laurent bernabe laurent.bern...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have set up sugar build on my computer, and developped a small pygame test program (with olpc game

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

On 31 August 2013 17:53, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19. I want to avoid creating a F19 chroot inside a F19 install. prefs.json is: {use_broot: false, use_chroot: false} Only use_broot is necessary, use_chroot was a

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

I fixed another bug in the build without chroot, to get the fix you will need git pull ./osbuild pull On 2 September 2013 12:33, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 31 August 2013 17:53, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Try to create that directory manually mkdir -p /home/dsd/projects/sugar-build/build/out/install/etc/ The code should do it of course, I will fix it later tonight or tomorrow. On Saturday, 31 August 2013, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19.

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Hi, Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19. I want to avoid creating a F19 chroot inside a F19 install. prefs.json is: {use_broot: false, use_chroot: false} ./osbuild clean git clean -fdx git pull ./osbuild shell Last command fails with: Traceback (most recent call

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Disk usage

Hi. I'm trying to build sugar-build but I have one problem, the disk space.. I start with 2.5GB [My computer has 8gb.. - 6.4 of system and others for swap] - Command: ./osbuild pull (Looking few directories..) /var/lib/broot -- 1,7G broot/ Now I has ~1GB without command build The really

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Disk usage

It might be possible to reduce the required space by using a compressed file system for the chroot (btrfs?). I don't have time to work on it but, assuming reasonably recent distributions supports the file system, I would take a patch. It should not be a lot of work. On Monday, 12 August 2013,

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] chroot branch landed

Hello, I just merged the chroot branch. If you updated sugar-build when I suggested it with an email to this list, you will not automatically be upgraded to it (which is unlikely to work anyway). If you missed that email, you are still in time, just git pull git checkout 45e044be8 I'd suggest

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Please pull now

Hello, I'm planning to land the chroot branch by the end of the week. If you are on master, to avoid being automatically upgraded to it, please pull the latest sugar-build now. You can just ./osbuild pull -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

Hi, there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. - The master branch supports the same distributions it has been supporting for the last few months, as documented on developer.sugarlabs.org. - The chroot branch supports

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. - The master branch supports the same distributions it has been supporting for the last few

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

On Monday, 22 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. - The master branch supports the same

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

This is really weird, sugar-build from the chroot branch uses the chroot branch of osbuild https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/blob/chroot/osbuild#L202 Which doesn't have --home-dir anymore https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/chroot/osbuild/run.py Maybe try to rm -rf

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: This is really weird, sugar-build from the chroot branch uses the chroot branch of osbuild https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/blob/chroot/osbuild#L202 Which doesn't have --home-dir anymore

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

If I have a file prefs.json with {use_broot: false} as suggested to not use chroot, get the following error: [gonzalo@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild build Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/gonzalo/sugar-build-multiselection/build/commands/build, line 4, in module

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

It seems like you are running a mix of master and chroot branch code. Did you start from a clean clone or run osbuild clean before switching branch? (Hope I remembered to suggest that in my emails). I'm trying to figure out how to make the upgrade automatic or at least more obvious, but it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

I'm probably going to delay landing this for a week or two. I'm traveling so I wouldn't be around much to deal with the issues that will likely be discovered. Though please keep testing! On Wednesday, 10 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Hello, I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: It seems like you are running a mix of master and chroot branch code. Did you start from a clean clone or run osbuild clean before switching branch? (Hope I remembered to suggest that in my emails). I'm trying to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

2013/7/15 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: Should be fixed now. Can you give it another try? I get a traceback and don't see any logs. Traceback (most recent call last): File ./osbuild, line 467, in module main() File ./osbuild, line 452, in main setup(options.command) File

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Now it seems to be working :D It started pulling automake, so it's time to wait and see if it works. 2013/7/16 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: This is _not_ on a fresh clone I guess? Could you try with a fresh clone? I made pretty big changes and it's pretty hard now to tell you exactly

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Should be fixed now. Can you give it another try? On 14 July 2013 03:05, S. Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote: 2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better? Both when pulling the current repository and cloning it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Some kind of problem with urlgrabber, seeing the same on debian in buildbot. We should probably just use urllib, I will let you know when it's fixed. Thanks! On Sunday, 14 July 2013, S. Daniel Francis wrote: 2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com javascript:;: I pushed that change. Can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Hi Daniel, thanks for testing! Which version of open suse are you using? On 13 July 2013 07:35, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:22:43 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote: This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode for another few

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

I suspect this is because rpm is configured or built differently on suse. Instead of trying to ensure we have the right configuration on each distro, I think it's easier to use prebuilt chroots. That will reduce the amount of code which we need to ensure works cross distro. The dependencies

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better? Both when pulling the current repository and cloning it again, I'm getting an error: Traceback (most recent call last): File ./osbuild, line 462, in module main() File

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode for another few days. Please switch to the chroot branch as soon as you can, when we land you will just need to switch to master, but that won't trigger a rebuild or anything. ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:22:43 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote: This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode for another few days. Please switch to the chroot branch as soon as you can, when we land you will just need to switch to master, but that won't trigger a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

This is now implemented [dnarvaez@dnarvaez sugar-build]$ cat prefs.json {use_broot: false} On 10 July 2013 15:55, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, yup, I'm planning to keep a non chrooted build that you can enable in prejs.json. Automatic dependencies installation will

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Sorry, what is the procedure to enable/disable the use of chroot? Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: This is now implemented [dnarvaez@dnarvaez sugar-build]$ cat prefs.json {use_broot: false} On 10 July 2013 15:55, Daniel Narvaez

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

See the prefs.json I pasted, just add that property to your (or create one like that if you don't have a prefs.json). On Thursday, 11 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Sorry, what is the procedure to enable/disable the use of chroot? Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Narvaez

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Hello, I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master. Though, since it's a major change, I'm trying to avoid disruption as much as possible. As a first step, I'm switch the build infrastructure to use that branch. I encourage people to switch to the branch too when they have a chance

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Just did a fresh build on F19. Seems to work. Although there is some strange behavior with webkit I am investigating. -walter On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master. Though, since it's a major

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Daniel, I am worried about two points: * How this change impact regarding to disk space/bandwidth usage? * If the different build bots will use a chroot to a single (F19) distro, will this change mask problems regarding to compatibility issues? Regards Gonzalo On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:10

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on master. Though, since it's a major change, I'm trying to avoid disruption as much as possible. As a first step, I'm switch the build infrastructure to use that branch. I

  1   2   3   4   >