what a fun time we've had, eh? ;-)
i agree with sebastian on a monolithic sugar rpm; provided there is an
easy way to disable components not required by a user. i dislike
having many packages for what is, on the face of it, a single desktop
solution.
i agree with jerry that making such a signif
Just a few points:
* If anybody want install all the control-panel sections, can install
sugar-cp-all.
* You can install all sugar with "yum install @sugar-desktop sugar-runner"
[1]
If there are some dependency not working, is a bug, and we can try to solve
it.
As a example, I filled this ticket
On 09/02/2014 01:49 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
Hi Jerry,
As I've not had the pleasure of working with you directly and I have
never been an OLPC associate, whatever that is, and, to my knowledge,
there is no such thing as a Sugar Labs associate, therefore I don't
feel offended by your (perce
Hi Jerry,
As I've not had the pleasure of working with you directly and I have
never been an OLPC associate, whatever that is, and, to my knowledge,
there is no such thing as a Sugar Labs associate, therefore I don't
feel offended by your (perceived) aggressive tone, so I hope it was not
dire
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:47 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> G'day German,
>
> Perhaps Gonzalo was asking, in your two builds, which version of the
> sugar- package was chosen by olpc-os-builder?
>
> sudo rpm -q sugar
>
> Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
> sugar-cp-bac
>
> This take it or leave it attitude that is displayed here is the reason
> myself and Dextrose(Activity Central) came into being part of the ecosystem
> in the first place, for the needs of the deployment. We listened to what
> the deployment wanted to do and worked towards that goal.
>
> I guess
> On September 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM Sebastian Silva
> wrote:
>
>
> I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure
> olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think "sugar"
> packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if
> any deployment wants to chop
I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure
olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think "sugar"
packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if
any deployment wants to chop and censor functionality, then it should
be their problem, not the ot
>
>
> Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
> sugar-cp-background should be declared by the sugar package spec file.
> I disagree. I think it should be a decision by deployment team.
>
>
Yes. That is the reason I asked.
Anyway, no problem from my part if the rpm is added by d
G'day German,
Perhaps Gonzalo was asking, in your two builds, which version of the
sugar- package was chosen by olpc-os-builder?
sudo rpm -q sugar
Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
sugar-cp-background should be declared by the sugar package spec file.
I disagree.
I have 2 scenarios:
Sugar 0.100
XO
using
customized 13.2.0 version, using au1b-updates repo, sugar-cp-background
installed was sugar-cp-background-0.100.1.22.olpcau.noarch
Sugar 0.102
XO using customized version from olpc-os-builder using SL102 branch,
sugar-cp-background installed w
Hmm, what sugar rpm are you using, should install sugar-cp-background as a
dependency.
Gonzalo
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:33 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT <
gr...@fundacionzt.org> wrote:
> There was no background section at Control Panel, after install
> sugar-cp-background it is present, but t
After install gnome-backgrounds i have images to set as background.
I need to create an XO image using olpc-os-builder to install on XO 1.75,
for that reason i can't use the VirtualBox image.
Thanks for your help.
2014-08-30 9:42 GMT-06:00 Thomas C. Gilliard :
>
> On 08/30/2014 08:33 AM, German
On 08/30/2014 08:33 AM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT wrote:
There was no background section at Control Panel, after install
sugar-cp-background it is present, but there is no image to set as
background.
http://imgur.com/JW0goSa
You may need a xxx.png on a USB stick to import to journal?
It is i
There was no background section at Control Panel, after install
sugar-cp-background it is present, but there is no image to set as
background.
http://imgur.com/JW0goSa
2014-08-29 19:17 GMT-06:00 Jerry Vonau :
> Would that not require the sugar-cp-background rpm to installed in the
> image? Don't
Would that not require the sugar-cp-background rpm to installed in the
image? Don't see it listed in OOB[1].
1.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/olpc-os-builder/blob/SL102/modules/sugar/kspkglist.50.sugar.inc
Jerry
> On August 29, 2014 at 7:48 PM Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
>
>
> Can you see the backgr
Can you see the background section in the control panel?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:24 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT <
gr...@fundacionzt.org> wrote:
> Also, i forget to mention, how can i try the background features?
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view
>
>
> 2014
Try this importable VirtualBox .ova where the background can be changed.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_21#F21_release_candidate_Sugar_0.102_v11
sugar 0.102
On 08/29/2014 03:24 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT wrote:
Also, i forget to mention, how can i try the background features?
http://wiki
Also, i forget to mention, how can i try the background features?
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view
2014-08-29 14:23 GMT-06:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
> Walter,
> are these activities updated to use GSettings?
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Walter B
I'll help you with the gsettings bits.
-walter
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi ..
>
> No I didn't updated that because I dont know how :P
>
> If anyone can help, I will do :)
> I see that maybe is a problem with gconf
>
> Ignacio Rodríguez
> +598 91 686 835
> nacho
Hi ..
No I didn't updated that because I dont know how :P
If anyone can help, I will do :)
I see that maybe is a problem with gconf
Ignacio Rodríguez
+598 91 686 835
nachoe...@gmail.com
2014-08-29 17:31 GMT-03:00 German Ruiz - FundacionZT
:
>
> 2014-08-29 14:21 GMT-06:00 Walter Bender :
>
>
2014-08-29 14:21 GMT-06:00 Walter Bender :
> Re ChangeIcon, try copying some svg files into ~/.icon from the
> Terminal program.
>
> There are some svg files present at /home/olpc/.icon
s, for example:
-computer-xo-default.svg
-joke.svg
-silence.svg
-computer-xo.svg
-energy_happy.svg
There is a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Walter,
> are these activities updated to use GSettings?
good question. no se
@ Ignacio?
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>>
>> Re ChangeIcon, try copying some svg files into ~/.icon from the
>> Te
Walter,
are these activities updated to use GSettings?
Gonzalo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> Re ChangeIcon, try copying some svg files into ~/.icon from the
> Terminal program.
>
> There is an activity for setting up multiple home views:
>
> [4] http://activities.sug
Re ChangeIcon, try copying some svg files into ~/.icon from the
Terminal program.
There is an activity for setting up multiple home views:
[4] http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4722
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:59 PM, German Ruiz - FundacionZT
wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to crea
Hello
I'm trying to create a custo
mized image based on Sugar 0.102,
with features of Sugar 0.100
[0][1]
This is what i'm using:
- OS Builder forked from https://github.com/sugarlabs/olpc-os-builder,
branch SL102
- No gnome, just sugar
But i have some problems, for example:
-> Icon Change
26 matches
Mail list logo
