Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Alex Perez wrote: > Walter, > > > On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Walter Bender > wrote: > > I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps > failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone > else experiencing this

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

Walter, > On Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > > I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps > failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone > else experiencing this problem? > That package no longer exists in Fedora 25.

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on f25

I have a clean F25 where I am trying to build sugar. osbuild pull keeps failing, as it seems no package xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse is available. Anyone else experiencing this problem? -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org __

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Sam, I and my fellow mates have been facing the same build issues while setting up a fresh copy of sugar-build. I think we need to look into recent changes(made to Browse) which are failing the Browse-activity while installation. Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Lam, Removing that line means that Browse activity (the browser in sugar) doesn't get installed. Did you experience the error on a fresh install of sugar-build? What OS are you running? If you have sugar installed on that os through the package manager, what version is it? Thanks, Sam

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build

Hi Sugar developers, The issue that Walter brought up had been discussed before. The fix for this issue can be found here http://www.mail-archive.com/sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg42561.html I was thinking of changing the installation instruction on developer.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hey Walter, it took me a while to figure out what it was, but is should be fixed now (with out having to create that file manually). I just sent the PR with the fix [1]. Martin. [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/pull/35 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Yes.

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Yes. It is not broot. And yes, adding the dir fixed the problem. On Dec 7, 2015 3:05 PM, "Sam P." wrote: > Hi, > > Broot is disabled by default on fedora these days. > > Did adding the folder fix that? > > Thanks, > Sam > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, 2:24 AM Walter Bender > wrote: > >> Yes. I didn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hi, Broot is disabled by default on fedora these days. Did adding the folder fix that? Thanks, Sam On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, 2:24 AM Walter Bender wrote: > Yes. I didn't disable broot. I'll test again and try to get you a log file. > > -walter > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Martin Abente < >

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Yes. I didn't disable broot. I'll test again and try to get you a log file. -walter On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Martin Abente < martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Walter, > > Are you using broot (default)? I only tested with broot disabled and I > didn't get that error... > > Can y

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

Hi Walter, Are you using broot (default)? I only tested with broot disabled and I didn't get that error... Can you paste the log here to see what exactly is asking for that file? Regards, Martin. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Walter Bender wrote: > FYI, I finally upgraded to F23 and made a

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on F23

FYI, I finally upgraded to F23 and made a fresh sugar-build. Ran into one problem: /home/walter/sugar-build/build/out/install/etc/gconf was not created, so build failed. Adding the directory by hand and all was well. Also, I managed to break Turtle Blocks in v212. Patch coming ASAP. regards. -w

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

This is working exactly as predicted, sorry I took so long to try it. I'm seeing an annoying bug, when I copy something, the left frame's width grows somehow and hides the left ~10px of my screen for the rest of the session. Is there a workaround? Otherwise, it's beautiful! Sebastian Sebastian

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Thanks :-) On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Hi, > > Please check sugar-build/home/dotsugar/default/logs/shell.log > That has the error log > > Sam > On Apr 11, 2014 3:06 PM, "Puneet Kaur" wrote: > >> Any ideas what can be the possible reasons behind the following error ?

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Hi, Please check sugar-build/home/dotsugar/default/logs/shell.log That has the error log Sam On Apr 11, 2014 3:06 PM, "Puneet Kaur" wrote: > Any ideas what can be the possible reasons behind the following error ? > the sugar build is not running because of the following : > > puneet@controller:

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build : command run failed to run

Any ideas what can be the possible reasons behind the following error ? the sugar build is not running because of the following : puneet@controller:~/sugar-build$ ./osbuild run $ sudo broot run osbuild run Type Shift-Alt-Q inside sugar to close. Command failed: sugar-runner Initializing built-

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

Unfortunately there isn't much I can do about this in sugar-build. I think sugar should use localed to set the language, I don't have time to work on it myself but it should not be too hard (backward compatibility aside, sigh). I opened a ticket about it http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4742 On

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build - Doesn't actually build

Weird, try "osbuild clean sugar" and then run again. On Sunday, 23 March 2014, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Hi, > > I was using sugar-build and trying to run a build but all I get is a weird > error. I have recently done an ./osbuild pull but no fix. > > [sam@f20 sugar-build]$ ./osbuild run > > $ sudo

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build - Doesn't actually build

Hi, I was using sugar-build and trying to run a build but all I get is a weird error. I have recently done an ./osbuild pull but no fix. [sam@f20 sugar-build]$ ./osbuild run $ sudo broot run osbuild run = Building = * Building sugar Command failed: make -j 4 /bin/sh ./config.status ./config

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

i can confirm that smoketest fails if Sugar is set to Spanish. i set it to English and the test passes now. 2014-03-19 15:45 GMT-03:00 Manuel Quiñones : > attached. > > thanks, > > 2014-03-18 20:19 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez : >> Can you post the logs please? >> >> >> On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, Man

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

Can you post the logs please? On Tuesday, 18 March 2014, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > hi, > > i created a fresh dev environment today, and after that ./osbuild > check fails with the following output: > > > [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild check > > $ sudo broot run osbuild check > [sudo] pa

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build, can't perform check

hi, i created a fresh dev environment today, and after that ./osbuild check fails with the following output: [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild check $ sudo broot run osbuild check [sudo] password for manuq: = Building = * Building sugar = Check = * Running smoke test Command failed:

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Try to create a file like this /usr/share/xsessions/sugar.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Sugar GenericName=Sugar Exec=/path/to/sugar-build/osbuild run sugar Type=Application Untested but in theory it should work... On 10 March 2014 15:26, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 10/03/14

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 10/03/14 05:50, Daniel Narvaez escribió: On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva > wrote: El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the la

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

I had to fix this for another bug, I have not tested with use_broot=false but in theory we should be always using the virtualenv python now. On 10 March 2014 01:27, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it > doesn't work because we are not act

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 05:10, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: > >> It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if >> anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of >> analysis you have been doing, then it's very

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 04:41, Sebastian Silva wrote: > > El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: > > Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory >> "./out/install/etc/gconf/" or it would fail to install >> > > Can I see the output? It seems like something we should fix. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: It's unsupported because it's unlikely to work out-of-the-box. But if anyone wants to try it on the latest version of a distro and do the kind of analysis you have been doing, then it's very useful feedback, because it's likely to find bugs, as we ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 09/03/14 06:32, Daniel Narvaez escribió: Also, when building sugar, I had to manually create the directory "./out/install/etc/gconf/" or it would fail to install Can I see the output? It seems like something we should fix. Sure, I reproduced it easy enough. Thanks for the feedback.

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Oh interesting! osbuild is actually using a virtualenv. I suspect it doesn't work because we are not activating it but just running the python executable in the virtualenv. So osbuild is using the virtualenv python, but the child processes are not. Now if I could remember why we are not activating

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

All Arch Linux users I met usually solve this problem when developing by using virtualenv. 2014-03-09 20:54 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez : > On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >> On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persi

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

I see.. :/ Gonzalo On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> >>> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use python3.3, my system's default, ins

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 00:46, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> >>> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use >>> python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the >>> culprit, in >>> ./out/sandbox/install/lib/p

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 10 March 2014 00:07, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use >> python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the >> culprit, in >> ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I >> replaced in

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

> > > Then issues ocurred with gwebsockets. It persistently tried to use > python3.3, my system's default, instead of python2.7. Finally I found the > culprit, in > ./out/sandbox/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/osbuild/build.py I > replaced in line 190 one instance of "python" for "python2.7" a

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

On 9 March 2014 04:07, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Hello, > My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora > on a chroot was slow enough > that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with the > intention of running the latest sugar natively. > > I face a few

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

n for sending it 3 times. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Sam Parkinson" > Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot > To: "Sebastian Silva" > Cc: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't th

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

: Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Sam Parkinson" <mailto:sam.parkins...@gmail.com>> Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: "Sebastian Silva"

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Sam Parkinson" Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot To: "Sebastian Silva" Cc: > Hi, > > I don't thi

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

El 08/03/14 22:27, Gaurav Parida escribió: So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. Hi, No, i only have Archlinux on my m

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. +1 for adding it to the docs. On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Thanks for the tips :) We sh

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Thanks for the tips :) We should definitely put a link in the docs On Mar 9, 2014 2:07 PM, "Sebastian Silva" wrote: > Hello, > My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora > on a chroot was slow enough > that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot

Hello, My machine is somewhat constrained in ram and diskspace so running Fedora on a chroot was slow enough that I decided to set *"use_broot":false* on *prefs.json* with the intention of running the latest sugar natively. I face a few issues: First, /automake/ gave me some issues, it was re

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Upgraded to F20

Hello, I just pushed the upgrade to F20. You should get it next time you pull. Let me know if you find any issue! -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] f20 branch

Note that switching to the f20 branch and osbuild-pulling is supported but not going back to master again. So if you want to be able to go back to f19 use a separate clone. On 18 December 2013 22:56, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > I added an f20 branch to sugar-build and buildbot which uses

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] f20 branch

Hello, I added an f20 branch to sugar-build and buildbot which uses pretty much the same code as master but builds it on the top of a Fedora 20 chroot. This will probably be merged after GCI, but testing would be appreciated. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar build

Que error te aparece? En que distribucion lo estas probando? Gonzalo On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Cristhofer Travieso < cristhofer...@gmail.com> wrote: > English > > I can't use sugar build, > I return error when you ran $./osbuild build > > > Spanish > > No puedo

[Sugar-devel] sugar build

English I can't use sugar build, I return error when you ran $./osbuild build Spanish No puedo usar sugar build, me aparece error cuando ejecuto $./osbuild build -- *Cft* ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarl

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

2013/9/27 Daniel Narvaez : > I pushed an untested fix (not on F19 anymore so I can't test here...). Can > you try with a clean clone and see if it helps? The build of automake passed, thanks for your continuous support! -- .. manuq .. ___ Sugar-devel m

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

I pushed an untested fix (not on F19 anymore so I can't test here...). Can you try with a clean clone and see if it helps? On 27 September 2013 18:48, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > Today I tried a fresh install of Fedora 19 with this in the prefs.json > file: > > { > "use_broot": false > } > > G

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Today I tried a fresh install of Fedora 19 with this in the prefs.json file: { "use_broot": false } Got this error: [manuq@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild build = Building = * Building automake Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/manuq/prog/sugar-build/build/commands/broot/b

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Nevermind, completed finally. On 21 September 2013 17:58, Suraj K S wrote: > Been stuck at 75% for a really long time now. > if i cancel and ./osbuild pull, would it start all over again? > > > On 21 September 2013 17:11, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> From another terminal, inside the sugar-build

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Been stuck at 75% for a really long time now. if i cancel and ./osbuild pull, would it start all over again? On 21 September 2013 17:11, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > From another terminal, inside the sugar-build dir > > tail -f build/logs/broot.log > > That should give you progess info. > > > On 21

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build

>From another terminal, inside the sugar-build dir tail -f build/logs/broot.log That should give you progess info. On 21 September 2013 13:18, Suraj K S wrote: > Is there something wrong with the current sugar-build? > I started with a fresh clone of and started pulling, it stuck here for the

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build

Is there something wrong with the current sugar-build? I started with a fresh clone of and started pulling, it stuck here for the past couple of hours. (btw, i do have decent internet speed) suraj@suraj-PC:~/GSOC/sugar-build$ ./osbuild pull = Setup the host build system = * Create the python vir

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Thank you very much :) It works now. So, when I generate a skeleton from OLPC Games, I must edit the setup.py and add a bundle_id. Little modifications, but not I am aware about them. Regards 2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez > Looks like a gtk2 activity > > from sugar.activity import bundlebuilder >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Looks like a gtk2 activity from sugar.activity import bundlebuilder I'm not sure how we can fix that, we are not making changes to sugar-toolkit anymore. As a workaround change that line (in setup.py) to from sugar3.activity import bundlebuilder Then call "./setup.py dev" and then you can rever

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Yes i can pass you the source code it is in joined to this mail Notice that I downloaded the OLPC games 1.6 and generated a skeleton with it. 2013/9/15 Daniel Narvaez > Do you have the code anywhere? > > At very least the setup.py must be importing sugar or sugar3, unless it > implements its o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Do you have the code anywhere? At very least the setup.py must be importing sugar or sugar3, unless it implements its own dev command. On 14 September 2013 23:47, laurent bernabe wrote: > no neither import sugar, nor import sugar3 (and it does not seems to me > that I must rely on OLPC Games co

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

no neither import sugar, nor import sugar3 (and it does not seems to me that I must rely on OLPC Games code for that) : maybe I missed that point. 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez > pygame aside, does it use sugar-toolkit (import sugar) or > sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (import sugar3)? > > On 14 September 2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

pygame aside, does it use sugar-toolkit (import sugar) or sugar-toolkit-gtk3 (import sugar3)? On 14 September 2013 23:38, laurent bernabe wrote: > no it is a pygame activity built upon sugar olpc games > > > 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez > >> Is it a gtk2 activity? If not, is it using "from sugar3.ac

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

no it is a pygame activity built upon sugar olpc games 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez > Is it a gtk2 activity? If not, is it using "from sugar3.activity import > bundlebuilder" in the setup.py? > > > On 14 September 2013 22:06, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> From terminal is fine, you are inside the ch

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Is it a gtk2 activity? If not, is it using "from sugar3.activity import bundlebuilder" in the setup.py? On 14 September 2013 22:06, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > From terminal is fine, you are inside the chroot. Looks like a bug > somewhere, investigating... > > > On 14 September 2013 22:03, laurent

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

>From terminal is fine, you are inside the chroot. Looks like a bug somewhere, investigating... On 14 September 2013 22:03, laurent bernabe wrote: > I don't think, as I started the sugar emulator with > $> ./osbuild run > > rather than running $> ./osbuild shell > > And from the terminal activi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

I don't think, as I started the sugar emulator with $> ./osbuild run rather than running $> ./osbuild shell And from the terminal activity, I enter the installation command for my own activity. 2013/9/14 Daniel Narvaez > Did you run setup.py dev inside an osbuild shell? (Btw I don't develop >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Did you run setup.py dev inside an osbuild shell? (Btw I don't develop activities myself so your feedback is very useful) On Saturday, 14 September 2013, laurent bernabe wrote: > Hello, > > I've just installed my own activity in sugar-build, by the command > $>python setup.py dev > > But, though

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-build : can't see my own activity

Hello, I've just installed my own activity in sugar-build, by the command $>python setup.py dev But, though I've restarted Sugar-build, I can't see my own application, even looking at the table view of the activities. And I did not see any trace of my own activity in the logs. Meanwhile, I launc

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

What means "to install it in dev mode" ? Are you using "./setup.py dev"? There are a error? Gonzalo On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:20 PM, laurent bernabe wrote: > Hello, > > I have set up sugar build on my computer, and developped a small pygame test > program (with olpc game wrapper). But I am fai

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

I want to install in developpement mode. So I would like, from the sugar terminal, to go into my project directory, and call ./setup.py dev. But I can't access to my project folder. 2013/9/13 Gonzalo Odiard > What means "to install it in dev mode" ? > > Are you using "./setup.py dev"? > > The

[Sugar-devel] Sugar-Build : installing a custom activity in dev mode

Hello, I have set up sugar build on my computer, and developped a small pygame test program (with olpc game wrapper). But I am failing to install it in dev mode. Indeed, from the terminal activity, I don't manage to access my project folder. (I noticed that the terminal path starts with /home/bro

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build is blocking at broot setup (Ubuntu 13.04)

At that point it's doing a pretty big download, should add some feedback. Perhaps you just need to be patient if you have a slow connection. On Friday, 13 September 2013, laurent bernabe wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I cloned the sugar build repository. But when launching ./osbuild pull, > the pro

[Sugar-devel] Sugar build is blocking at broot setup (Ubuntu 13.04)

Hello everyone, I cloned the sugar build repository. But when launching ./osbuild pull, the program blocks : this is my output $ ./osbuild pull = Setup the host build system = * Create the python virtualenv * Install python packages * Pull latest sugar-b

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

I fixed another bug in the build without chroot, to get the fix you will need git pull ./osbuild pull On 2 September 2013 12:33, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 31 August 2013 17:53, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19. I want >> to avo

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

On 31 August 2013 17:53, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19. I want > to avoid creating a F19 chroot inside a F19 install. > > prefs.json is: > {"use_broot": false, "use_chroot": false} > > Only use_broot is necessary, use_chroot was a typ

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Try to create that directory manually mkdir -p /home/dsd/projects/sugar-build/build/out/install/etc/ The code should do it of course, I will fix it later tonight or tomorrow. On Saturday, 31 August 2013, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F1

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build won't start

Hi, Trying to use sugar-build for the first time in a while on F19. I want to avoid creating a F19 chroot inside a F19 install. prefs.json is: {"use_broot": false, "use_chroot": false} ./osbuild clean git clean -fdx git pull ./osbuild shell Last command fails with: Traceback (most recent call

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] chroot branch landed

Working like a charm in Ubuntu 13.04. Congrats! 2013/7/31 Daniel Narvaez : > Hello, > > I just merged the chroot branch. > > If you updated sugar-build when I suggested it with an email to this list, > you will not automatically be upgraded to it (which is unlikely to work > anyway). If you misse

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Disk usage

It might be possible to reduce the required space by using a compressed file system for the chroot (btrfs?). I don't have time to work on it but, assuming reasonably recent distributions supports the file system, I would take a patch. It should not be a lot of work. On Monday, 12 August 2013, Ign

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Disk usage

Edit: 1.9GB is needed... (Sugar-emulator < 100mb) http://sugarlabs.org/~ignacio/Sugar-Build.png 2013/8/12 Ignacio - SugarLabs > Hi. > > I'm trying to build "sugar-build" but I have one problem, the disk space.. > I start with 2.5GB [My computer has 8gb.. -> 6.4 of system and others for > swap]

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Disk usage

Hi. I'm trying to build "sugar-build" but I have one problem, the disk space.. I start with 2.5GB [My computer has 8gb.. -> 6.4 of system and others for swap] -> Command: ./osbuild pull (Looking few directories..) /var/lib/broot --> 1,7G broot/ Now I has ~1GB without command "build" The real

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] chroot branch landed

Hello, I just merged the chroot branch. If you updated sugar-build when I suggested it with an email to this list, you will not automatically be upgraded to it (which is unlikely to work anyway). If you missed that email, you are still in time, just git pull git checkout 45e044be8 I'd suggest t

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Please pull now

Hello, I'm planning to land the chroot branch by the end of the week. If you are on master, to avoid being automatically upgraded to it, please pull the latest sugar-build now. You can just ./osbuild pull -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing li

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

On Monday, 22 July 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported >> in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. >> >> - The master branch supports the same distributions i

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hi, > > there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported in > sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. > > - The master branch supports the same distributions it has been supporting > for the last few months, as docume

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build and supported distros

Hi, there seem to be a bit of confusion on what distributions are supported in sugar-build. Let me try to clear it up. - The master branch supports the same distributions it has been supporting for the last few months, as documented on developer.sugarlabs.org. - The chroot branch supports virtual

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > This is really weird, sugar-build from the chroot branch uses the chroot > branch of osbuild > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/blob/chroot/osbuild#L202 > > Which doesn't have --home-dir anymore > > https://github.com/dnarvaez/osb

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

This is really weird, sugar-build from the chroot branch uses the chroot branch of osbuild https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/blob/chroot/osbuild#L202 Which doesn't have --home-dir anymore https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/chroot/osbuild/run.py Maybe try to rm -rf build/out/sandbox

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > It seems like you are running a mix of master and chroot branch code. Did > you start from a clean clone or run osbuild clean before switching branch? > (Hope I remembered to suggest that in my emails). > > I'm trying to figure out how to m

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

I'm probably going to delay landing this for a week or two. I'm traveling so I wouldn't be around much to deal with the issues that will likely be discovered. Though please keep testing! On Wednesday, 10 July 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Hello, > > I'm planning to merge the chroot branch on mast

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

It seems like you are running a mix of master and chroot branch code. Did you start from a clean clone or run osbuild clean before switching branch? (Hope I remembered to suggest that in my emails). I'm trying to figure out how to make the "upgrade" automatic or at least more obvious, but it's tri

[Sugar-devel] sugar-build without chroot

If I have a file prefs.json with {"use_broot": false} as suggested to not use chroot, get the following error: [gonzalo@localhost sugar-build]$ ./osbuild build Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/gonzalo/sugar-build-multiselection/build/commands/build", line 4, in common.run("bui

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Now it seems to be working :D It started pulling automake, so it's time to wait and see if it works. 2013/7/16 Daniel Narvaez : > This is _not_ on a fresh clone I guess? > > Could you try with a fresh clone? I made pretty big changes and it's pretty > hard now to tell you exactly what would need t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

2013/7/15 Daniel Narvaez : > Should be fixed now. Can you give it another try? I get a traceback and don't see any logs. Traceback (most recent call last): File "./osbuild", line 467, in main() File "./osbuild", line 452, in main setup(options.command) File "./osbuild", line 321, i

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Should be fixed now. Can you give it another try? On 14 July 2013 03:05, S. Daniel Francis wrote: > 2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez : > > I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better? > > Both when pulling the current repository and cloning it again, I'm > getting an error: > > Trace

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Some kind of problem with urlgrabber, seeing the same on debian in buildbot. We should probably just use urllib, I will let you know when it's fixed. Thanks! On Sunday, 14 July 2013, S. Daniel Francis wrote: > 2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez >: > > I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

2013/7/13 Daniel Narvaez : > I pushed that change. Can you retry and see if it works better? Both when pulling the current repository and cloning it again, I'm getting an error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./osbuild", line 462, in main() File "./osbuild", line 447, in main

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

I suspect this is because rpm is configured or built differently on suse. Instead of trying to ensure we have the right configuration on each distro, I think it's easier to use prebuilt chroots. That will reduce the amount of code which we need to ensure works cross distro. The dependencies become

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

Hi Daniel, thanks for testing! Which version of open suse are you using? On 13 July 2013 07:35, Daniel Francis wrote: > On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:22:43 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode > > for another few days. Please swit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:22:43 PM Daniel Narvaez wrote: > This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode > for another few days. Please switch to the chroot branch as soon as you > can, when we land you will just need to switch to master, but that won't > trigger a reb

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Landing the chroot branch

This feels ready to land now. I'll leave it there in bug fixing only mode for another few days. Please switch to the chroot branch as soon as you can, when we land you will just need to switch to master, but that won't trigger a rebuild or anything. ___ S

  1   2   3   4   >