Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2013-09-16

2013-09-19 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:39:16PM -0700, Anish Mangal wrote: > There was a time when in our community we had energetic discussions > over *just* transitioning from GPL v2 to v3. Ah, those were the days. http://theconversation.com/a-new-view-of-an-old-emotion-or-how-science-is-saving-nostalgia-16

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2013-09-16

2013-09-19 Thread Anish Mangal
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:18 PM, David Farning wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Walter Bender > wrote: > > == Sugar Digest == > > > > 1. The 'New York Times' had an article about the tablet invasion, No > > Child Left Untableted, in this Sunday's magazine section [1]. The > > author of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2013-09-16

2013-09-17 Thread David Farning
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > == Sugar Digest == > > 1. The 'New York Times' had an article about the tablet invasion, No > Child Left Untableted, in this Sunday's magazine section [1]. The > author of the article was a skeptical of the approach taken by the > Murdoch-ba

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2013-09-16

2013-09-16 Thread Walter Bender
== Sugar Digest == 1. The 'New York Times' had an article about the tablet invasion, No Child Left Untableted, in this Sunday's magazine section [1]. The author of the article was a skeptical of the approach taken by the Murdoch-backed Amplify tablet. I've not seen the Amplify tablet yet, so it is