On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:44:10PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> >> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
> >> different ways. Not good. What
Thank you. That makes much more sense now.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>
>> I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
>
> When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a guest, not as a host) the
> X
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martin Dengler
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
>> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
>> different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
>
> SoaS works for me.
Yes, SoaS Beta, I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:32:34PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem.
When running Ubuntu Jaunty _within_ KVM (i.e. as a guest, not as a host)
the X server does not work, at least if the "vesa" emulation option is
used (to get screen resolutions > 1024x76
Since the problem of running Sugar native in Jaunty is xephyr dbus policy
and hulahop inevitable out-of synchness with xpcom (as far as I can see from
the reporting) is it possible for the Ubuntu packaging gurus to provide a
ppa that can be added temporarily to the repository list and have fixed
pa
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
> different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
SoaS works for me.
Martin
pgpCm4Y72lxgP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
So SoaS, Jaunty packages, and sugar-jhbuild on Jaunty all fail in
different ways. Not good. What versions of 0.84 actually work?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> FWIW, I have the troubles referred to by Sascha with jhbuild on Jaunty.
>
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at
Oops, I guess you were talking about Soas, not ubuntu jaunty packaged Sugar.
2009/4/27 Eduardo H. Silva :
> Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
> "python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
> modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package" which makes
> Browse not start.
Another semi-blocker of Sugar in Ubuntu Jaunty, is that
"python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5
modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty's package" which makes
Browse not start.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-hulahop/+bug/364871
2009/4/27 Edward Cherlin :
> I'm not clear on
I'm not clear on the nature of your problem. I have no difficulty
running a SoaS image in kvm (apart from broken Activities).
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Getting_Involved/Testing/Soas2-200904231400
I just now confirmed that it runs in Jaunty. I will add details to the
page as so
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:34:21PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
o The culprit appears to be a security setting in config/dbus that
prevents Xephyr from accessing the display. Does anybody know where
this setting is, and what it should say instead?
I've changed the wiki to remove Ubuntu Jaunty fr
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:34:21PM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
o The cyrillic font and hal error messages appear to be irrelevant, as
they are in sugar-jhbuild. I wouldn't mind seeing them fixed, though.
Those are in Xephyr, there's nothing we can do about them,
unfortunately. You might want t
o The cyrillic font and hal error messages appear to be irrelevant, as
they are in sugar-jhbuild. I wouldn't mind seeing them fixed, though.
o The keyboard errors are mysterious to me. I would like to knew
whether they are part of the problem, or just further irrelevancies.
o The culprit appears
13 matches
Mail list logo
